• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Covid-19. Forget the click-bait headlines, the doomsday proclaimers and the conspiracy theorists just look at the data!

is that the stock market index, dont look good, lol
 
1599618906522.png
 
Watch some video on Davos 2021. This pandemic are already hijacked by some people for their global agenda. All government has to opt in or you will be punished.
 
We are Your Ontario Doctors
@concernedontariodoctors · Non-profit organisation


carenotcuts.ca

We are Your Ontario Doctors

15 h ·

THE CASE AGAINST COVID-19 TESTS FOR THE YOUNG & HEALTHY

“Should people who aren’t sick be tested for Covid-19? In August the Centers for Disease and Control Prevention revised its guidance to suggest focusing on the elderly and patients with symptoms. One may be excused for thinking that more testing is always better, but that isn’t true. Anyone can be infected with the virus, but there is a thousandfold difference in the risk of death between the young and the old. Testing strategy should reflect that.

There is little purpose in using tests to check asymptomatic children to see if it is safe for them to come to school. When children are infected, most are asymptomatic, and the mortality risk is lower than for the flu. While adult-to-adult and adult-to-child transmission is common, child-to-adult transmission isn’t. Children thus pose minimal risk to their teachers. If a child has a cough, a runny nose or other respiratory symptoms, he should stay home. You don’t need a test for that.

What would routine Covid-19 testing of children accomplish? A child with no symptoms who tests positive would be sent home and deprived of an education. Enough asymptomatic cases would lead to school closures. Yet the public-health consensus is that classroom learning is important, and closures are highly detrimental. That’s especially true for working-class children, whose parents can’t afford tutors or learning ‘pods,’ but must instead make difficult choices between supervising their children’s education and paying the bills.

Sweden was the only major Western country that kept schools open for kids 15 and younger throughout the pandemic, with no masks or mass testing. How did it turn out? Zero Covid-19 deaths among 1.8 million children attending day care or school. Teachers didn’t have an excess infection risk compared with the average of other professions.

The results of reopening schools are also promising in England. Mark Woolhouse of the U.K. Scientific Advisory Committee for Emergencies, has said that ‘I agreed with lockdown as a short-term emergency response because we couldn’t think of anything better to do,’ but ‘closing schools was not an epidemiologically sensible thing to do.’ The U.K. ‘should have been concentrating on care homes.’

Israeli schools reopened in May, leading to a few outbreaks. But no child was hospitalized or died. An analysis of cellphone mobility data shows that in the weeks leading up to the school opening, Israel had all but returned to prepandemic activity. The Israeli school outbreak was more likely due to community transmission rather than opening classrooms.

As for higher education, most students who are infected will be asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. If students experience symptoms, a reasonable response might be to confine them to their rooms. An unreasonable response would be to send them home to infect their parents and neighbors, who are at much higher risk than their college friends. Again, testing asymptomatic students would only create panic and pressure universities to close, with concomitant educational, economic and psychological harms.

To protect older teachers and professors or those with conditions that predispose them to high risk, schools and universities need to be flexible. Those instructors could teach remotely or grade exams with few face-to-face interactions.

Testing is intended to save lives, not to detect asymptomatic people who are otherwise healthy. The concept of a ‘school outbreak’ is misleading, because it typically denotes a number of positive tests, not significant illnesses. The new CDC guidelines appropriately focus testing resources on hospital workers and the older generation. It is important to increase testing of hospital and nursing-home staff as well as visitors, so that family members can spend time with their older kin, for whom Covid-19 infection poses an unacceptable mortality risk.

Many countries have made the mistake of closing schools to protect low-risk children and teachers while neglecting the protection of those at high risk, especially in nursing homes. With the new CDC guidelines, strategic age-targeted viral testing will protect older people from deadly Covid-19 exposure and children and young adults from needless school closures.”

—Dr. Jay Bhattacharya is a physician and professor at Stanford Medical School
—Dr. Martin Kulldorff is a biostatistician and a professor of epidemiology at Harvard Medical School
 
Back
Top