- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Messages
- 491
- Points
- 0
This after her brother was cleared for the cashback scam....
SINGAPORE - Of the nearly 200 farms in the Kranji area, hers was the only one prosecuted for failing to run safety checks on building premises, Bollywood Veggies owner Ivy Singh-Lim has claimed.
Did the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) "single out" Bollywood Veggies? Ms Singh-Lim asked this at the start of the trial yesterday.
The former Netball Singapore president, who could be fined up to $40,000 and jailed for up to a year for the offences if her farm is found culpable, also contended that the law requiring owners to conduct such safety checks was "never meant to apply to farms in Kranji".
Defence counsel Engelin Teh told the court that the safety inspections are required only five years after owners obtain temporary occupation permits or certificates of statutory completion.
But like "almost all" the other farms in Kranji, which have structures on their lands without either of these documents, the lawyer said, one of the buildings on Ms Singh-Lim's property was not issued these documents. This meant that the Commissioner of Building Control could not serve notices on them to comply, the Senior Counsel argued.
Disagreeing, BCA senior technician Baliah Pillai said all non-residential buildings are required to undergo inspections.
He added that Bollywood Veggies was first served a notice for inspection of its buildings on April 29, 2008 but it "persisted in not complying", despite three reminder letters.
Why, then, did the notice ask for all buildings on Bollywood Veggies to be inspected - even though one was a house where Ms Singh-Lim lived and another was the workers' quarters, Ms Teh asked.
Mr Pillai's reply: It was a standard letter.
Ms Teh also asked if Mr Pillai was trying to bully Ms Singh-Lim into compliance by "threatening" her with a fine and imprisonment in some of the reminder letters. He disagreed and repeated that this was standard practice.
The hearing continues today.