• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Chinese are no longer welcome in the Land of the Free

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
As you requested
Chinese Agent Living In Chicago Arrested For Spying On US: Feds
Accusers say he was a Chinese spy tasked with gaining intelligence on potential recruits for a Chinese intelligence service.
By Geoff Dempsey, Patch National Staff | Sep 25, 2018 6:05 pm ET | Updated Sep 25, 2018 8:43 pm ET
CHICAGO, IL — A Chinese national has been arrested on suspicion of spying on the United States for China, according to a press release from the U.S. Attorney's office. Ji Chaoqun, 27, was living in Chicago while working as an agent for a Chinese intelligence agencies, the government says.





Ji "worked at the direction of a high-level intelligence officer in the Jiangsu Province Ministry of State Security," the press release said. Accusers say his mission was to obtain biographical information on eight people for potential recruitment by the Chinese intelligence agency.

Some of the individuals targeted for recruitment were Chinese nationals working in highly competitive STEM — science, technology, engineering and mathematics — fields in the U.S., including some U.S. defense contractors.


Subscribe

Ji is charged with one count of "knowingly acting in the United States as an agent of a foreign government without prior notification to the Attorney General," the release says.

Ji arrived in the United States in 2013 on an F1 Visa to study electrical engineering at the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago.





Agencies involved in making this accusation and arrest include the U.S. Attorney's Office, the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI, with the U.S. Army's 902nd Military Intelligence Group having "provided valuable assistance."

In 2016, Ji was allowed to join the U.S. Army Reserves under a program which authorizes enlistment by legal aliens who have a knowledge of topics vital to the national interest. He joined as a specialist. He is alleged to have specifically declined having had contact with a foreign government in the past seven years.

Ji went to court 4 p.m. Tuesday. If convicted, he faces up to 10 years in prison.

And

Engine Tech And More
The rare extradition of one of China's intelligence agents is a major victory for the U.S. government amid strained ties with Beijing.
BY JOSEPH TREVITHICKOCTOBER 10, 2018
In an apparent first-of-its-kind operation, or at least the first to be successful against the Chinese government, U.S. authorities have secured the extradition of a senior member of that country’s top civilian intelligence agency from Belgium after coaxing him there in the first place. Yanjun Xu stands accused of orchestrating the theft of trade secrets, potentially including details on U.S. military-related systems, from American aerospace companies including GE Aviation. The news comes as President Donald Trump and his administration have become increasingly critical of various Chinese activities targeting the United States, including its long-standing economic and military espionageoperations.

Belgian authorities arrested Xu on April 1, 2018, and the U.S. Department of Justice announced his extradition to the United States on Oct. 10, 2018. The intelligence officer, the deputy division head of the Jiangsu Province office of the Ministry of State Security (MSS), reportedly first began attempting to infiltrate into the American aviation and aerospace sectors in December 2013.

The US military trains their high level officials in the Art of War using Sun Tzu’s book as a reference. On his state visit to USA, Hu Jintao gave George Bush Jr two previous copies of the book with the text woven in silk. Me thinks the subtle message was probably lost on Cowboy Bush.

From Sun Tzu:

4. Thus, what enables the wise sovereign and the good general to strike and conquer, and achieve things beyond the reach of ordinary men, is foreknowledge.

5. Now this foreknowledge cannot be elicited from spirits; it cannot be obtained inductively from experience, nor by any deductive calculation.

6. Knowledge of the enemy's dispositions can only be obtained from other men.

https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sun-tzu/works/art-of-war/ch13.htm

It’s okay for the whites to spy on each other - Russians spy on US, US spies on Germany, Israelis spy on US, etc - but it is not okay for yellow skinned people to spy on white country?

All’s fair in love and war is an Angmoh proverb for crying out loud!
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
In UK, chinese are chinese. Asians are indians.

Difference between other spies and chinese ones, they don't get caught so often.
Now china working so hsrd to get US technology, but western companies have no qualms hiring indians to top post of tech companies. NOW WHY is this so?shouldn't china be recruiting spies from india instead? But i doubt indians are willing to work for chinese bosses.
 
Last edited:

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
The US military trains their high level officials in the Art of War using Sun Tzu’s book as a reference. On his state visit to USA, Hu Jintao gave George Bush Jr two previous copies of the book with the text woven in silk. Me thinks the subtle message was probably lost on Cowboy Bush.

From Sun Tzu:

4. Thus, what enables the wise sovereign and the good general to strike and conquer, and achieve things beyond the reach of ordinary men, is foreknowledge.

5. Now this foreknowledge cannot be elicited from spirits; it cannot be obtained inductively from experience, nor by any deductive calculation.

6. Knowledge of the enemy's dispositions can only be obtained from other men.

https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sun-tzu/works/art-of-war/ch13.htm

It’s okay for the whites to spy on each other - Russians spy on US, US spies on Germany, Israelis spy on US, etc - but it is not okay for yellow skinned people to spy on white country?

All’s fair in love and war is an Angmoh proverb for crying out loud!
Sun Tzu is thought in the USA. The yanks know just as much as The ah tiongs do
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
Nuke away so call Land of The Free ASAP. They are responsible for TOTAL EXTINCTION SUICIDE + GENOCIDE SCAM. Further delay will cause entire planet to perish.
 

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Sun Tzu is thought in the USA. The yanks know just as much as The ah tiongs do

Which makes the Yanks hypocritical to cow peh cow bu about Chinese spying when they themselves are spying on China, Russia, Germany and many other countries whether enemies or allies.

An AngMoh spy in China will stick out like a sore thumb in mainland China!
 
Last edited:

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
In UK, chinese are chinese. Asians are indians.

Difference between other spies and chinese ones, they don't get caught so often.
Now china working so hsrd to get US technology, but western companies have no qualms hiring indians to top post of tech companies. NOW WHY is this so?shouldn't china be recruiting spies from india instead? But i doubt indians are willing to work for chinese bosses.

AngMohs have no qualms about hiring Indians to top post of tech companies because they do not fear India will rise to be a superpower and threaten Ang Moh world hegemony. India was totally colonised by AngMohs but that did not happen to China. The track record of India after independence speaks for Indian incompetence as far as nation building is concerned.

Indians cannot be trusted and more so because India and China have border conflicts. It is the Chinese boss who don’t want to hire Indian subordinates and not the other way round.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
Most east asians do not regard middle eastern or south indian as 'asians'.

Only amdks lump everyone from the continent together as 'asian'.
Only American Indians are Indians. South Asians are just that, Asians. Outsiders from a place far far away. Understand? :cool:
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Which makes the Yanks hypocritical to cow peh cow bu about Chinese spying when they themselves are spying on China, Russia, Germany and many other countries whether enemies or allies.

An AngMoh spy in China will stick out like a sore thumb in mainland China!
Ah tiongs does the same thing...so the USA needs to defend itself..just like the commies doing the same thing...so u expect the yanks to surrender? Look at ah tiong land trade policies...look at how they discouraged imports and FDI and everything ah tiongs do is to develop their own economy...the yanks were fucking dumb to give the tiongs a leg up...if the USA implement such ah tiong land policies.. the hypocrisy from the WTO and ah tiongs will be soo loud that u can hear it all the way from ah tiong land
 

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Ah tiongs does the same thing...so the USA needs to defend itself..just like the commies doing the same thing...so u expect the yanks to surrender? Look at ah tiong land trade policies...look at how they discouraged imports and FDI and everything ah tiongs do is to develop their own economy...the yanks were fucking dumb to give the tiongs a leg up...if the USA implement such ah tiong land policies.. the hypocrisy from the WTO and ah tiongs will be soo loud that u can hear it all the way from ah tiong land

When British Empire was the world superpower and America was a developing country it was staunchly protectionist ahem non-market economy like what China is today:

America was a staunchly protectionist country for most of its history before World War II. One of the very first bills new President George Washington signed, for instance, was the Tariff Act of 1789. He inked the bill on July 4 of that year.

Then, as now, some industries sought protection in Congress from a flood of imports. Most goods entering the U.S. were subjected to a 5% tariff, though in a few cases the rates ranged as high as 50%.

It was the first of many tariffs that Congress passed over a century and a half. They generated the vast majority of federal revenue until the U.S. adopted an income tax in 1913. In some years tariffs funded as much as 95% of the government’s annual budget.

Tariffs have always been a source of controversy, however, starting with that very first one.

Early on, the North preferred higher tariffs to protect infant American industries such as textiles from established English manufacturers. Alexander Hamilton, the nation’s first Treasury secretary, feared the U.S. would remain a weakling unless it built its own industries and became economically independent of the mother country.

“Give us a protective tariff and we will have the greatest nation on earth,” a young politician named Abraham Lincoln said in 1847. Later, as the country’s 16th president, Lincoln rejected free trade and jacked up tariffs during the Civil War to pay for the North’s military campaigns.

...

https://www.google.com.hk/amp/s/www...ory/guid/A2BA0ABC-A0A1-11E8-99D4-B12939332848

Without tariffs and other protectionist measures, all her nascent industries would have been obliterated by more advanced British and European competitors and America would not have become an economic superpower.

So it is super hypocritical of USA to now tell China as a still developing country to lower her protectionist measures.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff_in_United_States_history
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
When British Empire was the world superpower and America was a developing country it was staunchly protectionist ahem non-market economy like what China is today:

America was a staunchly protectionist country for most of its history before World War II. One of the very first bills new President George Washington signed, for instance, was the Tariff Act of 1789. He inked the bill on July 4 of that year.

Then, as now, some industries sought protection in Congress from a flood of imports. Most goods entering the U.S. were subjected to a 5% tariff, though in a few cases the rates ranged as high as 50%.

It was the first of many tariffs that Congress passed over a century and a half. They generated the vast majority of federal revenue until the U.S. adopted an income tax in 1913. In some years tariffs funded as much as 95% of the government’s annual budget.

Tariffs have always been a source of controversy, however, starting with that very first one.

Early on, the North preferred higher tariffs to protect infant American industries such as textiles from established English manufacturers. Alexander Hamilton, the nation’s first Treasury secretary, feared the U.S. would remain a weakling unless it built its own industries and became economically independent of the mother country.

“Give us a protective tariff and we will have the greatest nation on earth,” a young politician named Abraham Lincoln said in 1847. Later, as the country’s 16th president, Lincoln rejected free trade and jacked up tariffs during the Civil War to pay for the North’s military campaigns.

...

https://www.google.com.hk/amp/s/www...ory/guid/A2BA0ABC-A0A1-11E8-99D4-B12939332848

Without tariffs and other protectionist measures, all her nascent industries would have been obliterated by more advanced British and European competitors and America would not have become an economic superpower.

So it is super hypocritical of USA to now tell China as a still developing country to lower her protectionist measures.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff_in_United_States_history
It is also hypocritical of the ah tiongs to say they advocate free trade when they are not.
 

ChristJohnny

Alfrescian
Loyal
Most east asians do not regard middle eastern or south indian as 'asians'.

Only amdks lump everyone from the continent together as 'asian'.

Yes All Races Are Different. Integration had failed as shown in Europe and elsewhere. Please do not keep saying that all of us are the same. If all of us are the same, where the hell is racism shit and violent among countries / races / castes etc are still alive and kicking. Stop all the bullshit.
 

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It is also hypocritical of the ah tiongs to say they advocate free trade when they are not.

The Americans never advocated free trade when they were a developing country. They protected their industries with heavy traffics from independence right up to after WWII - that's more than 150 years!

WTO has different rules for different types of countries. If you are a developing country, you can still join and less strict conditions will be placed on you. That's because everyone understands that what the Americans did for more than 150 years to protect their own industries when they were a developing country is necessary otherwise their domestic industries will be wiped out.

China is a developing country. She has only joined the WTO for say about 2 decades, not 150 years! China will open up her markets at her own pace and when she deems herself ready, unlike 150 years ago when gunboat diplomacy forced her to open up her markets to illegal and addictive drugs some of which were supplied by Americans including the ancestors of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. America only opened up her markets when she became an economic superpower after WWII.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Americans never advocated free trade when they were a developing country. They protected their industries with heavy traffics from independence right up to after WWII - that's more than 150 years!

WTO has different rules for different types of countries. If you are a developing country, you can still join and less strict conditions will be placed on you. That's because everyone understands that what the Americans did for more than 150 years to protect their own industries when they were a developing country is necessary otherwise their domestic industries will be wiped out.

China is a developing country. She has only joined the WTO for say about 2 decades, not 150 years! China will open up her markets at her own pace and when she deems herself ready, unlike 150 years ago when gunboat diplomacy forced her to open up her markets to illegal and addictive drugs some of which were supplied by Americans including the ancestors of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. America only opened up her markets when she became an economic superpower after WWII.
China still a developing country? That is shameless...it's like an adult claiming student concession on public tpt. No wonder trump is fuming... finally there is a US president that is standing up to this BS. No wonder he wants the USA to leave the WTO.
 

kryonlight

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Chinks are no longer welcome and the fault lies squarely with that bastardized panda Xi Jinping. He has made chinks of all nationalities the enemy of the free world.

The sooner the death of Xi Jinping the better for the rest of us chinks!
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
China still a developing country? That is shameless...it's like an adult claiming student concession on public tpt. No wonder trump is fuming... finally there is a US president that is standing up to this BS. No wonder he wants the USA to leave the WTO.
The Americans never advocated free trade when they were a developing country. They protected their industries with heavy traffics from independence right up to after WWII - that's more than 150 years!

WTO has different rules for different types of countries. If you are a developing country, you can still join and less strict conditions will be placed on you. That's because everyone understands that what the Americans did for more than 150 years to protect their own industries when they were a developing country is necessary otherwise their domestic industries will be wiped out.

China is a developing country. She has only joined the WTO for say about 2 decades, not 150 years! China will open up her markets at her own pace and when she deems herself ready, unlike 150 years ago when gunboat diplomacy forced her to open up her markets to illegal and addictive drugs some of which were supplied by Americans including the ancestors of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. America only opened up her markets when she became an economic superpower after WWII.
Another wat the ah tiongs get a free ride.

 
Top