• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

butch looking CEO - my leadership helped avert 'huge fare increases'

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
7,177
Points
48
SINGAPORE - SMRT CEO Saw Phaik Hwa (picture) has continued to share her side of the story on her personal blog, with a post on Saturday on how her leadership helped to raise SMRT's revenue, preventing "huge fare increases".

Ms Saw, who resigned in January after two major train service breakdowns on the North-South Line in December, said that one of her main tasks when she joined the company nine years ago was to improve the bottom line.

"This was the first time I was faced with a business whereby costs escalated quickly but revenue did not grow at the same pace. Ridership was growing at a steady but slow 2 per cent annually, with limited or no fare increase," said Ms Saw, whose retail background and suitability to run SMRT had come under fire in the wake of the breakdowns.

As the company "can never cut corners" to improve margins, the "most obvious opportunity" was to make full use of its station assets - the space.

Ms Saw said the monies brought in from maximising retail and advertising space benefitted commuters. SMRT managed to raise commercial revenue from S$28 million to more than S$100 million, "averting the need for huge fare increases".

Other key challenges when she became CEO included improving LRT services, which were suffering multiple stoppages, and managing the merger with TIBS.

"Delving deeper, we realised that the LRT was run as a separate company, not only legally but also in every way. For example, the strong SMRT train team was not involved in the running of the LRT trains," she said. "Thus, it was not surprising that the young LRT team was in over its head. Its actions were mainly stop-gap measures."

The company's train management eventually merged with SMRT, and problems like its "badly-commissioned geoloc system" and complicated power system were tackled.

As for the TIBS merger, which faced resistance due to "turf pride", Ms Saw said this was eventually resolved by consulting all its staff on defining its mission.

Ms Saw also addressed the criticism to her starting a blog, saying the negative comments did not surprise her.

She wrote: "Friends ask me to respond but I don't feel a need to. If you have enjoyed what I've posted so far (and I know it's not a lot), thank you for reading. If you have not found it interesting, then perhaps an alternative blog or website might better suit you. I leave it up to you."

Her last day at SMRT is April 5.

showimageCC.aspx
 
She wrote: "Friends ask me to respond but I don't feel a need to. If you have enjoyed what I've posted so far (and I know it's not a lot), thank you for reading. If you have not found it interesting, then perhaps an alternative blog or website might better suit you. I leave it up to you."


Up yours la!
 
It is true. What she did averted huge fare increase.

Oh really? She sounded as though SMRT was in a competitive environment but the fact is SMRT is almost a monopoly. Revenue will keep pouring in. The only way a monopoly kills itself is through self-destruction by not controlling its costs.

So what exactly did they spend on? Could she not slow down costs without compromising standards?
 
9044d3da3b6ea02ac17681737ff92684_330.jpg


She wrote: "Friends ask me to respond but I don't feel a need to. If you have enjoyed what I've posted so far (and I know it's not a lot), thank you for reading. If you have not found it interesting, then perhaps an alternative blog or website might better suit you. I leave it up to you."


Up yours la!
 
Last edited:
That's true. I heard that SMRT staff are very poorly paid.



Oh really? She sounded as though SMRT was in a competitive environment but the fact is SMRT is almost a monopoly. Revenue will keep pouring in. The only way a monopoly kills itself is through self-destruction by not controlling its costs.

So what exactly did they spend on? Could she not slow down costs without compromising standards?
 
SMRT managed to raise commercial revenue from S$28 million to more than S$100 million, "averting the need for huge fare increases

She's lying thru her teeth.. There's still no remorse at all from this ugly fugly Matlaysian Bitch..:oIo: :mad: :oIo:
 
Oh really? She sounded as though SMRT was in a competitive environment but the fact is SMRT is almost a monopoly. Revenue will keep pouring in. The only way a monopoly kills itself is through self-destruction by not controlling its costs.

So what exactly did they spend on? Could she not slow down costs without compromising standards?

smrt is almost a monopoly but their main revenue is not from transport - it is from retail, rental and ads in mrt
 
That's true. I heard that SMRT staff are very poorly paid.

True... When goin for my RT sessions last yeat, got to know this Malay chap works as a SMRT train driver... He takes home only 1.3K a month..
 
True... When goin for my RT sessions last yeat, got to know this Malay chap works as a SMRT train driver... He takes home only 1.3K a month..


You pay more fares la. then the malay cleaner can get paid more.
 
After so many years under PAP leadership, I can take any bullshit thrown at me.
 
If this was her come back interview, wow! If anybody wondered why the public castigated her, the wondering will stop now...
 
Back
Top