- Joined
- Mar 10, 2012
- Messages
- 1,895
- Points
- 0
Like General Custer, Hillary Clinton appears as adept at attracting publicity to herself as she is at actually doing anything tangible;
like Custer, she is loud-mouthed and inconvenient and like Custer, her Last Stand is ill-prepared, reckless, and doomed.
The legacy of Hillary Rodham Clinton as Secretary of State, is in a word, disappointing. In terms of work done, the legacy she leaves
is Libya, an illegal attack against a sovereign nation in which NATO took sides in an internal conflict against international law,
performed a spectacular mission creep against the terms of the UNSC Resolutions covering the conflict and used military equipment
against civilian structures, against the Geneva Conventions.
<a href="http://s1267.beta.photobucket.com/user/365Wildfire/library/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/jj559/365Wildfire/HillaryClinton-opt-jpg_070720.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"/></a>
And now, how can any serious diplomat, or indeed, how can anyone who labels herself as intelligent, hope to gain anything by speaking
to Binyamin Netanyahu, who everyone knows is an over-grown errand boy and always has been, doing what he is told and not asking
any questions, and the Palestine Authority, which has been as hopeless at defending Palestinians on the West Bank as Hillary Clinton
has been in controlling Washington's Rottweiler, Israel.
And how can anyone minimally engaged in the game of diplomacy hope to achieve progress on Gaza without engaging with HAMAS, the
main player in Gaza and, here it comes, the democratically elected representative of the Gazan people?
So what was that about democracy?
What was that about terrorism, you know, the terrorists that NATO backed in Libya while still on their own lists of proscribed movements?
like Custer, she is loud-mouthed and inconvenient and like Custer, her Last Stand is ill-prepared, reckless, and doomed.
The legacy of Hillary Rodham Clinton as Secretary of State, is in a word, disappointing. In terms of work done, the legacy she leaves
is Libya, an illegal attack against a sovereign nation in which NATO took sides in an internal conflict against international law,
performed a spectacular mission creep against the terms of the UNSC Resolutions covering the conflict and used military equipment
against civilian structures, against the Geneva Conventions.
<a href="http://s1267.beta.photobucket.com/user/365Wildfire/library/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/jj559/365Wildfire/HillaryClinton-opt-jpg_070720.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"/></a>
And now, how can any serious diplomat, or indeed, how can anyone who labels herself as intelligent, hope to gain anything by speaking
to Binyamin Netanyahu, who everyone knows is an over-grown errand boy and always has been, doing what he is told and not asking
any questions, and the Palestine Authority, which has been as hopeless at defending Palestinians on the West Bank as Hillary Clinton
has been in controlling Washington's Rottweiler, Israel.
And how can anyone minimally engaged in the game of diplomacy hope to achieve progress on Gaza without engaging with HAMAS, the
main player in Gaza and, here it comes, the democratically elected representative of the Gazan people?
So what was that about democracy?
What was that about terrorism, you know, the terrorists that NATO backed in Libya while still on their own lists of proscribed movements?
Last edited:
