Chindian says spending on citizens will lead to bankruptcy ... rather spend on YOG!

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
8,497
Points
113
SINGAPORE: The People's Action Party's (PAP) Dr Vivian Balakrishnan had harsh words for the policies proposed by the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), saying that they are "tax and spend" programmes that will ultimately lead the country to bankruptcy.

In the coming election, Dr Balakrishnan will be leading his team to contest against SDP - helmed by Dr Chee Soon Juan - in the four-member Holland-Bukit Timah Group Representation Constituency (GRC). Both teams were confirmed as candidates on Tuesday, Sep 1, which was Nomination Day.

Speaking at a press conference on Tuesday afternoon, Dr Balakrishnan said that over the coming hustings ahead of Polling Day on Sep 11, his team will show that SDP has copied policy prescriptions that have failed elsewhere.

"Over the next few days when we dissect the policies, you will see that at the bottom of it all is tax, spend, cut essential services and investments - including defence - that will put our country at risk. And ultimately, this leads to bankruptcy and leads to a very big bill being passed to our children," he said.

"The point I'm making is that these are not new ideas. These are ideas cut, copied and pasted from other parts of the world which have failed."

Dr Balakrishnan - who is currently Environment and Water Resources Minister - did not specify which of the SDP policies he was referring to.

The opposition party has proposed several alternative ideas on issues including the economy and healthcare. For instance, it has suggested increasing social spending and raising personal incomes taxes for the top 1 per cent earners. It also proposed divesting inefficient Government-linked companies (GLCs) which it noted are competing with, and slowing down the growth of small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

Dr Balakrishnan said: "In other words, the SDP will set us on a road to Greece. It is the duty of my team to awaken Singaporeans to the dangers of such policy prescriptions."

He said that the coming elections will be about choosing the future direction of Singapore and the type of leadership that voters want.

"I offer a team that has been here, that has a track record that is well-known. We are not perfect, but people know we are straight, and we would never betray the trust and confidence of our voters," said Dr Balakrishnan, who first entered politics in 2001.
 
Re: Chindian says spending on citizens will lead to bankruptcy ... rather spend on YO

fucking chindian............wasted so much of our money n still tok rots
 
Re: Chindian says spending on citizens will lead to bankruptcy ... rather spend on YO

ACS Class of 1977 vs Class of 1978.
 
Re: Chindian says spending on citizens will lead to bankruptcy ... rather spend on YO

The fact that Vivian boy was such a spendthrift makes his statement even more absurd. :D

You're no stellar role model of fiscal prudence, so sit down and shut up. :rolleyes:

Dear Vivian...


[video=youtube;YAgRBq2jnz4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAgRBq2jnz4[/video]
 
Re: Chindian says spending on citizens will lead to bankruptcy ... rather spend on YO

Chindian is very scared. Dr Chee might just turn out to be the STAR of 2015 General Election, stepping over Chindian's body to give SDP a first GRC in Parliament.

That will be something to remember, for Chindian.
 
Re: Chindian says spending on citizens will lead to bankruptcy ... rather spend on YO

PAP is defending the status quo because the PAP elites are feeding off taxpayers. PAP's new idea is more money for them and NO money for sinkees.

1. Pay themselves well ...Ministers earn $1.6 million, Junior ministers make $1 million, Mayors make $1 million ...but don't measure them against their first world counterparts;

2. Use public resources for the party - latest example, MND used to attack elected MPs from the Opposition

3. Create unnecessary jobs to feed the PAP elites - why do we need mayor? why do we need a minister in charge of a municipal office? why do we need 4 ministers in a ministry?
 
Back
Top