I am not sure if there are any current models of valuations that can be applied to any crypto that is not backed by an issuing institution or like gold, silver, equities or other investment grade instruments has an underlying value.
Crypto at the moment is driven by acceptance and demand. The moment it is no longer acceptable it’s tits up. An equity has underlying assets such as company premises, IP, goodwill etc.
Bitcoin’s acceptance is driven by transparency and accountability provided by Blockchain and the fact that it’s is extremely costly to mine. Note the use of the word “mine” as in extraction similar to precious minerals and the value determined by its limited availability and cost of extraction.
For argument sake, if someone introduces a new savvy crypto whose attributes supersedes Bitcoin, it is likely that Bitcoin will be worthless.
I am sure people who acquire Bitcoin will be converting to known asset quality items such as land, property, USD, gold, equity in batches as new highs are reached. As it cannot be accepted currently as store of value.
Though not a scam or pyramid scheme as suggested by some, I doubt it can be valued conventionally besides the rudimentary intrinsic value.
Those in the future market have no interest in its value or its ability to act as store of value. There intention is another to trade - margins, scalping, pennies. I will be surprised if long positions are held.
Nevertheless these are interesting times and I am sure Cryto does have a place. One must also concede the genius in Satoshi and in the way he completes the picture - the painful algorithm, the hash approach, the distributed ledger, the wallet, the exchange mechanism, the ability to account for every coin and the brilliant transparency etc.
Crypto at the moment is driven by acceptance and demand. The moment it is no longer acceptable it’s tits up. An equity has underlying assets such as company premises, IP, goodwill etc.
Bitcoin’s acceptance is driven by transparency and accountability provided by Blockchain and the fact that it’s is extremely costly to mine. Note the use of the word “mine” as in extraction similar to precious minerals and the value determined by its limited availability and cost of extraction.
For argument sake, if someone introduces a new savvy crypto whose attributes supersedes Bitcoin, it is likely that Bitcoin will be worthless.
I am sure people who acquire Bitcoin will be converting to known asset quality items such as land, property, USD, gold, equity in batches as new highs are reached. As it cannot be accepted currently as store of value.
Though not a scam or pyramid scheme as suggested by some, I doubt it can be valued conventionally besides the rudimentary intrinsic value.
Those in the future market have no interest in its value or its ability to act as store of value. There intention is another to trade - margins, scalping, pennies. I will be surprised if long positions are held.
Nevertheless these are interesting times and I am sure Cryto does have a place. One must also concede the genius in Satoshi and in the way he completes the picture - the painful algorithm, the hash approach, the distributed ledger, the wallet, the exchange mechanism, the ability to account for every coin and the brilliant transparency etc.
My opinion is that the intrinsic value of bitcoin should be the total volume of future transactions, discounted by advances in computing power per unit of electrical energy consumption. I am basing this on the usual model for valuing equities, which is the sum total of future earnings after tax, discounted by the time value of money.
If more companies accept bitcoin as payment, its value should increase. Similarly if computers advance like they always have, then bitcoin should decline over time, ceteris paribus.
The trouble is in determining how receptive companies will be to accepting bitcoin as payment as time goes by. But the same problem lies in estimating the future earning potential of any company. I don't see either as a particularly easy task.