• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Citigroup To Split

AWARENESS

Alfrescian
Loyal
Citigroup Reports $8.3 Billion Loss, Splits Into Two

By Bradley Keoun and Josh Fineman
Jan. 16 ,2009

Citigroup Inc. posted an $8.29 billion loss, twice as much as analysts estimated, and said it will split in two under Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit’s plan to rebuild a capital base eroded by the credit crisis.

Citigroup rose 2.3 percent in New York trading after tumbling 43 percent this year through yesterday. Pandit will undo the legacy of former CEO Sanford “Sandy” Weill by creating Citicorp to house the New York-based company’s global bank, and Citi Holdings, for “non-core” assets, including $301 billion of mortgages, bonds, corporate loans and other assets that the government agreed in November to guarantee.

“The financial supermarket was buried today,” said Bill Smith, founder of Citigroup shareholder Smith Asset Management Inc. in New York, who has repeatedly called for a breakup.

A dwindling capital cushion and sinking stock price forced the 52-year-old Pandit to abandon Citigroup’s decade-old strategy of providing investment advice and insurance alongside branch banking, stock underwriting and corporate lending. He’s shedding units to free up capital and save the bank from insolvency.

“They are going to try to home in on what’s worth something, and try and sell the pieces that they really can’t value,” Todd Colvin, vice president of MF Global Inc., said in a Bloomberg TV interview.

Shares of Citigroup rose 6 cents to $3.89 as of 11:31 a.m.

Head Count

Pandit said on a conference call with analysts that the bank plans to cut head count to about 300,000, from 323,000 at the end of December and 352,000 in September.

Citigroup’s lead independent director, Richard Parsons, said today in a statement that the bank also plans to shake up its board of directors. He didn’t provide details. Robert Rubin, the former Treasury secretary who was a consultant to Citigroup’s board, resigned earlier this month after being criticized by investors for failing to help steer the bank clear of the subprime mortgage market’s collapse.

Also unclear is the future of Win Bischoff, a Citigroup executive who took over as chairman in December 2007, when Pandit was named CEO.

Pandit, who took over 13 months ago from ousted predecessor Charles O. “Chuck” Prince, earlier this week announced plans to sell control of the Smith Barney brokerage. The bank said today it has tagged for disposal the CitiFinancial consumer- lending business and Primerica Financial Services life-insurance unit, both building blocks of the financial colossus assembled by Weill.

‘Legacy Assets’

“We can better contain the impact of our legacy assets through dedicated management,” Pandit said on the conference call. “In fact, we hope to make announcement regarding the CEO for this unit shortly.”

Pandit said Citi Holdings will have about $850 billion in assets and the new Citicorp will have about $1.1 trillion.

The bank’s net loss of $1.72 a share compared with a loss of $9.8 billion, or $1.99, a year earlier. Excluding a $3.9 billion gain from the sale of a German consumer bank and other results from discontinued operations, the bank’s loss was $2.44 a share. On that basis, the loss was more than twice as wide as the $1.08 average estimate of analysts in a Bloomberg survey.

As Citigroup plunged 77 percent last year in New York trading, the bank was forced to accept $45 billion of U.S. government rescue funds.

“It looks like a kitchen-sink quarter,” said Peter Sorrentino, who helps manage $16 billion at Huntington Asset Advisors Inc. in Cincinnati, including Citigroup shares. “Sweep it all in there and get this behind us.”

Default Protection

The cost of protecting Citigroup from default dropped 49 basis points to 276, according to CMA Datavision prices for credit-default swaps.

Citigroup’s announcement came as Bank of America Corp., the biggest U.S. bank by assets, received emergency funds from the government to support its acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co. The Charlotte, North Carolina-based company reported a loss of $1.79 billion and cut its dividend to 1 cent a share.

Weill solidified the strategy of serving corporate and individual clients around the world with a range of financial services in 1998, when his Travelers Group Inc. merged with John Reed’s Citicorp to form Citigroup Inc.

Assigning the name Citicorp for the businesses Pandit wants to keep harks back to the pre-Weill era. The old Citicorp traces its roots to the City Bank of New York,

Joint Venture

Citigroup plans to put Smith Barney into a $21 billion joint venture and relinquish majority control to Morgan Stanley. The deal, which bolsters Citigroup’s capital base with a $5.8 billion pretax gain, came less than two months after Pandit told employees he didn’t want to sell the business.

The plan to cut off “non-core” businesses in a deteriorating economy may put the bank into a deeper hole, Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. analyst John McDonald wrote in a Jan. 14 report.

“It will likely be difficult for Citi to effectively dispose of assets and businesses in the current environment,” McDonald wrote. “Any new solution is likely to need an incremental infusion of common equity, either from the government, private investors or the public markets, any of which is likely to be dilutive to existing Citi shareholders.”

The company’s fourth-quarter loss included $4.58 billion of writedowns on subprime mortgages and related bonds called collateralized debt obligations; $991 million on commercial real-estate loans and investments, and $594 million on loans to companies with low credit ratings.

Asset Writedowns

It also included $1.06 billion of writedowns on structured investment vehicles that had to be assumed after they collapsed in late 2007, and $307 million on auction-rate preferred securities that Citigroup agreed to buy back from customers under a settlement with state regulators.

Mitigating the writedowns was a $2 billion gain related to an accounting rule that lets companies mark their liabilities to market value. On the conference call today, Chief Financial Officer Gary Crittenden said that the value of the liabilities fell during the fourth quarter as Citigroup’s bond prices fell.

Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. analyst Richard Bove has criticized the accounting rule as providing an artificial benefit to companies when their own creditworthiness is declining.

Costs for reserves to cover loan losses totaled $12.2 billion, compared with $7.3 billion a year earlier, Citigroup said. In North America, the percentage of credit-card loans more than 90 days past due climbed to 2.87 percent, from 2.19 percent in the third quarter and 1.88 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007.

Revenue in the wealth-management division, which includes Smith Barney, fell 94 percent to $29 million.
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset


Singapore’s GIC says Citi, UBS investments unique

</SPAN>
(Reuters)

16 January 2008
<TABLE cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=1 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD align=middle width=328> </TD><TD class=blk9n align=right width=27>Print</TD><TD align=middle width=35> </TD><TD class=blk9n align=right width=46>E-mail</TD><TD align=middle width=24> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
SINGAPORE - Singapore’s biggest sovereign wealth fund said on Wednesday its large investments in banks Citigroup Inc and UBS AG are unique at a time of financial turmoil and did not represent a strategy shift.

The Government of Singapore Investment Corp (GIC), which has historically kept a low profile unlike sister fund Temasek Holdings, on Tuesday purchased $6.88 billion worth of Citigroup convertible stock after the US lender wrote off $18.1 billion for losses tied to subprime home loans and risky debt.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
‘There is no change in GIC’s investment strategy,’ GIC spokeswoman Jennifer Lewis told Reuters. ‘GIC’s preferred practice in respect of our public equity investments is to take relatively small stakes in companies, for portfolio diversification.’<o:p></o:p>
But the investment in Citigroup came just one month after GIC’s $9.75 billion injection into UBS, which also took a beating from the US mortgage meltdown, leading some analysts to speculate Singapore sovereign funds could seek further chunks of big name Western banks.<o:p></o:p>
‘If you are prepared to take a longer view, why not? This kind of opportunity doesn’t knock every day,’ said Song Seng Wun, Singapore-based head of research at Malaysian investment bank CIMB.<o:p></o:p>
GIC’s Lewis said the fund’s investments in UBS and Citigroup differed from normal practice and that the current financial situation in the US and Europe was ‘unique and unprecedented’.<o:p></o:p>
‘A confluence of factors, like the sub-prime crisis, the credit squeeze, and a possibility of recession, has led some banks with strong franchises, to require urgent capital infusions,’ she said.<o:p></o:p>
GIC’s purchases, along with similar investments in US and European banks by sovereign wealth funds from Asia and the Middle East, attest to the growing clout of state investors in global financial markets, particularly at a time when many Western lenders are reeling from losses.<o:p></o:p>
‘Asian sovereign wealth funds want to invest in global financial institutions because they believe that the price is attractive, and they believe it is a significant component of asset allocation,’ said Peter Redward, Barclays head of rates research for emerging Asia.<o:p></o:p>
GIC, which invests Singapore’s foreign exchange reserves, says it manages well over $100 billion, though many observers believe it controls assets in excess of $200 billion.<o:p></o:p>
An October report by Standard Chartered Bank and Oxford Analytica described GIC as the world’s third largest sovereign wealth fund with $215 billion in assets under management.<o:p></o:p>
Temasek, which manages government surpluses and holds stakes in many Singapore firms, was ranked seventh with assets of $108 billion. Temasek in December agreed to invest up to $5 billion in Merrill Lynch, and also owns large stakes in Standard Chartered, Barclays and Singapore’s DBS Group.<o:p></o:p>
Prior to GIC’s investment in Citigroup, observers had expressed doubts whether the Singapore investor would buy a large stake in a US bank because of risk management issues such as a possible breach of the fund’s sector exposure limit.<o:p></o:p>
GIC’s Lewis said, however, the investments in Citigroup and UBS had been ‘structured with appropriate downside protection, and are within the GIC’s risk management parameters.’<o:p></o:p>
 
Top