• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Bastard Japs will dump million tons of FUKUSHIMA NUKE WATER INTO OCEAN! 八格鸭路!

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
16X exceeded max level of allowed radioactive pollutant for dumping into ocean!

Hot Fukushima Nuke Said Cheer! KNN!


https://www.ft.com/content/f6e454ef-1b3c-4dda-8c3b-c4cc2e9669a9


Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email [email protected] to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.
https://www.ft.com/content/f6e454ef-1b3c-4dda-8c3b-c4cc2e9669a9

Accessibility help Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer Sign In Subscribe Open side navigation menu myFT Menu Financial Times Sign In Steer from crisis to recovery with the FT Fukushima nuclear accident Japan plans to release Fukushima water into Pacific Ocean Disposal of contaminated water from nuclear plant expected to provoke international concern Workers stand near storage tanks for contaminated water at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant © REUTERS Share on Twitter (opens new window) Share on Facebook (opens new window) Share on LinkedIn (opens new window) Share on Whatsapp (opens new window) Robin Harding in Tokyo October 16 2020 37 Japan is nearing a decision to release more than 1m tonnes of tritium-contaminated water from the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant into the Pacific, a move that threatens to provoke domestic and international criticism. According to local reports and officials briefed on the process, releasing the contaminated water into the ocean is regarded as the only viable option. The government is expected to make a decision within a month. Dumping contaminated water at sea will bring back some of the trauma of the nuclear accident nearly 10 years ago. But Japan’s government argues that tritium is released routinely by working nuclear reactors around the world, and that there is no risk to human health. “At present, the government has made no decisions on substance or timing,” said Katsunobu Kato, the chief cabinet secretary. “On the other hand . . . the reality is we can’t delay a decision on the treated water forever.” Three out of six reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi plant suffered meltdowns in March 2011 when a tsunami knocked out their cooling systems. Thousands of tonnes of water were pumped into the reactors as coolant and groundwater has continued to flow into the damaged structures, becoming contaminated with radioactive nuclides. Plant operator Tokyo Electric Power, known as Tepco, has stored more than 1m tonnes of this water in tanks at the site but it is running out of space. Officials said that capacity would run out by 2022, and with around two years needed to build equipment to discharge the water, a decision on how to handle it was urgent. Tepco has processed the water through a filtration plant and said it had removed almost all of the radioactive nuclides. But there is no effective technology to separate tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, the lightest element. Our fear is that it will have a severe impact and all the effort of fishermen [to recover from the Fukushima disaster] will go down the drain.” JF, an umbrella body for Japan’s fishing co-operatives Scientists advising the Japanese government looked at a range of options to deal with the water, including evaporating it into the atmosphere or injecting it into underground reservoirs. But diluting it and then releasing it into the ocean was judged the safest and most cost-effective approach. However, releasing the water is vehemently opposed by residents of Fukushima and by Japan’s fishermen, who faced export bans because of the nuclear accident. Fishing in waters near the Fukushima Daiichi plant is still restricted. JF, an umbrella body for Japan’s fishing co-operatives, told ministers that they were “absolutely against” releasing the water into the ocean. “We recognise that the handling of this water is a pressing and important national problem, but if this water is released into the ocean, we will suffer inevitable damage to our reputation,” the co-ops declared. “Our fear is that it will have a severe impact and all the effort of fishermen [to recover from the Fukushima disaster] will go down the drain.” South Korea has also criticised Tokyo’s plans to release the water. Japan had hoped to use the Tokyo Olympics to promote Fukushima’s recovery from the nuclear disaster, leaving a decision on the water until after the games, but the event was postponed until 2021 because of Covid-19. Get alerts on Fukushima nuclear accident when a new story is published Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2020. All rights reserved. Latest on Fukushima nuclear accident Jonathan Ford Net-zero world must conquer fear of nuclear power Japanese politics & policy Japan fears Seoul trying to undermine Tokyo Olympics Japan Former Tepco executives found not guilty in Fukushima case Special ReportFuture of Payments Digital purchases prove to be a piece of cake for UK bakery in pandemic Follow the topics in this article Fukushima nuclear accident Japanese politics & policy Robin Harding How easy or hard was it to use FT.com today? Useful links Support View Site Tips Help Centre About Us Accessibility myFT Tour Careers Legal & Privacy Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Cookies Copyright Slavery Statement & Policies Services Tools More from the FT Group Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2020. FT and ‘Financial Times’ are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd. The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice. Financial Times International Edition Search the FT Switch to UK Edition Top sections Home World US Companies Tech Markets Graphics Opinion Work & Careers Life & Arts Personal Finance How to Spend It Special Reports FT recommends Lex Alphaville Lunch with the FT FT Globetrotter #techAsia Moral Money FTfm Newsletters Video Podcasts News feed myFT Portfolio Today's Newspaper (ePaper) Crossword Our Apps Help Centre Subscribe Sign In
 
Top