• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Beta Sinkie Sorry That He Took Videos Of Women Peeing! Sorry Sorry! Merry Xmas!! Guess Race!

Fiery_Arson

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...ctim-tampines-toilet-video-recording-11073684

Singapore Police clarify claims by victim in Tampines toilet video recording case

Exterior of NTUC Income Tampines Junction. (Photo: Google Street View)

30 Dec 2018 06:37PM (Updated: 30 Dec 2018 06:40PM)
Share this content


Bookmark


SINGAPORE: The police on Sunday (Dec 30) clarified two points raised by the woman who had alleged that a man had filmed her while she was in the cubicle of a female washroom in Tampines.
The man, 30, was arrested on Wednesday.



In a Facebook post on Sunday (Dec 30), the Singapore Police Force noted that the woman, Ms Emilia Chong, has claimed that police officers who attended to her case did not arrest the man immediately but viewed CCTV footage first.
They also noted that Ms Chong had claimed that she was told the man could be let off with a warning.
"In fact, the police officers had detained the man (so that he could not run away) before proceeding to conduct preliminary investigations, which included viewing CCTV footage and interviewing witnesses, to establish if there was prima facie evidence of the alleged offences," SPF said in a Facebook post.
"There being so, the police then proceeded to effect the arrest. These established procedures are to ensure fairness and impartiality towards all parties involved, including the alleged offender," they added.





As for Ms Chong's claim that an officer had said the man could be let off with just a warning, the police clarified that the officers had told her that the punishment for such offences could range from a stern warning to prosecution, depending on the facts of the case.
"The recommended punishment must be taken in consultation with the Attorney-General’s Chambers, and only after investigations have been completed. As such, at the point of arrest, the police officers would not have been able to determine the eventual course of action against the perpetrator."
These points have been clarified with Ms Chong, the SPF said.
"We treat all cases seriously. Anyone found to have committed an offence will be dealt with in accordance with the law," the police said.
"At the same time, justice requires us to also consider the rights of the alleged offender, and to take actions of arrest and prosecution only after appropriate investigations have been conducted," they added.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
don’t need to do that now in sf. both female and male toilets wide open for peeps and selfies to be taken.
553F54CB-ECC5-464F-B8D1-907F64332D9C.jpeg
 

ckmpd

Alfrescian
Loyal
Agree that justice must be fair to both. But do we sometimes see well connected alleged offenders let off leniently? So SPF and AGC please be professional and mete out justice fairly and not let off well connected people
 
Top