Concern that credit rule may push some to moneylenders - See more at: http://business

Administrator

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 12, 2013
Messages
420
Points
0
A new rule to deny further credit to people who have chalked up an aggregate debt exceeding 12 months' income for 90 days or more has raised the concern that it might push people to moneylenders, legal or otherwise.

Ms Foo Mee Har, a Member of Parliament for West Coast GRC, said yesterday that as moneylenders and pawnbrokers tend to have "higher interest rates and tougher terms", individuals can become more overstretched financially if they choose to turn to such avenues.

She also pointed out that there is "no centralised cross-agency database that gives the full picture of the individual borrower debt from the various sources", which might prove to be a "regulatory loophole".

Responding to Ms Foo's questions, Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said that the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has to find an "important balance" in the credit rules and that, from now till the rule's implementation in June 2015, individuals can take the time to "work their debts down".

"We set the limit at 12 months' income for a start, so as to allow borrowers who are already over the limit to adjust," said Mr Tharman, who is also Finance Minister.

"MAS expects financial institutions to work actively with their affected customers to take steps to bring down their (customers') unsecured debt levels."

Last month, MAS announced tighter restrictions on credit cards and other unsecured- debt facilities, along with other measures such as requiring banks to conduct more regular credit checks and for them to disclose to borrowers how one's debt could spiral if left unpaid.

Ms Foo also asked how MAS can prevent more people from accumulating debts beyond the 12-month income limit, before the rule kicks in.

Mr Tharman replied that MAS will be starting off with some "softer rules and, eventually, they will become quite hard rules in June 2015".

From December this year, banks will have to do a check with the credit bureau, as well as conduct income checks on borrowers, before increasing borrowers' credit limits.

Mr Tharman said that the rules kick in early, "although we are not specifying that the 12-month limit is a hard limit now".
 
Last edited:
Re: Concern that credit rule may push some to moneylenders - See more at: http://busi

Debtors should be executed to save the rest of us from the trouble they cause.
 
Re: Concern that credit rule may push some to moneylenders - See more at: http://busi

Confirm exceed what...one housing loan already exceed liao
 
Re: Concern that credit rule may push some to moneylenders - See more at: http://busi

People should just spend within what they can afford. This is something no one can control not even the government. It takes discipline.
 
Re: Concern that credit rule may push some to moneylenders - See more at: http://busi

Debtors should be executed to save the rest of us from the trouble they cause.

These are the "workers" who are feeding the massive system up there the pyramid. Without them, there won't be rich people around. Riches are relative.

Why banks are enticing more and more people to lend ( credit card and loans )and live beyond their means ? Reason is because they are the weakest link in the system. They provide massive cash flow interest for the banks every month.
 
Re: Concern that credit rule may push some to moneylenders - See more at: http://busi

Confirm exceed what...one housing loan already exceed liao

Bui, the 12-month is talking about Unsecured Credit. Housing Loan is Secured Credit.
 
Re: Concern that credit rule may push some to moneylenders - See more at: http://busi

These are the "workers" who are feeding the massive system up there the pyramid. Without them, there won't be rich people around. Riches are relative.

Why banks are enticing more and more people to lend ( credit card and loans )and live beyond their means ? Reason is because they are the weakest link in the system. They provide massive cash flow interest for the banks every month.

Well said.

Actually many of them can't afford to buy a house. They should live within their means and not commit themselves to the housing loan / marriage.
 
Re: Concern that credit rule may push some to moneylenders - See more at: http://busi

Ms Foo Mee Har, a Member of Parliament for West Coast GRC, said yesterday that as moneylenders and pawnbrokers tend to have "higher interest rates and tougher terms", individuals can become more overstretched financially if they choose to turn to such avenues.

She also pointed out that there is "no centralised cross-agency database that gives the full picture of the individual borrower debt from the various sources", which might prove to be a "regulatory loophole".

moneylender maybe lah but pawnshops charge higher interest? i tot pawnshop cap at 1% only. was madam fool anyoldhow shooting from arse?
 
Re: Concern that credit rule may push some to moneylenders - See more at: http://busi

moneylender maybe lah but pawnshops charge higher interest? i tot pawnshop cap at 1% only. was madam fool anyoldhow shooting from arse?

Pawnshop bounded by law to charge not more than 1.5% monthly....technically pawnshop is also secure loan.
Legal and illegal loansharks start from 20% per month. Can go up to more than 50% even.
 
Re: Concern that credit rule may push some to moneylenders - See more at: http://busi

Debtors should be executed to save the rest of us from the trouble they cause.

If there is no debt, there is no money.

Money = Debt and Debt = money.
If people dont borrow, there will be no money to spend.
Thats what they mean when they say banks borrow from one another

Think about it!
 
Re: Concern that credit rule may push some to moneylenders - See more at: http://busi

More good years for the loan sharks. :)
 
Back
Top