Bitch thinks men cannot film her in public

[Timerty]

 

[syed putra]

Why didn't uncle browse Instagram? Less hassle.

 

[laksaboy]

I've been taken photos and videos by tourists at the touristy spots so many times.

This outrage is nothing more that delulu toxic feminist ideology, which declares that all men are oppressors, potential rapists, sexually objectifying women. Always up to no good. All 臭男人.

To these crazy women, stare at them too long and it becomes 'visual rape'. They also create anti-male terms such as 'mansplaining' or 'manspreading'.

It all boils down to insecurity from a childhood with a abusive, unloving or emotionally distant father. Or there was no father. That resentment carries over to adulthood.

 

[Scrooball (clone)]

Why didn't uncle browse Instagram? Less hassle.

Same as why don’t go swimming pool to see women showing more la. Some like the kick!

 

[VanDick]

Its a public place. So that fucktard uncle is free to take photos as he wishes. Also, his mobile phone is his private property. He has every right to reject that bitch's request to see it.

 

[k1976]

Which Samster is that?
Caught in HDBee Hardland??

 

[k1976]

Its a public place. So that fucktard uncle is free to take photos as he wishes. Also, his mobile phone is his private property. He has every right to reject that bitch's request to see it.

Uncker just need to show her his Masarati , XMM will give him some private exclusive time?

Right , Cik Syed and True Believer?

 

[k1976]

In Singapore, it is generally not against the law to take photos or videos of someone (including a girl or woman) in a public place without their consent. Individuals do not have an inherent expectation of privacy regarding their likeness when they are in a public space. [1, 2, 3]
However, the act becomes a criminal offense under the Singapore Penal Code if it crosses specific boundaries into voyeurism, harassment, or public nuisance. [1, 2]

When it Crosses the Line into a Crime

• • Voyeurism (Section 377BB): Taking upskirt or downblouse photos is strictly illegal. It is an offense to capture images of a person's genital region, breasts, or buttocks (covered or exposed) without consent if those areas are not otherwise visible. This carries a penalty of up to 2 years in prison, a fine, caning, or a combination of these. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • Harassment (POHA): Following or targeting someone continuously can violate the Protection from Harassment Act (POHA). If the photography is done intentionally to cause alarm, distress, or harassment to the individual, the photographer can be prosecuted or sued. [1, 2]
  • Public Nuisance: Causing a public disruption or acting in a way that compromises public decency can lead to arrest under the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act. [1]

Commercial Use and Data Protection
If the photo is taken for commercial purposes or business marketing, Singapore's Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) applies. Under the PDPA, a recognizable face constitutes personal data, meaning organizations generally require explicit consent before collecting, using, or publishing the photo. The PDPA does not, however, apply to individuals acting in a personal or domestic capacity. [1]
If you are dealing with a specific situation, let me know if the photo was taken for commercial use, if the person felt harassed, or if the camera was aimed intimately. I can provide more tailored legal context.

 

[Dongyi]

This uncle isn't as eloquent as @eatshitndie. If he'd gone to ACS, he might have had enough "English power" to hold his own against an Ah Lian.

 

[k1976]

This uncle isn't as eloquent as @eatshitndie. If he'd gone to ACS, he might have had enough "English power" to hold his own against an Ah Lian.

No need lah, use ChatGPt, it is on your finger tips

 

[Dongyi]

Uncle: "I cannot take photo of you but what are you doing now? You can take video of me?"

Uncle 被霸凌了！

 

[k1976]

This uncle isn't as eloquent as @eatshitndie. If he'd gone to ACS, he might have had enough "English power" to hold his own against an Ah Lian.

Uncker must be from New Kanpong Sec Sekola?

 

[k1976]

That’s why Chiobu must wear like A ninja turtle costume to make sure, no Uncker can take photo at their Kar Cheng while skirting the legal boundary of Section 377BB

 

[laksaboy]

Look at this IG post of hers. She shamelessly sexualizes herself, then blames you if you look.

Men do not sexualize women, women do that to themselves.

 

[k1976]

Look at this IG post of hers. She shamelessly sexualizes herself, then blames you if you look.

Men do not sexualize women, women do that to themselves.

U need to question her intentions why she make the video and post the Uncker online mah…bring more public awareness on peepur are bio-ing her

Her gym beedio are not catching enough eyeball traffic

 

[k1976]

I wonder what happen if the Uncker us ACS trained?

 

[k1976]

Look at this IG post of hers. She shamelessly sexualizes herself, then blames you if you look.

Men do not sexualize women, women do that to themselves.

hahaha…this young lady also bijar her own lobang

 

[k1976]

Look at this IG post of hers. She shamelessly sexualizes herself, then blames you if you look.

Men do not sexualize women, women do that to themselves.

good observation, Bro

 

[DaoMa]

Fucking slut. If instead of uncle, its a handsome guy taking picture, she would even strip and ask the man to lick her tits

 

[WangChuk]

unker no need take photo lah ... got weedio in her IG to see and pcc lah ...