Black dog Sham endorses Ben Leong

[Valium]

What a mutual masturbatory show!

 

[A Singaporean]

Running dog of PAP

 

[zeddy]

He will soon be invited to PAP tea party.

 

[Confuseous]

Fellow Members of the mutual admiration society.

 

[yobyella]

Jiuhukia?

 

[Leongsam]

I'm happy to see that there are many out there who realise just what a fantastic job the PAP had done.

That is why the deaths in Singapore have been so low.

 

[a_korusawa]

sigh, another running dog
it is so desperately obvious !!!

 

[laksaboy]

No biggie. The local academia fraternity is infested with PAP cronies. Trust me on this.

 

[sweetiepie]

I'm happy to see that there are many out there who realise just what a fantastic job the PAP had done.

That is why the deaths in Singapore have been so low.

KNN my uncle think Ben leong does not fit to be a professor KNN talk so much no use KNN my uncle can simply beat him to a puppy by saying KNN when a responsible govt has not enough mask it will explain to the people to prevent panic and advise them to make their own mask instead of lying that mask is not necessary and worse is to say i give you 1 each to feel shiok shiok and now it becomes no mask teo fine until govt shiok shiok KNN

 

[sweetiepie]

KNN my uncle think Ben leong does not fit to be a professor KNN talk so much no use KNN my uncle can simply beat him to a puppy by saying KNN when a responsible govt has not enough mask it will explain to the people to prevent panic and advise them to make their own mask instead of lying that mask is not necessary and worse is to say i give you 1 each to feel shiok shiok and now it becomes no mask teo fine until govt shiok shiok KNN

KNN my uncle also will tel him KNN take 3 secs to think if govt scare causing panic due to insufficient mask they also surely will scare cause panic and dare not say cpf is empty gai KNN

 

[KuanTi01]

Fellow Members of the mutual admiration society.

Some call it the mutual masturbation society!

 

[sweetiepie]

That’s why we’re the gold standard. What does that mean? That means that even though we know there are likely some infected people that we haven’t yet identified and caught, we don’t expect them to be many. Conservatively, let’s say 100. With hindsight, that might be too small, but at *that* point, that’s as good as it gets.
What is 100? Roughly, that’s probably the number of MediaCorp actors and actresses we have? I suspect MediaCorp has more. How often do you get to meet Zoe Tay or Fann Wong? I have never seen them in person in my life.
Note that you can only catch COVID from someone who has been infected. If there are only 100 of them running around, your probability of getting hemorrhoids is likely higher.

Nbcb KNN what kind of lanjiao nus professor is ben leong KNN no wonder nus produces grads giving bank account lumber to strangers KNN
According to ben means everyone won't get it mare KNN simi lj probability KNN you think you wont get he think he wont get who will get KNN and to compare with piles is fucking stoopid when piles wont kill you even gan shiok bin got piles KNN

 

[Loofydralb]

Playing his cards right, this dog is aiming for a position in the Admin service. He has no credibility unless he categorically declare he will not join the civil service.

Watch him give his excuses.

 

[JiuHuKia]

Your sham is only fit to flip prata if he is born in Malaysia.

 

[Valium]

Your sham is only fit to flip prata if he is born in Malaysia.

He can flip @ginfreely's breasts.

 

[syed putra]

Its typical for Chinese to deflect theur fault wrt virus onto Bangladeshi workers.

 

[nirvarq]

KNN Sweetiepie and LaoTzu Engerish also better than him XiaSuey porlumpar kia people already said been prepared for 17yrs since SARS and No need wear mask is take gamble b'cos not enough stocks.

 

[konigsberg]

Mr Leong got his facts and numbers mixed up.

What he is saying is this:

Singapore actual death rate = 0.075%

Rightfully, US death rate
= 2 or 3 times S’pore’s (Ben Leong arbitrary 1st principle)
= 2 or 3 X 0.075%
= 0.15% or 0.225% which he rounded to 0.2%

US officially reported death rate = 6%

Based on his calculations, Mr Leong should have concluded:

Since 6% (official US death rate) is 30X of 0.2% (theoretical US death rate), US officially reported dealth rate (6%) is 30X worse than what the situation should be in US (0.2%).

At this stage Mr Leong doesn’t pause to reflect on the numbers he has gotten. Why would US officially report a death rate 30X worse than it really is? President Donald Trump eager to look bad rather than look good?

Instead, Mr Leong concluded the opposite. He concluded the US situation could potentially be 30X worse than US official reported death rate.

What kind of mixed up first principle is this? Do all the calculations only to conclude the other way?

 

[konigsberg]

Having established that the infected number may not be the actual infected number as it merely reflects the number of persons tested, it is bewildering that Mr Leong would go on to use “every 10,000 infected” to do analysis.

If infected number isn’t reliable, would deaths per infected number be reliable?

Putting an unreliable number into the denominator would magically make it reliable? What silly first principle is that?