• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ass Loon Justifies Using PA as FAP's Political Tool. Sorry My Foot!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
<TBODY>[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: msgtxt"][h=1]PM Lee defends PAP involvement in PA[/h]Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said on Saturday that, as part of the government, the People's Association's (PA) grassroots organisations require "somebody who is working on behalf of the government".

He was defending the practice of appointing members of the ruling People's Action Party as advisers of the statutory board's some 1,800 grassroots organisations.

"It's like having a Ministry of Education. The civil servants are impartial, are neutral, but the minister is a government minister. Or the Minister for Health, or, for that matter, the CDC mayor -- he is a government person," he said.

"And so, the grassroots adviser has to be somebody who can work with the government and help the government to achieve its goals on the ground. I think that's necessary."

Lee, on the sidelines of a ceremony to appoint district councillors under the Central Singapore CDC, was responding to media queries about the recent spat between PA and Members of Parliament (MP) from the Workers' Party over use of public sites in Hougang single member constituency and Aljunied group representation constituency (GRC).

The matter sparked public debate as to whether the PAP government should appoint its candidates as PA grassroots adverse in all constituencies, even the ones that they lost in elections.

The PA has also sent two letters to the media, stating that "it is not possible" to appoint opposition MPs as advisers, because it cannot ask opposition MPs to help the government connect better with the people, or be able to help explain, implement and improve its policies.

"I cleared those letters so I think that is the position," said Lee.

The Prime Minister, who is also MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC, emphasised that PA's work is non-political. Grassroots advisers administer government programs such as ComCare as well as "some things which are not always nice", such as the carrying out of public works wherein residents will be affected.

"Then it falls to the grassroots to be the interface, to work with the people to try and help to minimise the impact but at the same time, ultimately, what has to be done has to be done," he said.

"So these are really government functions."

He added that the MP's role is a different one -- running the town council. The government would involve him on issues such as bursary payouts and town council rebates.

"So between the MP and the adviser, if they are different people, then residents will be properly served. I think it has to work like that," he said.
[/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]
 
hi there


1. sheep to change, my foot!
2. tau neh tan, so how huh?
3. i bet whitehair is speechless and ball-less to comment on such crap.
 
Every MP, no matter which party, sits in Parliament, and has equal rights to speak and vote for a bill. They are also paid by the country’s coffer too. Why are the opposition MPs seen as not part of the govt? Oh the majority party forms the govt so they are the govt, and the minority does not form the govt and thus not the govt nor part of the govt. They are just a part of Parliament which is not the govt of the country, which is part of the legislature, which has the power to make laws, but not the govt.The right question to ask is why are losing PAP MPs considered part of government when they have lost their mandate and authority to do so?

Why are the losing PAP MPs appointed advisors when the people have not chosen them and they have proved themselves to be incapable and unrepresentative of them?

This is clearly unconstitutional and undemocratic.

Very confusing arguments huh? The right question to ask is why are losing PAP MPs considered part of government when they have lost their mandate and authority to do so?

Why are the losing PAP MPs appointed advisors when the people have not chosen them and they have proved themselves to be incapable and unrepresentative of them?

This is clearly unconstitutional and undemocratic.

http://mysingaporenews.blogspot.com/2011/09/seriously-are-opposition-mps-part-of.html
 
He he, there are 87 equal parts in a circle but 6 of the parts in the circle does not form part of the circle. What kind of logic is that?
 
Back
Top