• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

BREAKING! WP's internal projection - Real Risk of Losing all Seats in Next GE

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If Chen Show Mao were to defect with his supporters to Progress Singapore Party.-that's it.
Will allow a new start and avoid being bogged down by the court case which is an unwanted distraction
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
If Chen Show Mao were to defect with his supporters to Progress Singapore Party.-that's it.
Will allow a new start and avoid being bogged down by the court case which is an unwanted distraction
Few years back people here saying all oppies should close shop, join and contest under WP, so fast WP no good anymore new one better? This is why oppies should not give advice on the internet. :rolleyes:
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
unless another JBJ or Francis material is standing, I'm telling my kakis to support Ah Bock.
I will support ah bock...but his popularity is in the West n his old seat is under tartman. N tartman is damn popular...but to make way for the 4 G leaders...he might have to step down...with tartman out of the picture. It will be good for ah bock. But will tat be enough to get ah bock above the line?
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Few years back people here saying all oppies should close shop, join and contest under WP, so fast WP no good anymore new one better? This is why oppies should not give advice on the internet. :rolleyes:
We need a party that can take down the PAP in every way. First, that party must demand that the Election Department be independent of the government. Secondly, the election must be conducted with international monitors.
If the PAP does not agree to those terms, I hope there will be massive protests or chaos. The PAP must be brought down to their knees; it is time to make them realize that sinkees are the bosses.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
We need a party that can take down the PAP in every way. First, that party must demand that the Election Department be independent of the government. Secondly, the election must be conducted with international monitors.
If the PAP does not agree to those terms, I hope there will be massive protests or chaos. The PAP must be brought down to their knees; it is time to make them realize that sinkees are the bosses.
it is concocted to take down wp.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
WP has shown itself to be pretty useless in hold the government accountable. The government did as it pleases and even bullied the WP. So, what's the point of having a toothless opposition in Parliament?
A good opposition would have given the government endless headaches, asking the government lots of questions and challenging the answers. The opposition would point out the flaw of this government. It is not the opposition role to offer constructive criticism. The criticism should hurt and make the government be on their toes.
 

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal
WP has shown itself to be pretty useless in hold the government accountable. The government did as it pleases and even bullied the WP. So, what's the point of having a toothless opposition in Parliament?
A good opposition would have given the government endless headaches, asking the government lots of questions and challenging the answers. The opposition would point out the flaw of this government. It is not the opposition role to offer constructive criticism. The criticism should hurt and make the government be on their toes.
This is how WP should check the Government in Parliament:
 

whoami

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
WP has shown itself to be pretty useless in hold the government accountable. The government did as it pleases and even bullied the WP. So, what's the point of having a toothless opposition in Parliament?
A good opposition would have given the government endless headaches, asking the government lots of questions and challenging the answers. The opposition would point out the flaw of this government. It is not the opposition role to offer constructive criticism. The criticism should hurt and make the government be on their toes.

Yes. Only late JBJ could give MIW headaches in parliament. WP just plain wayang party.
 
Top