• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Apostle John Tan Leads Sinkies In Maintaining Cecapore's Ban On Anal Faggot Sex! 58,000 Sinkies Support!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
An online petition calling for Singapore’s ban on gay sex to be maintained has picked up nearly 58,000 signatures since it was started on Saturday (8 September) afternoon.

Titled “Please Keep Penal Code 377A in Singapore”, the petition was set up on the Change.org website by user “Paul P” and had gathered 57,939 signatures as of 2.20pm on Sunday. Section 377A of the nation’s Penal Code is a piece of British colonial-era legislation that criminalises sex acts between men.

A message on the petition site cited the recent decision by India’s Supreme Court to repeal a similar law and subsequent comments made by “prominent figures” to have the law challenged in Singapore as reasons to “reiterate our position to the Singapore government that we wants the Penal Code 377A to stay”.

“By repealing the section 377A penal code, it would begin to normalise homosexual behaviours as a societal norm and lead to greater push for other LGBT rights in our conservative society as we have seen played out in other western societies today,” said the message.

“We do not think the vocal minority should impose their values and practice on the silent majority who are still largely conservative.”

In comments left on the site, signees cited a variety of reasons for supporting the petition – ranging from wanting to “keep families and Singapore strong and harmonious” to preserving the nation’s societal and religious values.

4fed8d7e8ec502346c2425d0dd23c427


While the site did not name any parties, prominent Singaporean diplomat Tommy Koh had commented last Thursday the issue over Facebook and suggested that the country’s gay community “bring a class action to challenge the constitutionality of Section 377A”.

Law and Home Affairs K Shanmugam also weighed in on the matter and told the media last Friday that it is up to Singaporean society to decide on where it wants to go with Section 377A – noting that the government is “in the middle” on the issue.

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/thousands-back-petition-maintain-singapores-gay-sex-ban-071417138.html
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
As I said b4. Keeping it is useless when it is not enforced. It should be more for calling for the enforcement of the law
 

Kuailan

Alfrescian
Loyal
In-dear can approve Lesbian and Gay because they don't want Girls to be raped by Gay man, they don't mind man fuck man ass!!

Smelly cheebye rub smelly rotten cheebye~ Judge approved!!
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
I've been working closely with Apostle Lawrence Khong on fighting the faggots. We will not let the fags overrun Singapore any more than we would allow oppies to take over.
 

AhMeng

Alfrescian (Inf- Comp)
Asset
I've been working closely with Apostle Lawrence Khong on fighting the faggots. We will not let the fags overrun Singapore any more than we would allow oppies to take over.
Your quest will be futile, though I do support oppies, neutral about gays. It's destiny, you can't fight it. Lol :biggrin:
 

sam heng

Alfrescian
Loyal
I am always weary about any group with the word "rights" in it. Give them a inch they want a yard. What next? same sex marriage? Trans toilet? fluid sexes? See what happen to the crazy western world self destructing with all these globalist, leftists madness not to mention immigrants problem. Just say no!
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
An online petition calling for Singapore’s ban on gay sex to be maintained has picked up nearly 58,000 signatures since it was started on Saturday (8 September) afternoon.

Titled “Please Keep Penal Code 377A in Singapore”, the petition was set up on the Change.org website by user “Paul P” and had gathered 57,939 signatures as of 2.20pm on Sunday. Section 377A of the nation’s Penal Code is a piece of British colonial-era legislation that criminalises sex acts between men.

A message on the petition site cited the recent decision by India’s Supreme Court to repeal a similar law and subsequent comments made by “prominent figures” to have the law challenged in Singapore as reasons to “reiterate our position to the Singapore government that we wants the Penal Code 377A to stay”.

“By repealing the section 377A penal code, it would begin to normalise homosexual behaviours as a societal norm and lead to greater push for other LGBT rights in our conservative society as we have seen played out in other western societies today,” said the message.

“We do not think the vocal minority should impose their values and practice on the silent majority who are still largely conservative.”

In comments left on the site, signees cited a variety of reasons for supporting the petition – ranging from wanting to “keep families and Singapore strong and harmonious” to preserving the nation’s societal and religious values.

4fed8d7e8ec502346c2425d0dd23c427


While the site did not name any parties, prominent Singaporean diplomat Tommy Koh had commented last Thursday the issue over Facebook and suggested that the country’s gay community “bring a class action to challenge the constitutionality of Section 377A”.

Law and Home Affairs K Shanmugam also weighed in on the matter and told the media last Friday that it is up to Singaporean society to decide on where it wants to go with Section 377A – noting that the government is “in the middle” on the issue.

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/thousands-back-petition-maintain-singapores-gay-sex-ban-071417138.html

This group is sinkapore's Taliban?
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I am always weary about any group with the word "rights" in it. Give them a inch they want a yard. What next? same sex marriage? Trans toilet? fluid sexes? See what happen to the crazy western world self destructing with all these globalist, leftists madness not to mention immigrants problem. Just say no!

There is a place for you with the Taliban.
 

3_M

Alfrescian
Loyal
Meaningless of having the penal code when you don't enforce it. Law shouldn't be used as a symbolic tool to please everyone.

It either they actively enforce it (which is my preference) or remove it totally.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually from this article. The counter point would be.. Gay sex violates human dignity..so does being a transgender..
Skip Navigation
Jump to Main Main navigation and Meta Navigation
To Home
Meta Main Navigation
OpenAll SectionsAll SectionsClose
Court challenge filed on 377A arguing that gay sex law ‘violates human dignity’
Singapore
Court challenge filed on 377A arguing that gay sex law ‘violates human dignity’
image: 
Pink Dot1
The crowd at Hong Lim Park for a Pink Dot event. (Photo: Monica Kotwani)
By Lydia Lam
12 Sep 2018 03:47PM
(Updated: 12 Sep 2018 04:19PM)
Share this content




Bookmark

SINGAPORE: A man has filed a court challenge against Singapore's gay sex law, saying that it is inconsistent with parts of the Constitution.

Mr Johnson Ong Ming, a 43-year-old disc jockey and producer, filed the case on Monday (Sep 10). According to court papers, the case argues that Section 377A of the Penal Code is inconsistent with three articles in the Constitution concerning liberty of a person and equal protection.

Advertisement

Under 377A, any male person who commits or tries to get another male person to commit "any act of gross indecency with another male person", whether in public or private, can be jailed for up to two years.

The first of three articles in the Constitution that Mr Ong refers to says that "no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty save in accordance with law".

The other two articles state that "all persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law", and "there shall be no discrimination against citizens of Singapore on the ground only of religion, race, descent or place of birth in any law".

Mr Ong, who also owns a digital marketing agency, told Channel NewsAsia on Wednesday that he chose to mount the court challenge as LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) groups are "not allowed to organise" and "don't see ourselves represented positively on mainstream media, if at all".

Advertisement
"Without access to help and resources, navigating through life is a lonely and often stressful process for every LGBT Singaporean," he said.

"Most importantly, I am not a criminal and I do not want to go through life being branded as one by my own country. It takes a psychological toll on you going through life thinking you are less than everyone else."

READ: Singapore society has to decide which direction it wants to take on laws against gay sex, says Shanmugam

Mr Ong will be represented by lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam, who will contend that Section 377A is "accordingly void" as it is inconsistent with the Constitution.

In response to queries by Channel NewsAsia, Mr Thuraisingam’s law firm said it will argue that Section 377A “violates human dignity”.

As sexual orientation is “unchangeable or suppressible at unacceptable personal cost”, criminalising its manifestation is “absurd” and “arbitrary”, Mr Thuraisingam will contend.

He will provide expert evidence to prove his points, and note that “an unusually large number of legal developments in various jurisdictions have occurred in a short span of time” since 2014, when the last legal challenge against 377A was mounted in Singapore.

READ: Singapore diplomat Tommy Koh calls for gay community to challenge sex ban

Mr Ong's court challenge comes a few days after India ruled to decriminalise consensual gay sex in the country, a move that sparked discussion in the local community on repealing Section 377A.

Veteran Singapore diplomat Tommy Koh called for Singapore's gay community to challenge 377A last week.

The ambassador-at-large at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs made the comments in response to a Facebook post on India's landmark ruling.

Legal challenges against the law, in 2014, had failed, but Professor Koh said: "Try again."

Chief of Government Communications Janadas Devan also wrote on his Facebook page that he personally supports Prof Koh's position.

Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam had said it is up to Singapore's society to decide which direction it wants to take on gay sex legislation.

Mr Ong, who has been in a relationship for more than a year, said he was energised by India's ruling and Prof Koh's statement.

He added that a successful court challenge would be "a monumental moment for not just the LGBTQ community but for all Singaporeans because gay rights, like women’s rights, like any subjugated minority rights, are human rights".

A pre-trial conference for Mr Ong's case will be heard on Sep 25.
Source: CNA/ll(cy)
Tagged Topics
court

377A

Penal Code
Share this content




Bookmark

More stories for you
Decision on Section 377A ‘a matter for Parliament’: Shanmugam Toggle share menu
Gay sex ruling to free India's 'pink economy' Toggle share menu
Singapore society has to decide which direction it wants to take on laws against gay sex: Shanmugam Toggle share menu
image: https://images.outbrainimg.com/tran...AsImgiOjIwMCwiZCI6MS41LCJjcyI6MCwiZiI6MH0.jpg
Over 830 patients received medicine with wrong labels after glitch in health ministry's IT system | Video
Over 830 patients received medicine with wrong labels after glitch in health ministry's IT system | Video
image: https://images.outbrainimg.com/tran...AsImgiOjIwMCwiZCI6MS41LCJjcyI6MCwiZiI6MH0.jpg
You Wouldn't Believe How Cheap Dental Implants Are In Perth
You Wouldn't Believe How Cheap Dental Implants Are In Perth
Dental Implants | Sponsored Listings
Recommended by

Get the Channel NewsAsia newsletter in your inbox


Enter your email address
SUBSCRIBE
Advertisement
More information about Channel News Asia
jump to top of page
Sections
Singapore
Asia
World
CNA Insider
Business
Sport
Lifestyle
Technology
Health
Commentary
Podcasts
Video on Demand
ASEAN
About Us
About Channel NewsAsia
Hotel Partners
Events & Seminars
Presenters & Correspondents
Contact Us
Advertise with us
Contact Sales
Online Advertising
TV Advertising
Get the news that matters in your inbox every morning!
Please enter your email address
Enter your email address

I consent to the use of my personal data by Mediacorp and the Mediacorp group of companies (collectively "Mediacorp") to send me marketing and advertising materials in relation to goods and services of Mediacorp and its business partners and for research and analysis
SUBSCRIBE
Follow our news
Experience news with our apps
Play Store
App Store
Copyright© Mediacorp 2018. Mediacorp Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.

Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
image:
image: https://rp.gwallet.com/r1/cm/p46


Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...w-dj-files-court-challenge-singapore-10708288
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually arguing about legalizing gay sex is a moot point.

Just because it is illegal doesn't stop gays from having sex at their own discretion.
 
Top