baseless concession of hell Geneva Crap of war unharming civilians need abolishment

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 9, 2011
Messages
2,759
Points
48
The hell and harm of war must see only 2 types of human objects - friends or foes.

It should see no line of differentiation between military and civilian humans at all. This is meaningless and silly as well as imposible. Most people are participating in mixture of dual roles. Civilians are also hostile and contributing towards combat in strength and resources in wars. They are also family relation with the military personnels.

Most of all they are the prime source of human resources for the military. They are the prime reason for the military to fight for. They are the funders of the wars.

The civilians so called are big role and significant element of any war.

The work of civilians facilitate and enable their combatants to fight.

No concession of harms hurts and deaths of civilians are rightful at all.

Geneva Conventions is CRAP. ABOLISH this Crap.

Shooting civilian airliner is only a tiny part of it.

Civilian airliners are being used to freight significant supplies and resources as well as warriors.

SAF for example flies units to military trainings and exercises in civilian planes via civilian airport. So why can not attack these targets? Kiss my ass! US military also doing that.
 
Re: baseless concession of hell Geneva Crap of war unharming civilians need abolishme

Well said. I have added to your points.
 
Re: baseless concession of hell Geneva Crap of war unharming civilians need abolishme

The silly ideas and Geneva Convention are unacceptable as they hampers retards limits & soften the necessary effectiveness of war. Defeating the important purpose of war, which is to keep a balance by reducing human over population against the exhausting natural resources left on the planet earth. Abolish these rubbish and let wars really do it's works and settle business around the world.
 
Back
Top