- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 6,684
- Points
- 113
tot i wld pen some words on these 4 chaps as i dont seem to c much comment on them after the PE 'punch' on Sat.
CCS - obviously an apparent big loser fm the PE 'punch'...even young ST journos had the temerity to link him as a failed "strategist" together wif Teo Ser Luck...suddenly CCS appears to hv mysteriously gone 'MIA'...and this is the kind of character who seems to be touted as future PM material?!...then again GCT 'suffered' kway teow r was it towgay being thrown at him during his abysmal baptism of fire as 'strategist' at the seminal Anson BE in 81...so perhaps all is not lost for CCS...interesting to c how he conducts himself after this fiasco...personally though, i just dont c him as PM material....appears to lack political gravitas n the ability to connect n inspire pple...more n more comes across as a paper general perhaps?...
VB - gotta feel for him...chap who came into politics wif so much promise...a person who fm his youth has always appeared to be a political 'animal', quite a rare breed amongst the technocrats parachuted in by pap...now stuck in environment of all places??, again had to be co-opted into pap cec...wat has happpened to him n why is he so quiet of late...v curious to know his views on the PE 'punch'...i wonder whether he will still be in cabinet come next GE r whether he may 'retire' fm politics altogether?...personally i wld like to c him to split fm pap n form his own party, but guess just wishful thinking on my part...
GCT - no word fm him on the PE 'punch'...v curious to hear his 'unvarnished' take for obvious reasons...is he chuckling to himself together wif his kakis at the way LHL & gang hv handled this BE?...does this mean he may now hv more clout wifin pap?...does he wish to hv more clout?...
LKY - finally i come to Harry, left the best for last!...must say his recent 'silence' appears quite eerie, especially after Sat's PE 'Punch'...ironically i was just reading tdy's ST 31/1 , n low n behold there is an op-ed piece 'lifted' fm FT in there, written by 2 top american international relations experts who hv coined Harry "The Grandmaster" strategist, although this title appears to be more in relation to his international statesmanship stature akin to say Harry's good buddy Henry Kissinger rather than on the local political front...be tat as it may, i wld prolly give a 'king's ransom' to be a fly on the wall at 38 Oxley Rd to listen n observe the goings on relating to the PE 'punch' n the local political scene in general...wat do u think is Harry's 'unvarnished' take?...is he still going to influence the PM r take the position tat the PM n his inner circle hv to stand on their own?...this is Singapore's primus inter pares political animal afterall...
PS...on Sat afternoon i was listening to the BBC Davos Forum n interestingly enuff Kishore Mahbubani n George Yeo were on the panel...Kishore perhaps made a somewhat prescient comment when he said tat political leaders(formerly dominant successful authoritarian rulers) wld now hv to talk "with" the people rather than "to" the people to become successful in this era of globalisation n change in technology n communication...
CCS - obviously an apparent big loser fm the PE 'punch'...even young ST journos had the temerity to link him as a failed "strategist" together wif Teo Ser Luck...suddenly CCS appears to hv mysteriously gone 'MIA'...and this is the kind of character who seems to be touted as future PM material?!...then again GCT 'suffered' kway teow r was it towgay being thrown at him during his abysmal baptism of fire as 'strategist' at the seminal Anson BE in 81...so perhaps all is not lost for CCS...interesting to c how he conducts himself after this fiasco...personally though, i just dont c him as PM material....appears to lack political gravitas n the ability to connect n inspire pple...more n more comes across as a paper general perhaps?...
VB - gotta feel for him...chap who came into politics wif so much promise...a person who fm his youth has always appeared to be a political 'animal', quite a rare breed amongst the technocrats parachuted in by pap...now stuck in environment of all places??, again had to be co-opted into pap cec...wat has happpened to him n why is he so quiet of late...v curious to know his views on the PE 'punch'...i wonder whether he will still be in cabinet come next GE r whether he may 'retire' fm politics altogether?...personally i wld like to c him to split fm pap n form his own party, but guess just wishful thinking on my part...
GCT - no word fm him on the PE 'punch'...v curious to hear his 'unvarnished' take for obvious reasons...is he chuckling to himself together wif his kakis at the way LHL & gang hv handled this BE?...does this mean he may now hv more clout wifin pap?...does he wish to hv more clout?...
LKY - finally i come to Harry, left the best for last!...must say his recent 'silence' appears quite eerie, especially after Sat's PE 'Punch'...ironically i was just reading tdy's ST 31/1 , n low n behold there is an op-ed piece 'lifted' fm FT in there, written by 2 top american international relations experts who hv coined Harry "The Grandmaster" strategist, although this title appears to be more in relation to his international statesmanship stature akin to say Harry's good buddy Henry Kissinger rather than on the local political front...be tat as it may, i wld prolly give a 'king's ransom' to be a fly on the wall at 38 Oxley Rd to listen n observe the goings on relating to the PE 'punch' n the local political scene in general...wat do u think is Harry's 'unvarnished' take?...is he still going to influence the PM r take the position tat the PM n his inner circle hv to stand on their own?...this is Singapore's primus inter pares political animal afterall...
PS...on Sat afternoon i was listening to the BBC Davos Forum n interestingly enuff Kishore Mahbubani n George Yeo were on the panel...Kishore perhaps made a somewhat prescient comment when he said tat political leaders(formerly dominant successful authoritarian rulers) wld now hv to talk "with" the people rather than "to" the people to become successful in this era of globalisation n change in technology n communication...