-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Bloke rips LGBT Pride flag off food counter at Lau Pa Sat and fucked the staff
- Thread starter Balls2U
- Start date
I congratulate the man in doing his best to ensure that Singapore's laws are upheld.
Section 377A specifically states that homosexuality is a crime and that arsehole bandits are liable for jail time for acts which are against the order of nature.
Give him a medal!
Section 377A specifically states that homosexuality is a crime and that arsehole bandits are liable for jail time for acts which are against the order of nature.
Give him a medal!
I'm still coming to terms on how can one man put his cock into another man's ass and derives pleasure from it.
Last edited:
The anus (sphincter) muscle is tighter than the vaginal grip offered by most adult women, especially those who had given birth.
Unfortunately, anal sex requires artificial lubricants, and ironically, this product could work well:
Reading the multiple politically correct comments posted on their FB made me realised our society has truly gone to the dogs.
Man rips LGBT Pride flag off grain bowl restaurant counter, hurls abuse at staff at Lau Pa Sat outlet - The Online Citizen Asia
A CCTV footage of a man ripping a small Pride flag off the counter of a food outlet has surfaced on social media, sparking shock and outrage among many commenters.
Grain bowl restaurant SMOL Singapore on Monday (18 January) took to Facebook to share the footage of the incident, which took place at its Lau Pa Sat outlet in the afternoon the same day.
Upon entering Food Folks, the retail space in which SMOL is located, the man proceeded to stop before approaching staff at the counter.
According to SMOL, the man had asked the staff member what the flag represents, to which the staff member replied that it is a sign of support for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community.
The man then momentarily left the counter in a disgruntled manner before walking back and angrily telling the SMOL staff that “not everybody supports LGBT” and questioning them how they could display the Pride flag at a “public food court”.
He then ripped the flag off the counter and had forcefully flung it against one of the staff members. The man had allegedly told the staff: “You are the kind of people who are destroying Singapore! Go to hell!”
Charmaine Low, who owns SMOL, in the Facebook post yesterday said that the incident with the man “was an unfortunate incident with someone who was not interested in having a peaceful conversation, but who believed that he had the right to abuse and use force against our staff”.
“It is also a reminder that discrimination against LGBTQ people in Singapore is well and alive, and there is so much more work to be done to promote understanding, love and tolerance for this community,” she said.
Despite the incident, Ms Low said that it “will not stop displaying our little pride flag” at its outlets to support the LGBT community, in line with utilising the business as “as a platform to amplify the voices of those who are not heard”.
She also called on other homegrown small and medium enterprises to show their support for the LGBT community “in their own ways”.
Many commenters urged SMOL to report the incident to the police, saying that the man’s actions were a form of assault and harassment.
One commenter questioned how “a flag and a show of solidarity to a marginalised group of people” will “destroy our country”.
They added that the man has the choice to not patronise a private establishment if he does not support its policies.
One commenter said that people should not “resort to violent antics and bad behavior” even if they disagree with certain individuals and establishments’ policies.
“I am against straight parents letting their children run wild and behaving unruly in public spaces. But hey, I don’t go around picking them up and throwing them down the recycle bins,” they quipped.
One commenter urged the public to “constantly call out such homophobic behaviour” as such behaviour might go beyond targeting the LGBT community in the future.
There “could very well be” other minority groups that could be subject to scorn and discrimination such as people of different religions, interracial couples, single mothers and even the underprivileged, they said.
The commenter, like several others, also said that they will begin to frequent SMOL from now on for their strong stance on supporting the LGBT community.
While it is not known what prompted the man to initiate the abusive actions seen in the footage, Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam in March last year had announced new amendments to the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act which protect LGBT persons against religiously-motivated violence.
In a Facebook post regarding the matter, Mr Shanmugam said: “Everyone should feel safe in Singapore. We will not tolerate any threats made to physical safety.”
“No one should threaten someone because they were LGBTQ; and likewise, no one should threaten someone else, because of religious affiliation,” he added.
While Mr Shanmugam in June last year topped NGO Sayoni’s Rainbow Scorecard for his engagement with LGBT groups, activists have criticised Mr Shanmugam and other top leaders in government for a seeming lack of urgency in enacting laws that guarantee legal and social protections for LGBT people such as housing and marriage rights.
Journalist Kirsten Han opined that the praise handed to Mr Shanmugam by certain segments of Singapore society regarding LGBT issues serve as “a slap in the face to people” such as a trans woman she previously interviewed, who — together with her wife — lost their home after their marriage was declared void on the grounds of her gender transition.
The trans woman and her wife were also denied the BTO flat they had paid a deposit for as a result of the voided marriage.
“It is a slap in the face to people like her when politicians from the very party in power are feted for supporting trans people, while she’d been put through hell,” said Han.
Civil rights activist and social worker Jolovan Wham –- among others –- argued that People’s Action Party (PAP) politicians such as Mr Shanmugam need “to be held to a higher standard” as they have greater power “to change things” with regards to LGBT rights in Singapore with a smaller risk to themselves than those in alternative parties.
“The consequences of someone like Shanmugam or TCJ [Tan Chuan-Jin] making LGBT affirmative statements is significantly different from opposition party figures like Paul Tambyah or Kenneth Jeyaretnam. We cannot assume a level political playing field in evaluating their position on LGBT issues,” said Mr Wham.
Share this:
A CCTV footage of a man ripping a small Pride flag off the counter of a food outlet has surfaced on social media, sparking shock and outrage among many commenters.
Grain bowl restaurant SMOL Singapore on Monday (18 January) took to Facebook to share the footage of the incident, which took place at its Lau Pa Sat outlet in the afternoon the same day.
Upon entering Food Folks, the retail space in which SMOL is located, the man proceeded to stop before approaching staff at the counter.
According to SMOL, the man had asked the staff member what the flag represents, to which the staff member replied that it is a sign of support for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community.
The man then momentarily left the counter in a disgruntled manner before walking back and angrily telling the SMOL staff that “not everybody supports LGBT” and questioning them how they could display the Pride flag at a “public food court”.
He then ripped the flag off the counter and had forcefully flung it against one of the staff members. The man had allegedly told the staff: “You are the kind of people who are destroying Singapore! Go to hell!”
Charmaine Low, who owns SMOL, in the Facebook post yesterday said that the incident with the man “was an unfortunate incident with someone who was not interested in having a peaceful conversation, but who believed that he had the right to abuse and use force against our staff”.
“It is also a reminder that discrimination against LGBTQ people in Singapore is well and alive, and there is so much more work to be done to promote understanding, love and tolerance for this community,” she said.
Despite the incident, Ms Low said that it “will not stop displaying our little pride flag” at its outlets to support the LGBT community, in line with utilising the business as “as a platform to amplify the voices of those who are not heard”.
She also called on other homegrown small and medium enterprises to show their support for the LGBT community “in their own ways”.
Many commenters urged SMOL to report the incident to the police, saying that the man’s actions were a form of assault and harassment.
One commenter questioned how “a flag and a show of solidarity to a marginalised group of people” will “destroy our country”.
They added that the man has the choice to not patronise a private establishment if he does not support its policies.
One commenter said that people should not “resort to violent antics and bad behavior” even if they disagree with certain individuals and establishments’ policies.
“I am against straight parents letting their children run wild and behaving unruly in public spaces. But hey, I don’t go around picking them up and throwing them down the recycle bins,” they quipped.
One commenter urged the public to “constantly call out such homophobic behaviour” as such behaviour might go beyond targeting the LGBT community in the future.
There “could very well be” other minority groups that could be subject to scorn and discrimination such as people of different religions, interracial couples, single mothers and even the underprivileged, they said.
The commenter, like several others, also said that they will begin to frequent SMOL from now on for their strong stance on supporting the LGBT community.
While it is not known what prompted the man to initiate the abusive actions seen in the footage, Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam in March last year had announced new amendments to the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act which protect LGBT persons against religiously-motivated violence.
In a Facebook post regarding the matter, Mr Shanmugam said: “Everyone should feel safe in Singapore. We will not tolerate any threats made to physical safety.”
“No one should threaten someone because they were LGBTQ; and likewise, no one should threaten someone else, because of religious affiliation,” he added.
While Mr Shanmugam in June last year topped NGO Sayoni’s Rainbow Scorecard for his engagement with LGBT groups, activists have criticised Mr Shanmugam and other top leaders in government for a seeming lack of urgency in enacting laws that guarantee legal and social protections for LGBT people such as housing and marriage rights.
Journalist Kirsten Han opined that the praise handed to Mr Shanmugam by certain segments of Singapore society regarding LGBT issues serve as “a slap in the face to people” such as a trans woman she previously interviewed, who — together with her wife — lost their home after their marriage was declared void on the grounds of her gender transition.
The trans woman and her wife were also denied the BTO flat they had paid a deposit for as a result of the voided marriage.
“It is a slap in the face to people like her when politicians from the very party in power are feted for supporting trans people, while she’d been put through hell,” said Han.
Civil rights activist and social worker Jolovan Wham –- among others –- argued that People’s Action Party (PAP) politicians such as Mr Shanmugam need “to be held to a higher standard” as they have greater power “to change things” with regards to LGBT rights in Singapore with a smaller risk to themselves than those in alternative parties.
“The consequences of someone like Shanmugam or TCJ [Tan Chuan-Jin] making LGBT affirmative statements is significantly different from opposition party figures like Paul Tambyah or Kenneth Jeyaretnam. We cannot assume a level political playing field in evaluating their position on LGBT issues,” said Mr Wham.
Share this:
Since singkieland is big on rule of law etc. Why is 377A not implemented and enforced?
I have tried screwing women in the butt hole. Very tight and shiok. But doing it to a bloke?
Then why isn't Pinky in jail? Cross his legs like a guniang. Shake other people's hand like a guniang. Where pink like a guniang. Must be a guniang
I have tried screwing women in the butt hole. Very tight and shiok. But doing it to a bloke?
Take turns lah, you fuck his backside, then he fucks your backside later. It's all about give and take.
A woman cannot fuck your backside, unless she uses a strap-on to peg you. But many women are squeamish about 'unorthodox' sexual practices, even oral sex disgusts them.
Camelbook idiot i bet. Those brianwashed fools are mindless. Ask why he did not circumcise
and yet, there are certain people who can do it on animals!!!
In a shocking incident, a kitten was reportedly raped by a 15-year-old teenager and 6 of his friends for over a week in Lahore, Pakistan. The information about the gruesome incident was shared on Sunday by a Pakistan-based NGO named JFK Animal Rescue and Shelter.
Reportedly, following animal abuse, the cat could not eat, sit, or sleep due to trauma. The veterinary doctors had recovered sperm samples and plastic bags from the animal’s body. According to them, the rape was so brutal that there was virtually no separation between the anal and the vaginal region. The post read that the abuse had damaged the kitten’s internal parts so severely that sperm and blood kept on leaking. Multiple plastic bags, allegedly used by the boys to rape the animal, were found in her body by the veterinarian.
read #18 above
Can I fly, wear or display an anti lgbtq and conservative flag in public?
Oh wait .. the nazi and isis flags are banned
Oh wait .. the nazi and isis flags are banned
Similar threads
