-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
British and China both canned people (and films) for supporting protestors
- Thread starter ginfreely
- Start date
Poor Hokkien hero TOP pioneer filmmaker 1927 movie kena chopped off 1/3 by British due to the Cantonese director was separately involved with filming the aftermath of the 30 May 1925 British massacre of Chinese student protesters in Shanghai.
Google translate
"New Guest" came to the British colonial government's censorship, originally composed of nine volumes, the audience can only see the first six volumes, the latter three volumes can not pass the censorship.
Google translate
At the time of the "New Guest" screening, the audience was full of "women's. There are also people on the scene selling "New Guest" special issue, every two corners. This special issue has a total of nine books, but the seventh and eighth And the nine books were last minute unable to pass the British government's censorship and could not be sold on the spot. The film "New Guest" was originally a total of nine books, and also because the seventh, eight and nine were banned by the review bureau. Only the first book can be shown that night. The sixth book, "New Guest." In other words, "New Guest" has indeed been screened. However, because of the content of this film, one third of them can't pass the review of the British colonial government, so the audience will see the new guest in the theater. "," is only two-thirds of the original copy of the film. In the year, "Celebration Bell" was serialized with several articles of "New Guest", Chen Xueyu, who discussed and reflected on the film incident. Chen Xuezhen believed that the British colonial government’s film review was too strict. Lack of transparency requires the British colonial government to "promulgate an open regulation." 30
Basically British censorship bureau last minute did not permit the last 1/3 of the film to be screened and there was a lack of transparency with no proper regulations and reasons for the ban.
canned like in chopped, cooked, and canned (as in sardines)?
Poor Hokkien hero TOP pioneer filmmaker 1927 movie got canned by British for nothing!
Ya kena chopped cut and blocked
Google translate
4. Union Film Company "five volumes of Shanghai Chao" (1925, 2 books). Edit and explain Xu Bibo, photographer Guo Chaowen. The record of more than 2,000 Shanghai students who took part in the May 30, 1925 demonstration for the support workers in Nanjing Road, was subjected to British imperialist patrols during the speech, the general strike of the city's workers, the general strike of the students, and the anti-imperialists of the general manager of the city. The situation of struggle.
Basically this is the documentary on 30 May 1925 British massacre of student protestors in Shanghai separately filmed by the Cantonese director hired by Hokkien hero TOP pioneer filmmaker to film the 1927 movie named NEW GUEST OR NEW IMMIGRANTS.
cockblocked by you?
KNN you horny slut don't think my uncle don't know you referring to 嫖客到 you sucked their cock and got censored KNN
Tsk tsk tsk so filthy Cantonese son of whore LIAR CRIMINAL BULLY TOP smearer deserved it for bullying me and China.
Coward filthy dogs like you bullying me hiding behind computer certainly deserved to be chopped into minced meat.
Similar threads
