• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Brit Gynae Beheads Unborn Baby! Guess Her Race!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
icdoctor110518.jpg


A British consultant gynaecologist could be struck off the medical register for decapitating an unborn baby in the womb, while she was carrying out a delivery for a 30-year-old mother in 2014.

Dr Vaishnavy Laxman, 41, attended to the mother with a team of doctors at the Ninewells Hospital in Dundee on March 16, 2014, when the tragedy occurred.

According to British media reports, Dr Laxman should have performed an emergency caesarean section, as the premature infant was in a breech position.

However, she allegedly ignored advice and carried out a natural delivery.

The mother, known only as Patient A during Thursday's (May 10) hearing by the British Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service in Manchester, was told to push while traction was applied to the baby's legs.

As a result of this, the infant's legs, arms and torso became detached from the head, reported The Guardian.

Two other doctors later carried out a caesarean section to remove the baby's head, before it was reattached to his body, so that his mother could hold him to say goodbye.

The Telegraph reported that the mother had come face to face with Dr Laxman during the hearing.

"I don't forgive you - I don't forgive you," she said, as she looked at Dr Laxman, who has denied contributing to the death of the baby.

According to The Telegraph, the mother's water had broken early at 25 weeks and upon examination, her unborn baby was found to have a prolapsed cord. The infant was in a breech position, while the mother's cervix was around 2cm to 3cm dilated.

But it was revealed at the hearing that it has not been established whether the mother was in labour.

Recounting her ordeal, the mother said that she was told in an earlier scan that her son would be delivered by caesarean section.

But when she was taken to the labour suite, nobody had told her what was happening, she claimed.

"I was not given gas and air - I was in pain. I had the doctors putting their hands inside me and I had them pushing on my stomach and then pulling me down," she said.

"I tried to get off the bed but they pulled me back three times and just said they had to get the baby out.

"They twice tried to cut my cervix and nobody told me they were going to do it. There was no anaesthetic. I said to them 'it doesn't feel right, stop it, what's going on, I don't want to do it', but nobody responded to me in any way."

She told the hearing: "I would never use the word stillborn. He was not stillborn, he was decapitated."

Dr Laxman's lawyer Gerard Boyle addressed the mother during the hearing and said: "Dr Laxman has asked me to say she is so very sorry and deeply saddened for the outcome of your baby.

"She knows that no amount of words can or will soften your pain but she is hoping that knowing that what she was trying to do was her very best to deliver your baby quickly and sufficiently and she had best intentions at heart."

https://www.straitstimes.com/world/...tated-baby-in-mothers-womb-while-carrying-out
 

Sir_Fcuk

Lunch Corporal
Loyal
6a00d83451b52369e2014e60490cd4970c-450wi


Janil: "I no need serve NS because I saved lives." This shitskin looks like he is about to commit ra....
 

Shut Up you are Not MM

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is the mother's fault. Who asked her CB to grab hold of the head and don't let go when the rest of body already gone out? You can not blame doctor for pulling the baby out by leg, because she gave birth to such a breech position. When pulled on the legs of baby her CB must let go and push out not pull back. The mother is the one who killed the baby pulling the head off with her CB! Blamed doctor for fuck?

Doctor only pulled the legs, her CB did the other half of the pull. The legs did not break so doctor did not killed the baby. CB pulled the baby's head off! Doctor can not do anything because head still inside CB.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is the mother's fault. Who asked her CB to grab hold of the head and don't let go when the rest of body already gone out? You can not blame doctor for pulling the baby out by leg, because she gave birth to such a breech position. When pulled on the legs of baby her CB must let go and push out not pull back. The mother is the one who killed the baby pulling the head off with her CB! Blamed doctor for fuck?


Doctor only pulled the legs, her CB did the other half of the pull. The legs did not break so doctor did not killed the baby. CB pulled the baby's head off! Doctor can not do anything because head still inside CB.

Cottonmouth would have ripped the chee bye apart to save the baby.
 

grandtour

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.straitstimes.com/world/...tated-baby-in-mothers-womb-while-carrying-out

British doctor accidentally decapitated baby in mother's womb while carrying out delivery

d1.jpg

Dr Vaishnavy Laxman allegedly ignored advice while carrying out a delivery, leading to the decapitation of an unborn baby in the womb. PHOTO: CAVENDISH PRESS

Published
May 11, 2018, 2:02 pm SGT
Ng Huiwen

A British consultant gynaecologist could be struck off the medical register for decapitating an unborn baby in the womb, while she was carrying out a delivery for a 30-year-old mother in 2014.

Dr Vaishnavy Laxman, 41, attended to the mother with a team of doctors at the Ninewells Hospital in Dundee on March 16, 2014, when the tragedy occurred.

According to British media reports, Dr Laxman should have performed an emergency caesarean section, as the premature infant was in a breech position.

However, she allegedly ignored advice and carried out a natural delivery.

The mother, known only as Patient A during Thursday's (May 10) hearing by the British Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service in Manchester, was told to push while traction was applied to the baby's legs.

As a result of this, the infant's legs, arms and torso became detached from the head, reported The Guardian.

Two other doctors later carried out a caesarean section to remove the baby's head, before it was reattached to his body, so that his mother could hold him to say goodbye.

The Telegraph reported that the mother had come face to face with Dr Laxman during the hearing.

"I don't forgive you - I don't forgive you," she said, as she looked at Dr Laxman, who has denied contributing to the death of the baby.

According to The Telegraph, the mother's water had broken early at 25 weeks and upon examination, her unborn baby was found to have a prolapsed cord. The infant was in a breech position, while the mother's cervix was around 2cm to 3cm dilated.

But it was revealed at the hearing that it has not been established whether the mother was in labour.

Recounting her ordeal, the mother said that she was told in an earlier scan that her son would be delivered by caesarean section.

But when she was taken to the labour suite, nobody had told her what was happening, she claimed.

"I was not given gas and air - I was in pain. I had the doctors putting their hands inside me and I had them pushing on my stomach and then pulling me down," she said.

"I tried to get off the bed but they pulled me back three times and just said they had to get the baby out.

"They twice tried to cut my cervix and nobody told me they were going to do it. There was no anaesthetic. I said to them 'it doesn't feel right, stop it, what's going on, I don't want to do it', but nobody responded to me in any way."

She told the hearing: "I would never use the word stillborn. He was not stillborn, he was decapitated."

Dr Laxman's lawyer Gerard Boyle addressed the mother during the hearing and said: "Dr Laxman has asked me to say she is so very sorry and deeply saddened for the outcome of your baby.

"She knows that no amount of words can or will soften your pain but she is hoping that knowing that what she was trying to do was her very best to deliver your baby quickly and sufficiently and she had best intentions at heart."
 

grandtour

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.straitstimes.com/world/...tated-baby-in-mothers-womb-while-carrying-out

British doctor accidentally decapitated baby in mother's womb while carrying out delivery

d1.jpg

Dr Vaishnavy Laxman allegedly ignored advice while carrying out a delivery, leading to the decapitation of an unborn baby in the womb.PHOTO: CAVENDISH PRESS

Published
May 11, 2018, 2:02 pm SGT
Ng Huiwen

A British consultant gynaecologist could be struck off the medical register for decapitating an unborn baby in the womb, while she was carrying out a delivery for a 30-year-old mother in 2014.

Dr Vaishnavy Laxman, 41, attended to the mother with a team of doctors at the Ninewells Hospital in Dundee on March 16, 2014, when the tragedy occurred.

According to British media reports, Dr Laxman should have performed an emergency caesarean section, as the premature infant was in a breech position.

However, she allegedly ignored advice and carried out a natural delivery.

The mother, known only as Patient A during Thursday's (May 10) hearing by the British Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service in Manchester, was told to push while traction was applied to the baby's legs.

As a result of this, the infant's legs, arms and torso became detached from the head, reported The Guardian.

Two other doctors later carried out a caesarean section to remove the baby's head, before it was reattached to his body, so that his mother could hold him to say goodbye.

The Telegraph reported that the mother had come face to face with Dr Laxman during the hearing.

"I don't forgive you - I don't forgive you," she said, as she looked at Dr Laxman, who has denied contributing to the death of the baby.

According to The Telegraph, the mother's water had broken early at 25 weeks and upon examination, her unborn baby was found to have a prolapsed cord. The infant was in a breech position, while the mother's cervix was around 2cm to 3cm dilated.

But it was revealed at the hearing that it has not been established whether the mother was in labour.

Recounting her ordeal, the mother said that she was told in an earlier scan that her son would be delivered by caesarean section.

But when she was taken to the labour suite, nobody had told her what was happening, she claimed.

"I was not given gas and air - I was in pain. I had the doctors putting their hands inside me and I had them pushing on my stomach and then pulling me down," she said.

"I tried to get off the bed but they pulled me back three times and just said they had to get the baby out.

"They twice tried to cut my cervix and nobody told me they were going to do it. There was no anaesthetic. I said to them 'it doesn't feel right, stop it, what's going on, I don't want to do it', but nobody responded to me in any way."

She told the hearing: "I would never use the word stillborn. He was not stillborn, he was decapitated."

Dr Laxman's lawyer Gerard Boyle addressed the mother during the hearing and said: "Dr Laxman has asked me to say she is so very sorry and deeply saddened for the outcome of your baby.

"She knows that no amount of words can or will soften your pain but she is hoping that knowing that what she was trying to do was her very best to deliver your baby quickly and sufficiently and she had best intentions at heart."
 
Top