- Joined
- Feb 20, 2010
- Messages
- 2,818
- Points
- 48
https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2019-08-20/doc-ihytcitn0444146.shtml
环球时报：美对台售战机 这笔买卖必须是苦的
2019年08月20日 08:21 环球时报
2,419
原标题：社评：美对台售战机，这笔买卖必须是苦的
美国总统特朗普星期天亲口证实，他已经批准向台湾出售价值80亿美元的F-16V战斗机。据报道，这项军售涉及66架该型战机，分析普遍认为美国国会将很痛快地通过此案。
这将是近年来美国单笔最大的对台军售案，1992年老布什政府决定对台销售150架F-16A/B战机，价值60亿美元。那次军售对中美关系造成了严重破坏，对美方此次对台出售进攻性战斗机，中国也势必做出非常强烈的反应。
客观说，在解放军战力不断大幅提升的情况下，台湾的那点军费就算都买成美国武器，也对台海地区的军事形势产生不了实质影响。台湾早已不能作为大陆的军事对手，解放军有能力在很短时间里解除台军的武装，美国对台军售改变不了这一基本现实。
然而，美国对台军售成为加强美台政治关系的最大纽带，台湾购买美国武器形同交“保护费”，是台独势力展现台湾即使搞极端行动也有美国撑腰、以此愚弄台湾社会的主要手段之一。蔡英文和民进党政府在消息传出的第一时间就极力宣扬此项军购对台湾安全的意义，试图赚政治分和选举分。
反对美国对台军售是北京一贯的坚决立场。这一次特朗普政府做了27年前老布什政府干的事情，又恰逢中美关系全面紧张之时，可以预期，中方会采取强烈的反制措施，两国脆弱的关系必将雪上加霜，经贸谈判也将受到额外冲击。
中国大陆方面可以在两个方向上采取行动。一是加强对台军事压力，先要扣除蔡英文当局极力推动此项军购的“政治得分”，坚决将它变成蔡当局和她本人的政治负分。台湾越买武器风险越大，谁推动军购谁在政治上吃亏，大陆要坚决行动，建立台政坛对军购的这一全新认识。
大陆可以在这方面采取的措施很多，迄今为止推动和平统一是大陆两岸政策的基本宗旨，鉴于台当局恶化两岸关系，大陆的对台政策是可以调整的，突出军事压力不啻为大陆的另一选项。
搞以武拒统、给美国做战略棋子是非常危险的，在中美关系严重紧张的时候，这尤其危险。如果台当局拒绝这一认识，大陆就有必要将这个认识强加给他们。在必要的时候大陆可以摧毁台湾从外国购买的全部军事装备，也可以将解放军宣示国家主权的范围扩大到今天台湾军队活动的区域，随着台当局挑衅增加，这些都非没有可能。
在美国方向，中国应坚决把美国卖F-16V的这笔钱从它对华贸易中扣除出来，无论这意味着什么样的连锁牵动。中美经贸谈判的曲折告诉我们，美国是没有底线的，与它绕不开的斗争越往后拖，越可能意味着我方增加损失。
我们主张，中方今后将美国对台军售与中国购买美国农产品直接挂钩。美国向台湾出售多少武器，中国就少买多少美国农产品。只要我们形成这一决断，并且坚持推行几年，就会形成美国农民与军火商的对抗。用不了太久，美国国内就会形成反对对台军售的力量。
从美台签署军售合同到完成对它的执行是一个漫长过程。我们决不能让这个合同对双方来说都执行得舒舒服服的，要让台湾方面有所难受，也要让华盛顿方面有所心疼。
点击进入专题：
Global Times: US sells fighters to Taiwan. This sale must be bitter.
August 20, 2019 08:21 Global Times
2,419
Original title: Social commentary: The United States sells fighters to Taiwan, this sale must be bitter
US President Trump personally confirmed on Sunday that he has approved the sale of $8 billion worth of F-16V fighters to Taiwan. According to reports, the arms sales involved 66 fighters of this type, and the analysis generally agreed that the US Congress will pass the case very happily.
This will be the single largest military sales case against Taiwan in recent years. In 1992, the Bush administration decided to sell 150 F-16A/B fighters to Taiwan, worth $6 billion. That arms sales caused serious damage to Sino-US relations. China is bound to react very strongly to the US side’s sale of offensive fighters to Taiwan.
Objectively speaking, under the circumstances that the PLA’s combat strength has been greatly increased, Taiwan’s military expenditures have all been bought into US weapons, and it has not had a substantial impact on the military situation in the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan has long been unable to serve as a military opponent of the mainland. The People’s Liberation Army has the ability to disarm the Taiwan military in a short period of time. The US military’s arms sales to Taiwan cannot change this basic reality.
However, US arms sales to Taiwan have become the biggest link to strengthen US-Taiwan political relations. Taiwan’s purchase of US weapons is the same as the “protection fee”. It is the main means for Taiwan’s independence forces to show that Taiwan has even supported the United States to support Taiwan’s society. one. In the first time of the news, Tsai Ing-wen and the DPP government vigorously promoted the significance of this military purchase to Taiwan’s security and tried to earn political points and election points.
Opposing US arms sales to Taiwan is Beijing's consistent and firm stance. This time, the Trump administration did what the Bush administration did 27 years ago, and it coincided with the overall tension between China and the United States. It can be expected that China will take strong countermeasures and the fragile relationship between the two countries will be worse. Economic and trade negotiations will also be subject to additional shocks.
The Chinese mainland can take action in two directions. First, to strengthen military pressure against Taiwan, we must first deduct the "political score" of the Tsai Ing-wen authorities' efforts to promote this military purchase, and resolutely turn it into the political negative of the Cai authorities and her own. The greater the risk of Taiwan buying weapons, the more people who promote military purchases are politically disadvantaged, and the mainland must resolutely act to establish a new understanding of Taiwan’s political arena.
The mainland can take many measures in this regard. To date, promoting peaceful reunification is the basic tenet of mainland China’s cross-strait policy. In view of the deterioration of cross-strait relations by the Taiwan authorities, the mainland’s Taiwan policy can be adjusted, and highlighting military pressure is another option for the mainland. .
It is very dangerous to engage in military rebellion and to make strategic chess for the United States. This is particularly dangerous when Sino-US relations are seriously strained. If the Taiwan authorities refuse this understanding, it is necessary for the mainland to impose this understanding on them. When necessary, the mainland can destroy all the military equipment that Taiwan has purchased from foreign countries. It can also extend the scope of the PLA's declaration of state sovereignty to the area where Taiwan's military activities are active today. These are not possible with the increase of provocation by the Taiwan authorities.
In the US direction, China should resolutely deduct the US dollar for selling F-16V from its trade with China, no matter what kind of chain it means. The twists and turns in the Sino-US economic and trade talks tell us that the United States has no bottom line, and the more it struggles with its insurmountable struggle, the more likely it means that we will increase losses.
We maintain that China will directly link US arms sales to Taiwan directly to China's purchase of US agricultural products. How much weapons the United States sells to Taiwan, and China will buy less American agricultural products. As long as we form this decision and insist on it for a few years, it will form a confrontation between American farmers and arms dealers. It will take too long for the United States to form a force against arms sales to Taiwan.
It is a long process from the signing of the arms sales contract between the US and Taiwan to the completion of its implementation. We must not allow this contract to be implemented comfortably for both parties. We must make the Taiwan side feel uncomfortable and let Washington suffer.
Click to enter the topic:
环球时报：美对台售战机 这笔买卖必须是苦的
2019年08月20日 08:21 环球时报
2,419
原标题：社评：美对台售战机，这笔买卖必须是苦的
美国总统特朗普星期天亲口证实，他已经批准向台湾出售价值80亿美元的F-16V战斗机。据报道，这项军售涉及66架该型战机，分析普遍认为美国国会将很痛快地通过此案。
这将是近年来美国单笔最大的对台军售案，1992年老布什政府决定对台销售150架F-16A/B战机，价值60亿美元。那次军售对中美关系造成了严重破坏，对美方此次对台出售进攻性战斗机，中国也势必做出非常强烈的反应。
客观说，在解放军战力不断大幅提升的情况下，台湾的那点军费就算都买成美国武器，也对台海地区的军事形势产生不了实质影响。台湾早已不能作为大陆的军事对手，解放军有能力在很短时间里解除台军的武装，美国对台军售改变不了这一基本现实。
然而，美国对台军售成为加强美台政治关系的最大纽带，台湾购买美国武器形同交“保护费”，是台独势力展现台湾即使搞极端行动也有美国撑腰、以此愚弄台湾社会的主要手段之一。蔡英文和民进党政府在消息传出的第一时间就极力宣扬此项军购对台湾安全的意义，试图赚政治分和选举分。
反对美国对台军售是北京一贯的坚决立场。这一次特朗普政府做了27年前老布什政府干的事情，又恰逢中美关系全面紧张之时，可以预期，中方会采取强烈的反制措施，两国脆弱的关系必将雪上加霜，经贸谈判也将受到额外冲击。
中国大陆方面可以在两个方向上采取行动。一是加强对台军事压力，先要扣除蔡英文当局极力推动此项军购的“政治得分”，坚决将它变成蔡当局和她本人的政治负分。台湾越买武器风险越大，谁推动军购谁在政治上吃亏，大陆要坚决行动，建立台政坛对军购的这一全新认识。
大陆可以在这方面采取的措施很多，迄今为止推动和平统一是大陆两岸政策的基本宗旨，鉴于台当局恶化两岸关系，大陆的对台政策是可以调整的，突出军事压力不啻为大陆的另一选项。
搞以武拒统、给美国做战略棋子是非常危险的，在中美关系严重紧张的时候，这尤其危险。如果台当局拒绝这一认识，大陆就有必要将这个认识强加给他们。在必要的时候大陆可以摧毁台湾从外国购买的全部军事装备，也可以将解放军宣示国家主权的范围扩大到今天台湾军队活动的区域，随着台当局挑衅增加，这些都非没有可能。
在美国方向，中国应坚决把美国卖F-16V的这笔钱从它对华贸易中扣除出来，无论这意味着什么样的连锁牵动。中美经贸谈判的曲折告诉我们，美国是没有底线的，与它绕不开的斗争越往后拖，越可能意味着我方增加损失。
我们主张，中方今后将美国对台军售与中国购买美国农产品直接挂钩。美国向台湾出售多少武器，中国就少买多少美国农产品。只要我们形成这一决断，并且坚持推行几年，就会形成美国农民与军火商的对抗。用不了太久，美国国内就会形成反对对台军售的力量。
从美台签署军售合同到完成对它的执行是一个漫长过程。我们决不能让这个合同对双方来说都执行得舒舒服服的，要让台湾方面有所难受，也要让华盛顿方面有所心疼。
点击进入专题：
Global Times: US sells fighters to Taiwan. This sale must be bitter.
August 20, 2019 08:21 Global Times
2,419
Original title: Social commentary: The United States sells fighters to Taiwan, this sale must be bitter
US President Trump personally confirmed on Sunday that he has approved the sale of $8 billion worth of F-16V fighters to Taiwan. According to reports, the arms sales involved 66 fighters of this type, and the analysis generally agreed that the US Congress will pass the case very happily.
This will be the single largest military sales case against Taiwan in recent years. In 1992, the Bush administration decided to sell 150 F-16A/B fighters to Taiwan, worth $6 billion. That arms sales caused serious damage to Sino-US relations. China is bound to react very strongly to the US side’s sale of offensive fighters to Taiwan.
Objectively speaking, under the circumstances that the PLA’s combat strength has been greatly increased, Taiwan’s military expenditures have all been bought into US weapons, and it has not had a substantial impact on the military situation in the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan has long been unable to serve as a military opponent of the mainland. The People’s Liberation Army has the ability to disarm the Taiwan military in a short period of time. The US military’s arms sales to Taiwan cannot change this basic reality.
However, US arms sales to Taiwan have become the biggest link to strengthen US-Taiwan political relations. Taiwan’s purchase of US weapons is the same as the “protection fee”. It is the main means for Taiwan’s independence forces to show that Taiwan has even supported the United States to support Taiwan’s society. one. In the first time of the news, Tsai Ing-wen and the DPP government vigorously promoted the significance of this military purchase to Taiwan’s security and tried to earn political points and election points.
Opposing US arms sales to Taiwan is Beijing's consistent and firm stance. This time, the Trump administration did what the Bush administration did 27 years ago, and it coincided with the overall tension between China and the United States. It can be expected that China will take strong countermeasures and the fragile relationship between the two countries will be worse. Economic and trade negotiations will also be subject to additional shocks.
The Chinese mainland can take action in two directions. First, to strengthen military pressure against Taiwan, we must first deduct the "political score" of the Tsai Ing-wen authorities' efforts to promote this military purchase, and resolutely turn it into the political negative of the Cai authorities and her own. The greater the risk of Taiwan buying weapons, the more people who promote military purchases are politically disadvantaged, and the mainland must resolutely act to establish a new understanding of Taiwan’s political arena.
The mainland can take many measures in this regard. To date, promoting peaceful reunification is the basic tenet of mainland China’s cross-strait policy. In view of the deterioration of cross-strait relations by the Taiwan authorities, the mainland’s Taiwan policy can be adjusted, and highlighting military pressure is another option for the mainland. .
It is very dangerous to engage in military rebellion and to make strategic chess for the United States. This is particularly dangerous when Sino-US relations are seriously strained. If the Taiwan authorities refuse this understanding, it is necessary for the mainland to impose this understanding on them. When necessary, the mainland can destroy all the military equipment that Taiwan has purchased from foreign countries. It can also extend the scope of the PLA's declaration of state sovereignty to the area where Taiwan's military activities are active today. These are not possible with the increase of provocation by the Taiwan authorities.
In the US direction, China should resolutely deduct the US dollar for selling F-16V from its trade with China, no matter what kind of chain it means. The twists and turns in the Sino-US economic and trade talks tell us that the United States has no bottom line, and the more it struggles with its insurmountable struggle, the more likely it means that we will increase losses.
We maintain that China will directly link US arms sales to Taiwan directly to China's purchase of US agricultural products. How much weapons the United States sells to Taiwan, and China will buy less American agricultural products. As long as we form this decision and insist on it for a few years, it will form a confrontation between American farmers and arms dealers. It will take too long for the United States to form a force against arms sales to Taiwan.
It is a long process from the signing of the arms sales contract between the US and Taiwan to the completion of its implementation. We must not allow this contract to be implemented comfortably for both parties. We must make the Taiwan side feel uncomfortable and let Washington suffer.
Click to enter the topic:
