• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Britain's micro-monitored Muslims

JPMorgan888

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think they have every right to monitor these moslems

Britain's micro-monitored Muslims

Are the UK's security services using terror fears over Syria as a hook to win ever more powers of surveillance?

The British media has been full of fears about UK jihadists fighting in Syria - and then wanting to commit acts
of terror upon returning home. Hundreds of Brits are thought to be waging war in Syria - and the
government has warned that such individuals may face arrest upon return.

A British lorry driver is thought to have carried out a suicide bomb attack in Syria, detonating a lorry packed
with explosives at an Aleppo prison in February. There are blood-curdling stories of British Muslims boasting
about killing in Syria and trying to attract fresh recruits.

One fighter from the UK reportedly talked up a "five star jihad" in Syria - referring to its "relaxing" nature.
Fighters 'magnet'

And there have already been arrests - including that of former Guantanamo Bay detainee turned civil
liberties activist, Moazzam Begg, on suspicion of terror-related offenses in Syria, allegedly dating back to a
visit in 2012. Begg has said that he has only ever been involved in charity work in Syria; his trial, on
terrorism charges, has just been set for early October.

Syria's nightmarish conflict has been described as a "magnet" for radical Islamists around the world - there
are thought to be around 2,000 foreign fighters in the country.

Now, the worry is that fighters returning from Syria do so with "enhanced capabilities", as UK home secretary
Theresa May stated, to launch attacks at home. But, however real this concern may be, the scary warnings
emanating from the UK government and security services are crying out for some context.

One key factor - which may well undermine government attempts to defuse any potential threat - is the
inconsistency of its own approach.This, after all, is the same government that openly supports the downfall
of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, backs the Syrian rebels pursuing this goal, lost a parliamentary vote
on military intervention in Syria last year - and is fully aware that its allies in the Gulf are funding al-Qaeda affiliated groups in Syria.

What message is this supposed to send out, to any individuals who act on the idea that what war-ravaged
Syria really needs right now is more gun-wielding fighters?

Inconsistency

On top of that is inconsistency over which fighting, in which part of the world, constitutes an extremism that
becomes dangerous upon return to the UK. Several commentators have pointed out that British citizens went to
fight in Libya, too - during the 2011, NATO-backed uprising that led to the removal of Muammar Gaddafi's
regime. On that occasion, individual involvement in the fighting was not deemed to be a danger.
Indeed, analysts have pointed out that security officials and terror "experts" may have badly wired the
connection between fighting overseas and intentions to attack the UK.

Arun Kundnani, author of The Muslims are Coming! Islamophobia, extremism and the domestic War on Terror, says:
"There's a tendency amongst the experts, who develop this radicalisation model to think of a conflict like
Syria in a way that overemphasises the role of extremist religious ideology, and doesn't pay attention to the
very specific political factors."

Kundnani, whose book offers a critique of counter-radicalisation strategies, explains that what draws foreign
fighters into Syria is the mass killings, torture, violence and starvation carried out by the regime - none of
which are factors in Britain.

Meanwhile, the government has also issued warnings on Muslim charitable ventures to Syria, amid reports that
British fighters use aid convoys as cover to get into the country.

Community workers say that mosques have been leafleted over the risks of questioning or arrest under
terror laws for independent charity operations to Syria, while those who have engaged in aid work have
been visited by security and counter-terrorism officials.

Salim Bhorat, a community activist in Bolton, north-west England, says that Muslims selling cakes to raise
money for Syria are now feeling scared and angry because "anything they are doing is being conflated with
terrorism".

Ex-gitmo detainee talks to Al Jazeera about Syria visit prior to UK detention


Micro-monitored population

Nafeez Ahmed, who has written extensively on counter-insurgency and the war on terror, says that this sort
of blanket, "criminalise everything" approach may be more about "politicking and being seen to be doing
something in the public eye".

And like others, he argues that such measures are ultimately counterproductive - last year, Ahmed reported
that even intelligence gathering officials admitted that the government's counter-terrorism strategy is
"fundamentally flawed".

The problem is that such strategies, as implemented through the government's widely criticised Prevent
policy, view certain factors - being a non-violent Islamist, say, or being critical of British foreign policy - as
placing Muslims on a "conveyor belt" that leads inexorably to violent extremism.

Community workers have for some time warned that this operating premise is squashing space for legitimate
grievances to be aired, thereby exacerbating alienation - and potentially giving free recruitment opportunities
to violent groups.

None of this is to ignore the fears of radicalisation regarding Britons who have been in Syria - exposed both
to the emotionally altering obscenities of the war in Syria and, potentially, the abhorrent ideologies of violent
groups operating there. Concern, whatever the scale, cannot be ruled out.

But if, as the UK's security and immigration minister, James Brokenshire, has said, the issue is something
that will be with us for "the foreseeable future", we need to find better ways of tackling it.

The current approach has reinforced a sense that terror fears over Syria are being used as a hook by
security services to win ever more powers of surveillance and arrest over an already micro-monitored
population of Muslims in Britain. And that is the last thing likely to help.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
I say exterminate the lot of them. "Off with their heads !" as the King used to say.....
 

rushifa666

Alfrescian
Loyal
Oh yes. Religious nut jobs are what is holding the world back. Mao had the right idea. They are a fundamentally stupid lot anyway
 

groinroot

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Brits are fools to feed and house them on tax payers money. Why do Muslims take up residence in a white country and not in an Arab country? Because they can't sponge on Arabs.
 

groinroot

Alfrescian
Loyal
Cunt Cutting Barbarians are taking over Britain

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-26681364
21 March 2014 Last updated at 12:50

FGM: UK's first female genital mutilation prosecutions announced
Whittington Hospital An offence was allegedly carried out by a doctor at the Whittington Hospital in London

The first UK prosecutions over female genital mutilation have been announced by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

Dr Dhanoun Dharmasena, 31, of Ilford, Essex, will be prosecuted for an alleged offence while working at the Whittington Hospital in London.

Hasan Mohamed, 40, of Holloway, north London, faces a charge of intentionally encouraging female genital mutilation.

Dr Dharmasena and Mr Mohamed will appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on 15 April.
'Sufficient evidence'

In a statement, director of public prosecutions Alison Saunders said the CPS was asked by the Metropolitan Police to consider evidence in relation to an allegation of female genital mutilation (FGM).
Continue reading the main story
Female genital mutilation

FGM includes procedures that alter or injure female genital organs for non-medical reasons
About 140 million girls and women worldwide are living with the consequences of FGM
Dangers include severe bleeding, problems urinating, infections, infertility, complications in childbirth and increased risk of death for newborns

Source: World Health Organisation

Find out more from the WHO
BBC ethics guide: Female circumcision

It was alleged that following a patient giving birth in November 2012, a doctor at the Whittington Hospital repaired female genital mutilation that had previously been performed on the woman, allegedly carrying out female genital mutilation himself.

Ms Saunders said: "Having carefully considered all the available evidence, I have determined there is sufficient evidence and it would be in the public interest to prosecute Dr Dhanoun Dharmasena for an offence contrary to S1 (1) of the Female Genital Mutilation Act (2003).

"I have also determined that Hasan Mohamed should face one charge of intentionally encouraging an offence of FGM, contrary to section 44(1) of the Serious Crime Act (2007), and a second charge of aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring Dr Dharmasena to commit an offence contrary to S1 (1) of the Female Genital Mutilation Act (2003).

"These decisions were taken in accordance with the code for crown prosecutors."
Misunderstanding

The CPS has decided to take no further action in one other new case and in three cases that were under review having been considered previously.

In the new case it was alleged that two parents had arranged for their daughter to undergo female genital mutilation while abroad.

In one of the other cases a suspect contacted an FGM helpline to request the procedure for his two daughters after misunderstanding the purpose of the service for victims.

Specialist midwife on the impact FGM has on women

The Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 replaced a 1985 Act, in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, raising the maximum penalty from five to 14 years in prison.

It also made it an offence for UK nationals or permanent UK residents to carry out FGM abroad even in countries where it is legal.

The CPS is currently considering four cases of alleged FGM, one of which is a case that is being reviewed.

Prosecutors have also had discussions with police over investigations into two further cases, which are currently at an early stage.
'Unforgivable'

The UK has in the past been compared unfavourably to other countries over the issue, such as France where there have been more than 100 successful prosecutions.

MPs have said it is "unforgivable" that there have been no UK prosecutions since laws against FGM were introduced nearly 30 years ago.

This was despite more than 140 referrals to police in the past four years.

Education Secretary Michael Gove is writing to every school in England to ask them to help protect girls from FGM.
 
Top