-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
CECA who killed Indo girl with EV to be charged on Apr 8 for driving without due care and attention
- Thread starter nabeifuckpap
- Start date
Once she showed her CECA badge in court,the judge will know what to do.555Sinkieland has no independent judiciary, the verdict has already been decided by the judge's boss.
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2017
- Messages
- 617
- Points
- 43
Honestly, reading about that Chinatown accident doesn’t just make you sad, it makes you livid, not just because a six-year-old girl is dead, which is tragic enough, but because of the absolute joke this case represents to anyone with eyes.
A child is dead. The driver gets hit with "careless driving." Seriously? For most of us watching, that felt like a slap in the face the second it was announced.
This is where the real rage kicks in. There’s this growing feeling that a certain class of people basically has a "get out of jail free" card that the rest of us will never see. You can call it "social sensitivity" or "policy caution" or whatever PR term makes you sleep better at night. On the ground, we just see it for what it is. A double standard. Softer stories, walking on eggshells, and this pathetic hesitation to just call a spade a spade.
I’m sure the intentions were all noble, don’t want to stereotype anyone, gotta keep the peace in our "diverse society." Too bad intentions don't mean a thing when you're busy flushing public trust down the toilet.
When people see cases like this and realize accountability is being watered down, it doesn’t magically make prejudice go away, it strengthens it. It breeds deeper resentment, it hardens people’s views. It’s literally creating the exact divide that these policymakers claim they’re trying to avoid.
People aren't stupid, they compare cases, they remember what happened last time. They notice when the language gets "softened," in propaganda when responsibility is diluted, and when the consequences are suspiciously light.
The conclusion people are reaching is pretty dangerous. They’re starting to believe that some people are just flat-out above the law.
Whether that’s 100% true doesn't even matter at this point. Perception is everything. Once you believe the system is rigged, every new case just proves you right.
This is exactly how you kill faith in institutions. It’s not one big explosion. It’s a slow burn, case by case, doubt by doubt.
If the whole point of this was to "prevent stereotypes," then congrats, it’s backfiring spectacularly. You aren't removing bias. You’re just feeding it and making it louder.
The only way out of this mess is brutal, 100% consistency. Same standards. Same language. Same consequences for everyone. No "selective sensitivity" and no invisible lines that nobody’s allowed to cross. Because the second people realize that "equality before the law" has terms and conditions, that resentment isn't just inevitable. In their minds, it’s completely justified.
A child is dead. The driver gets hit with "careless driving." Seriously? For most of us watching, that felt like a slap in the face the second it was announced.
This is where the real rage kicks in. There’s this growing feeling that a certain class of people basically has a "get out of jail free" card that the rest of us will never see. You can call it "social sensitivity" or "policy caution" or whatever PR term makes you sleep better at night. On the ground, we just see it for what it is. A double standard. Softer stories, walking on eggshells, and this pathetic hesitation to just call a spade a spade.
I’m sure the intentions were all noble, don’t want to stereotype anyone, gotta keep the peace in our "diverse society." Too bad intentions don't mean a thing when you're busy flushing public trust down the toilet.
When people see cases like this and realize accountability is being watered down, it doesn’t magically make prejudice go away, it strengthens it. It breeds deeper resentment, it hardens people’s views. It’s literally creating the exact divide that these policymakers claim they’re trying to avoid.
People aren't stupid, they compare cases, they remember what happened last time. They notice when the language gets "softened," in propaganda when responsibility is diluted, and when the consequences are suspiciously light.
The conclusion people are reaching is pretty dangerous. They’re starting to believe that some people are just flat-out above the law.
Whether that’s 100% true doesn't even matter at this point. Perception is everything. Once you believe the system is rigged, every new case just proves you right.
This is exactly how you kill faith in institutions. It’s not one big explosion. It’s a slow burn, case by case, doubt by doubt.
If the whole point of this was to "prevent stereotypes," then congrats, it’s backfiring spectacularly. You aren't removing bias. You’re just feeding it and making it louder.
The only way out of this mess is brutal, 100% consistency. Same standards. Same language. Same consequences for everyone. No "selective sensitivity" and no invisible lines that nobody’s allowed to cross. Because the second people realize that "equality before the law" has terms and conditions, that resentment isn't just inevitable. In their minds, it’s completely justified.
Similar threads
