• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Challenge accepted: PSP vs PAP debate on CECA

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
Staff Writer, Singapore
·Editorial Team
Tue, 22 June 2021, 5:15 pm

Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam (left) has challenged the PSP's Leong Mun Wai (right) to debate CECA in Parliament. (Yahoo News Singapore file photos)

Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam (left) has challenged the PSP's Leong Mun Wai (right) to debate CECA in Parliament. (Yahoo News Singapore file photos)

SINGAPORE — The Progress Singapore Party (PSP) has accepted Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam's challenge to debate the Singapore-India Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) in Parliament.

"The most important economic policies that have affected the jobs and livelihoods of Singaporeans relate to Foreign PMETs and Free Trade Agreements, in particular the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) with India," said Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Leong Mun Wai in a Facebook post on Tuesday (22 June), referring to professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs).

Leong, who is a member of the PSP's central executive committee, added that his party will seek "further information from the government" in Parliament next month in preparation for the debate, after which it will "decide on a suitable time to file a motion".

"It will be then up to the Speaker’s discretion to confirm the date of the debate," he added.

During a parliamentary session in May, Shanmugam issued a challenge to Leong to openly debate CECA.

"If anyone here believes that CECA is a problem, put it up for a motion debated openly, and let's hear whether Singaporeans benefit or lose from it," said Shanmugam.

"I'm looking at you, Mr Leong," he added. "I invite you to put up a motion to debate CECA. You know that most of what is said about CECA is false."

Earlier during the session, Shanmugam also pointed to certain "parties" that have been deliberately stoking fears of foreigners as well as "encouraging racism and xenophobia" in Singapore, and warned that such actions were "dangerous".

In his Facebook post on Tuesday, Leong said that the PSP believes Singapore is in need of rebalancing the interests of Singaporeans in relation to foreign PMETs in the job market. He noted the process could involve "the recouping of tens of thousands of jobs" from work pass holders through various measures.

While this would affect the number of PMETs in the Singapore workforce, it is a "necessary step" towards creating a "win-win situation for both Singaporeans and foreign nationals", he added.

"The first step in achieving this is obtaining prompt and complete information so as to promote transparency and to eliminate prejudices. All of which is in the spirit against xenophobia and racism," said Leong.

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/challenge-accepted-psp-debate-ceca-parliament-071554054.html
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
later Kee Chiu ask “what’s the point behind the question?” again.
 

Huatable

Alfrescian
Loyal
CECA destroys our white collar jobs and CECA is used by indians in Singapore to rebadge China goods as Made-In-Singapore for preferential tariffs.
 

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
KNN who will be the leeferee? KNN will there be a full time leesult of who win lose or draw or just tcss leebate and ft ? KNN
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The end result of this open dialogue will be inconsequential. It only serves as a start of a national discourse.

Regardless of the outcome, CECA will not be abolished. What's interesting will be the issues brought up during the debate. Sinkies will have to go forward with this discussion online or off.

That's why it's important that opposition MPs ask the right questions during this window
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
PAP going to get their lightning karma.
CECA was conjured up because Singapore was afraid businesses and corporations would shift to other countries with lower costs of labour.
But they fail to understand that Singapore's strength is unique and without peers in the the region, namely, our legal system, stability, educated workforce and almost non existent corruption. For these reasons, investors will still come to Singapore even with higher labour costs, if we did not have CECA.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Debate? Will it be held in a neutral venue? And who is the debate moderator? :wink:

It's a farce, and probably a distraction from the pandemic. :cool:
 
Top