Bad News, Pussies, There Really Is A Male Shortage!

[extramarital]

ATTENTION: HIGH VALUE ELIGIBLE MEN OUT THERE

Isaiah 4:1 is starting to come to past. The market value of pussies is dropping fast.

By Reed Tucker August 25, 2015 | 6:01

There are four young college-educated women to every three males in the US — a ratio that’s worse in NYC.


It’s not your fault. It’s the ratio.

To all the young, college-educated women out there who feel like Donald Trump will probably become president before they find a decent, eligible man, take comfort.

According to author Jon Birger, you’re not imagining things. In “Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game,” out today, Birger, a former writer for Fortune and Money magazines, crunched demographic, census and other data to show that it really is historically rough out there for the ladies.

After noticing that his single gal pals were always complaining that “guys were ignoring them or were toying with them,” Birger decided to investigate. Based on his research, here are eight reasons why women can’t find a man — and strategies for increasing their odds.

You’re looking in Manhattan

The island is great for, say, watching a cheesy musical or spending $300 on a bottle of vodka. But for dating? Not so much.

“Because women have been graduating from college in 30-plus percent greater numbers than men for years, there are now four women for every three men nationally in the marriage-age, college-educated dating market,” Birger says.

In Manhattan, the numbers are even more dire, with 38 percent more young female college grads than male. Birger says the imbalance is also exacerbated by New York’s large population of gay males. Some 9 to 12 percent of men in Manhattan are gay, according to Gary Gates, a demographics expert at UCLA’s Williams Institute.

Other cities especially brutal for single women are Houston; Providence, RI; and Raleigh, NC. Better options include Silicon Valley, San Francisco, San Diego and Columbus, Ohio. The Bay Area, for example, attracts programmers, computer scientists and engineers — fields that are disproportionately male.

You went to the wrong college

The average gender ratio among US undergrads is now 57 percent women to 43 percent men. And some universities are even less of a sausage fest. At NYU it’s 61 to 39. At Boston University, 62 to 38.

“Facebook did a study a few years ago on how couples met, and it turned out that 25 percent met their significant others in college or grad school,” Birger says. “What was interesting is that the men who met their wives in college were not the ones who attended colleges that were disproportionately female. They attended colleges that were majority male.”

Want to increase your chances of getting hitched? Head to Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (72 percent male) or Georgia Tech (66 percent), two institutions with way more guys than girls.

The men are playing you

“There’s a lot of social science showing that men behave differently in different relationship markets,” Birger says.

When faced with an oversupply of women, guys are more likely to delay marriage and play the field. Or, in other words, to act like guys.

And as reported by numerous publications, dating is out with young people and hookup culture is in. No need to wine and dine a potential mate when you can just swipe right. With the gender imbalance on college campuses, men are having a field day, and they may see no need to end their winning streak by settling down.

For women, however, the longer a girl settles for casual sex as opposed to a long-term relationship, the more chance she has of ending up alone.

You’re not issuing an ultimatum

“Ultimatums work in business and politics,” Birger says. “This notion that the only area of life you shouldn’t issue an ultimatum in is romance doesn’t make sense.”

Researcher John Molloy interviewed 3,000 couples right after they got their marriage licenses and found that 60 percent of the women were prepared to walk away if their guy suddenly declared he wasn’t ready.

You’re not making the first move

The aggressive women are the ones more likely to get the guy.

“I was talking about this with my rabbi, and he does premarital counseling,” Birger says. “Of the nine couples he had in counseling, seven of them shared a similar story: The guys all had several options, but they married the women who pursued them the most.”

And ladies, don’t worry about turning off guys by being too pushy.

“It’s a myth that men enjoy the chase,” Birger says.

You’re working in the wrong job

Slaving away in p.r., education, nursing, event planning or other female-dominant fields? Time to get a new job.

“Stanford sociologist Michael Rosenfeld reports that 10 percent of Americans meet their future spouses at work,” Birger says.

Some careers to consider: mechanical engineering (93 percent male), computer network administration (83 percent) and financial advising (74 percent).

You’re too religious

Consider dating a nonbeliever, even if it makes your grandma cry into her meat sauce.

“People who leave organized religion are disproportionately male,” Birger says. “Atheists and agnostics are also disproportionately male. An atheist meet-up would be a really good place to meet men.”

You’re too picky

“For the women who wait [to settle down], the dating pool gets much, much worse,” Birger says.

He likens it to a game of musical chairs. In the first round, fresh into the dating market, nearly every woman gets a chair. By the final round, the chances of losing soar to 50 percent.

For example, some 20 years ago a recent college-grad female confronted a dating market that had 117 recent college-grad men for every 100 women. Today that same woman, now 40, if still unmarried, faces a market in which nearly two-thirds of those formerly single men are hitched, and there are just 33 eligible men for every 50 women — 52 percent more women than men.

“None of this would matter if we were open-minded about who we dated,” Birger says. “The problem is, Americans — both men and women — have become more rigid about dating across socioeconomic boundaries.”

To find a mate, college-educated women should consider dating working-class men.

“In the future, we’re going to see more of what I call ‘mixed collar’ marriages,” Birger says.

http://nypost.com/2015/08/25/hey-ladies-here-are-8-reasons-youre-single/

 

[extramarital]

Perhaps self-proclaimed Princesses the world over should travel to Chinkna to marry poor Chink farmers from the countryside as there's a huge gender imbalance there that favors pussies!

 

[extramarital]

Isaiah 4:1: In that day so few men will be left that seven women will fight for each man, saying, "Let us all marry you! We will provide our own food and clothing. Only let us take your name so we won't be mocked as old maids."---New Living Translation

 

[mojito]

No. Because it is refering to New York. And university educated men. There are plenty of poverty striken Art majors flipping burgers at McDonalds'.

 

[Froggy]

Shows womwn are smarter - more women going to college education compared to men.

 

[extramarital]

No. Because it is refering to New York. And university educated men. There are plenty of poverty striken Art majors flipping burgers at McDonalds'.

That's why the value of pussies is dropping rapidly because more and more women will have to settle for lower value, lower status men like construction workers, cleaners, manual laborers, taxi drivers, bus drivers, truck drivers, security guards, fast food workers, garbage collectors, etc... instead of higher value, higher status men like investment bankers, doctors, accountants, engineers, lawyers, professors, middle and high ranking managers, successful entrepreneurs and investors.

There's still plenty of cocks out there at the moment. But most of them are of low value with low status which most college educated white collar self-proclaimed Princesses prefer not to date and marry.

It's all about supply and demand.

 

[mojito]

That's why the value of pussies is dropping rapidly because more and more women will have to settle for lower value, lower status men like construction workers, cleaners, manual laborers, taxi drivers, bus drivers, truck drivers, security guards, fast food workers, garbage collectors, etc... instead of higher value, higher status men like investment bankers, doctors, accountants, engineers, lawyers, professors, successful entrepreneurs and investors.

There's still plenty of cocks out there at the moment. But most of them are of low value with low status which most college educated white collar self-proclaimed Princesses prefer not to date.

It's all about supply and demand.

Now you know why we bring in the white collar foreigners and their Bollywood good looks. Supply and demand sir. Supply is limitless for a country of our size. The PAP only wants you to be happy.

 

[extramarital]

Now you know why we bring in the white collar foreigners and their Bollywood good looks. Supply and demand sir. Supply is limitless for a country of our size. The PAP only wants you to be happy.

It's more about the PAP wants women voters to be happy in order to stay in power.

 

[mojito]

It's more about the PAP wants women voters to be happy in order to stay in power.

Some people unhappy. Others a little happier. There is net happiness. It all works out fine.

 

[extramarital]

Yes, it’s true: Australia is experiencing a man drought


IF YOU’VE been feeling a little lonelier than usual and wondering if all the men have disappeared, the good news is, it’s not all in your head — the bad news is, you are right. The men HAVE disappeared.

Six out of Australia’s eight states and territories are currently experiencing a man drought, according to McCrindle Research — and there are almost 100,000 more women than men.

“The man drought is a demographic reality,” says Mark McCrindle, a social researcher and demographer who analysed the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ data on the ratio of men to women across Australia’s regions.

“Australia has 100,000 more females than males even though there are more male babies born than females, and there are more males than females until around age 35,” he said.

One of the reasons we have a man drought is because men are increasingly heading overseas to work.

“The man drought is most evident during the working years — people in their mid 30s to mid 60s — and is a sign of the global workforce flow and the propensity of Australian men to take advantage of overseas work opportunities,” he says.

When you hit your mid 70s, the man drought becomes far more evident “as the longevity of women exceeds that of men. By the mid 80s, there are 50 per cent more females than males.”

Hardest hit states include Tasmania, where every single town is experiencing a man drought, and Victoria.

If you live in Victoria, you are unfortunately in the epicentre of the man drought. The state has 98 males to every 100 females, which might not sound like a huge difference, but means that across the state there are 58,399 more women than men.

“With the second lowest fertility rate in Australia, there are fewer births in Victoria (which is the source of more males compared to females) and an older median age (a driver of more females to males)” explains Mr McCrindle.

“Victoria has no male dominated sectors such as mining or defence, and as a state that has been the provider of much of the mining labour in WA, it leads Australia in the man drought stakes.”

So if Victoria has supplied Western Australia with men for the mines, does that mean good ol’ WA is abounding in men? The short answer is: Yes.

“The reliance of states like WA and the NT on mining and the dominance of males to females in this sector (85 per cent to 15 per cent) is the reason that there are far more men than women here,” McCrindle says. In fact, in the NT, there are almost 111 males to every 100 females. In WA, there are 102 males for every 100 females.

“In addition, the dominance of Defence bases in the top end, and the younger average median age of these areas (the older the people, the more likely the man drought) drives these demographics” says McCrindle.

There are also pockets of men in other states across Australia. In NSW, head to Singleton, where there are 5 per cent more males than females — and their average age is 33.

Queensland’s Mt Isa has 12 per cent more males than females, while Spring Hill has 27 per cent more men than women.

Whyalla in South Australia is one of the few towns not experiencing a man drought, with 241 more men than women. There may be a man drought, but there are men out there.

So what would McCrindle say to the women who complain they can’t find a man? Two things:

1. Look for younger men: Men exceed women until age 36. In Australia brides are on average two years younger than grooms, and brides are marrying later (the average age of marriage for a female is 28, while a male is 30). However, if a 28-year-old female looks at males of the same (or slightly younger age), there are 103 males for every 100 females.

2. Look overseas: There are more than 70 countries with more males than females, including the Maldives and Samoa. Failing that, look interstate as our man drought map shows, but also look locally. Sometimes adjoining suburbs can have one with more males and the next with more females due to a quirk of employment, education and housing options in these specific suburbs.

Alternatively, you can always find solidarity in this:

I don't need a man
[video=youtube;qBsEF7Qx09o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBsEF7Qx09o[/video]

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/re...ng-a-man-drought/story-fnet0gly-1226823846037

 

[extramarital]

In Russia, a lack of men forces women to settle for less

The hardliving Russian lifestyle is thinning the male herd. What does it mean for love?

When Russia and China vote together on UN Resolutions (such as their recent veto of the UN Resolution on Syria), I always think to myself that in the two countries’ collective unconscious they realize that they are going to have to, literally, marry each other someday soon.

And here’s why. China has many more men than women. Russia has the opposite problem. Marriage of convenience anyone?

It’s easy to understand why China’s population has more men than women. Many years of the one-child-per-family law and an overwhelming preference for sons made abortion and infanticide of baby girls almost de rigueur.

It’s harder to grasp why Russia has more women than men. For a long time the reason was that World War II had wiped out the male population. Russia lost over 29,000,000 during that conflict, most of them men. These days, the reasons are less dramatic and probably have more to do with lifestyle choices than anything else.

Most Western men who spend any time in Russia quickly find out that they can have their pick of beautiful Russian girls. It’s assumed that this is because the Russians are aching to move away. But really it’s because men are such a rare commodity in Russia.

I recently did a radio interview the subject of which was “Are Russian men ugly?” and the point I made was that it doesn’t really matter if they are or not, because the pool of men is so limited that women will flock to them anyway.

This fact profoundly affects relationships in Russia. Men have a monopoly on power that they wield with impunity. From my own experience dating a Russian man, I found out for myself just how much.

That relationship gave me a lot of divergent “firsts”: first time a boyfriend painted my portrait vs. first time I was ever cheated on, first time I was ever serenaded vs. first time I was ever stood up, first time I was ever carried over an icy puddle vs. first time I was ever hit.

My experience is not rare. Russian women find that the scarcity of men affects relationships in all sorts of ways, both blatant and subtle.

Elena Krivovyaz, an editor in Moscow for the Daily Telegraph, says that Russian men have become more confident, and women more insecure. “When something or somebody is rare, then it’s of higher value,” she says. “This circumstance provides men in our society much freedom and power to dictate the rules, which are more convenient for them. I’ve noticed that being a man in our society is way more prestigious and even safe.”

Simply put, women in Russia must tolerate whatever men can dish out. For instance, domestic violence is not only rampant there, but accepted.

According to the Duma’s Committee on Social Defense, two-thirds of all murders in 2009 were of women who died in domestic disputes. Frederica Behr of Amnesty International in Moscow has reported that there are three times as many Russian women murdered at home as in any other European country, and that one woman dies by unnatural causes per hour in Russia compared with one per week in the U.K.

Marina Pisklakova-Parker, the founder of Russia’s first hotline and crisis center for women, was quoted in Newsweek saying that “the number of Russian women killed will keep increasing, as there is no law that would punish domestic crime. Both the state and society treat this issue as something everybody is used to. It is commonplace that men beat women in Russia. And it is commonplace in Russia, too, that women forgive their men for the beatings.”

Less dangerous, but equally demoralizing for women, is the rampant infidelity practiced by men in Russia. The Russian I was seeing was married at the time of our relationship. This fact seemed to neither surprise nor particularly bother any of the Russian parties involved. He recently told me that after our relationship ended, he picked up with someone else. “I am in another affair,” he wrote. “I am not an easy type.” You can almost hear the shrug.

In her book Lust in Translation: Which Country Has the Highest Rates of Infidelity?, Pamela Druckerman writes that “in Moscow, women in their forties told me that, by necessity, they only date married men. That’s because…the life expectancy for Russian men has fallen so sharply (to 59) that by age 65 there are just 46 men left for every 100 women.”

Tessa thinks this is true for younger women as well. As she told me, “More women in Russia nowadays are okay with being in a serious relationship with a married guy.”

Astonishingly, Druckerman goes on to remark that “it was clear that Russian men flaunted [their] demographic advantage. With the exception of a pastor (who was sitting with his wife at the time), I didn’t meet a single married man in Russia who admitted to being monogamous.”

Compare that to the United States, where statistics on adultery are notoriously unreliable due to the fact that people won’t admit to being unfaithful. According to what I could ascertain, about 60% of men in the US will have an affair, but only 22% will reveal that to a researcher and only a small percentage of them will also reveal it to their wives.

During my time in Moscow, I discovered that this culture of infidelity has a crushing impact on women’s relationships with each other as well. Imagine if all your friends considered your spouse or partner fair game for a serious relationship: what would that do to your interactions with them? That’s why there is a distinctive lack of a “gal pal” culture in Russia.

Reminiscent of a bygone era, the press in Russia is forbidden by law to write about President Vladimir Putin’s own dalliances, but that doesn’t prevent them from being commonly known. It’s pretty much accepted in Russia that Putin, who has been married since 1983, has had a long-term affair with Alina Kabaeva, a former Olympic gymnast, and even that he is the father of her child, born in 2009. Besides being good fun to talk about, no one in Russia really cares. Yet a brief incident with Monica Lewinsky almost cost Bill Clinton his job.

Despite the risk of death and/or heartbreak, women in Russia still believe that finding a man is of paramount importance. Ms. Krivovyaz told me that many women will enroll in math or engineering schools in the hope that they will find men there “Women are dependent on men, she says. “[Men] become a target to gain various goals in society and are a clear indicator of your social status as a woman.”

But the disproportionate amount of men in Russia is not all bad news. The men there are still very comfortable being men, in the old sense of the word. After all, there’s still my positive “firsts” to consider, each one an example of a certain chivalry difficult to come by anywhere else.

I think Tessa summed it up best when she told me “Russian men are more manly, less whiny than American men.”

Russia: where the men are men. And too many women are nervous wrecks.

 

[extramarital]

Men Who Are 'Husband Material' Are Getting Harder to Find, Study Says
Kimberly Dawn Neumann Kimberly Dawn Neumann
September 26, 2014 at 7:30 PM

Just talk to me or any of my adorable, successful, fun single female friends and we'll tell you that there is a man drought going on. Seriously, it's like the pool of men who are marriage material has evaporated faster than well, water in California.

But now, there is actually empirical evidence to back up this favorite girl's night topic of conversation.

According to newly released results from the latest Pew Research Center census analysis, there are only 91 eligible bachelors out there for every 100 single women. That means 9 of us are SOL (so out of luck) before we even get a date with one of those remaining in this endangered species. There really is a shortage of men who are husband material!

Of course, this statistic comes from the admission that most women (78%) in the never-married 25-34 age bracket covered in the report consider "eligible" to mean that he has a job...and the number of employed men is on the decline.

And heaven help you if you actually hope that your man might be tall or have hair!

Okay, so actually there isn't anything about height or lack of hair in the study, but you get the point. Basically this report is saying that women can't afford to be all that picky because they're in the minority.

Of course, that's assuming that you value him "having a job" as among your top criteria. Though this study showed that the number of men with gainful employment has steadily declined in recent years -- in 1960 there were 139 never-married men with jobs per 100 women -- the part of these stats we can't overlook is that there are now more women in the workplace. Personally, while having a man with a job would be nice, I can't say it would be my number one priority in finding a mate.

Actually, it's rather fascinating that women rated employment even higher on the list for mate-matching than having similar ideas about wanting kids and how to raise them (70%), sharing morals (38%), and being similarly educated (28%). Call me crazy, but I would rate shared morals much higher than a cushy bottom line, but maybe that's just me?

Also, get this...there are 77 never-married men ages 25-34 with post-graduate degrees for every 100 women with similar educational credentials. So if you're highly educated and want a guy who is smart as well as has a job, the odds are even less in your favor.

Even with these stats, I applaud women being choosy about their mates. It's okay to know what you want, and I don't think people should settle just because they're of "marrying age" -- unless they'd also like to end up a divorce statistic.

However, that may not be an issue either, since it seems that not only are people not settling...they're not getting married at all! In 2012, 1-in-5 adults ages 25 and older (that's about 42 million people) had never been married. In 1960, that number was only about 1-in-10 adults. And if things keep going at this rate, by the year 2030, a full 25% of those in the 45-54 age bracket at that time will never have been married.

So basically, this boils down to the following: Fewer men + fewer people getting married = it's a good thing my single gal pals and I have started talking about saving for a retirement home together on a beach somewhere warm!

What do you think? Is there a shortage of eligible men going on?