• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chua Lee Hong attacks on WP

LeMans2011

Alfrescian
Loyal
TFBH,
I did not state anywhere which indicate that I agree with her views....but that doesn't mean that some of the points which she raised are not valid... And she has a point...
This joker seems utterly confused

it is just like a hawker tells you that he is selling chicken rice and after you pay the money, he said, sorry, now it is char kueh tiao!
I would say, GMS is like a hawker who failed in his business, closed shop, and spread rumor to everyone the neighbouring store's (whose business is blooming!) prata got maggots!
 

skponggol

Alfrescian
Loyal
"不管白猫黑猫,捉到老鼠就是好猫”

Whether the opposition MPs have a clean or dirty personal lives is not important, as long as they are able to stand up and challege the PAP and work for the people, then they are good....

But look at their performance in parliament and their AWOL on their constituency duty.....

可是工人党却是一只不会捉老鼠, 反而被老鼠捉的蓝猫.....而且是一只会偷腥,到处拉屎, 然后躲在洞里,给主人蒙羞的大肥猫.....

Is this still a good cat ???
 

wMulew

Alfrescian
Loyal
Having said your shares, WP did prove action speaks louder than word. They all VOTE AGAINST the bill eventually which is very in line with all opposition party and Singaporeans wish. By this alone, Singaporeans have every reason to vote in more opposition regardless of their party affiliation.

Let's take a close look at what really happened

First off the amt WP proposed wasn't that different

2ndly the approach on the principles of how to formulate the salary by WP was different but because of the massive screw up used in the formula, the principle ended up almost the same, that of which to peg to private sector income earnings

Finally, after getting totally pwn by PAP in parliament and made a mockery of their own manifesto by changing their stance multiple times, they still voted against the bill.

In real life we call these pple hypocrites
 

Kohliantye

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
"‘If this is a First World Parliament, I want none of it,’ I muttered wearily to a colleague at the end of the three days.".

CLH should not be muttering

At such an age she should be snorting, grunting or better still farting

Everyone knows her true colours and motives, ie to run down the oppo.

I personally do not take any of her write-up seriously.

Sheer waste of time.
 

freedalas

Alfrescian
Loyal
Let's take a close look at what really happened

First off the amt WP proposed wasn't that different

2ndly the approach on the principles of how to formulate the salary by WP was different but because of the massive screw up used in the formula, the principle ended up almost the same, that of which to peg to private sector income earnings

Finally, after getting totally pwn by PAP in parliament and made a mockery of their own manifesto by changing their stance multiple times, they still voted against the bill.

In real life we call these pple hypocrites

You have a point there. But then again, for every bill, there will be some PAP MPs who will speak up against it, at times vehemently. And yet, come voting time, they all "AYE". It's plain for all to see that this is nothing but a wayang. And for this purpose, for each bill, some PAP MPs would be selected to speak against it. The PAP MPs take turns in doing so. So who are the worst hypocrites???
 

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
wMulew said:
Let's take a close look at what really happened

First off the amt WP proposed wasn't that different

2ndly the approach on the principles of how to formulate the salary by WP was different but because of the massive screw up used in the formula, the principle ended up almost the same, that of which to peg to private sector income earnings

Finally, after getting totally pwn by PAP in parliament and made a mockery of their own manifesto by changing their stance multiple times, they still voted against the bill.

In real life we call these pple hypocrites

First of all, the one that shifted more is the PAP from an earlier higher salary to a now 40 to 50 % reduced salary. There was no explanation now to defend the previous high salary and no explanation why the present one is more correct.

Secondly it doesn't matter what formula is used to derive the starting salary, and whether the net result is the same or different because what we want to know is that with this salary change, how will the cabinet govern?

Evidently by marking their salaries to the top private sector incomes, whether it is the top 48 or the top 1000, it is linking themselves to the fortune of the elites. This means that only if the elites prosper, will the ministers prosper. This is exactly the wrong KPI that has given us one of the highest Gini coefficient among all similarly developed countries.

WP recommended a salary much lower down as a benchmark. Using that as the new KPI, the ministers' fortune would be linked to the bulk of the people. Unfortunately the ruling party was not able to see the benefit of that or even if they had noticed were interested to work for the elites but not for the bulk of the populace.

This whole exercise caused by widespread unhappiness was carried out only to assuage this unhappiness but not to address the root of the problem.
 

brocoli

Alfrescian
Loyal
TFBH,

I would say that she failed as a critic of WP but that doesn't mean that some of the points which she raised are not valid.

Goh Meng Seng

I would say you totally failed as a critic of WP .... if you wanto self pawned any of your points... by all mean quote Chua Lee Hoong .... go quote a non partisan source like maybe Eunice Olsen..... Chua Lee Hoong is so biased like TracyTan866 that any swing voters will so put off and believe the opposite......

you are a worst walking PR disaster ever........ much worst than anything WP ever commit... just continue shooting yourself...

it is good that you dun have a platform larger than this forum to hang yourself....... otherwise the damage to opp is immeasurable

BTW what is the point of you and Sebastian Teo going to Yaw MPS.... suppot him or watch show....???
 
Last edited:

skponggol

Alfrescian
Loyal
BTW what is the point of you and Sebastian Teo going to Yaw MPS.... suppot him or watch show....???

To persuade and recruit YSL to join NSP......YSL and Steve Chia would give NSP a very strong and distinctive brandname recognition, especially among the women voters.
 
Top