- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
- Points
- 113
1. I thought the entire programme was quite poorly planned, and I think it boiled down to the lack of content as a result of the amount of time made available (the broadcast started at 2100h, and the results were only announced at 2230h). Shifting the special feature to a later slot might have been more effective, which could hence reduce the need for repetitive commentaries, questions or video clips, as well as the incessant inclusion of advertisement breaks.
2. Dr. Gillian Koh’s performance was rather underwhelming. The newscasters have to assume responsibility for rehashing questions of little value, but Dr. Koh’s perspectives were mere monotonous summaries of what had gone on over the past week. CNA could consider two proposals to address the concern of guests in general: first, to invite two individuals who might be slightly partisan to air their views, so as to generate some form of dynamism and synergy in the exchanges; second, to have guests postulate future scenarios, and to think about how different results might yield varying outcomes.
http://guanyinmiao.wordpress.com/20...ion-evaluating-channel-newsasias-performance/
2. Dr. Gillian Koh’s performance was rather underwhelming. The newscasters have to assume responsibility for rehashing questions of little value, but Dr. Koh’s perspectives were mere monotonous summaries of what had gone on over the past week. CNA could consider two proposals to address the concern of guests in general: first, to invite two individuals who might be slightly partisan to air their views, so as to generate some form of dynamism and synergy in the exchanges; second, to have guests postulate future scenarios, and to think about how different results might yield varying outcomes.
http://guanyinmiao.wordpress.com/20...ion-evaluating-channel-newsasias-performance/
