SAF is under the command of who?

The paper generals are well paid and won't stray one lah!
If anything, Chinese understand greed and motivation more than any other races.
In Singapore SAF is peasant and peasant is SAF, in a political situation for the use of forces, generals regardless how they are paid or incompetent have nearly zero chance to reverse the men's political positions by order.
They will only flee or get shot dead trying to serve PAP.
You can be sure that PAP only put trusted dogs to be generals, but that is still far from this dream to use military orders or forces to achieve political goals, because only the reverse result will be there awaiting.
Military coups to gain power had been and still will be carried out by lower officers who have balls bigger than the generals. Colonel Gaddafi of Libya and Colonel Suharto from Indonesia for example. In Myanmar their generals had lost power to their own subordinates using softer coups. A major by a name I can not remember was well respected and very popular in Philippines during People's Power.
Chinese Mao was also a lower positioned officer initially in the CCP, and it was only during heavy losses ad serious defeats suffered by CCP under KMT troops attacks, and during which Mao's battle plan proposals was proven to be effective that he gained power. But what was his qualifications and trainings? He had no formal military background at all, not even BMT! He was just a librarian from Chang Sha library. Big time generals with big troops and formal trainings etc got defeated by strategies from a no body.
Real leadership emerged from unexpected places, Hitler was only an NCO in the German army! BGs in Singapore are not expected to perform anything other than blow-jobs. If forces are to be exercised politically in Singapore BGs are not able to prevent anything, neither side can really count on them, they will not be able to cause anything to happen nor preventing anything from happening.
