.....
Low hits out at PAP 'missteps' in final WP rally
http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big...hits-out-pap-missteps-final-wp-rally-20130124
In fact, Low Tidak Khiang actually has already rebutted himself just a few days ago:
http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big...y/wp-will-keep-close-watch-over-govt-20130119
WP 'will keep close watch over Govt'
According to Low Tak Khiang, shouldn’t PAP be given time to rectify their shortcoming and finding back their way? “Doing so would serve the public interest better than continuing to agitate and raise political tension to gain maximum political mileage for WP as it takes time for policy changes to take effect on the ground?”
Or is it that PAP’s so many missteps were the inevitable results of Vichy WP for giving them so much time to rectify their shortcomings? Does Vichy WP’s fear, reluctance and impotence to challenge the PAP in parliament the very reason for their utter failure in “agitating and raising” the political awareness and awakening of the people? Does Vichy WP’ total silence in parliament allows the PAP regime “to gain maximum political mileage” for all their unpopular policies? Does Low Tak Khiang “serve the public interest better” by continuing to allow the PAP regime to take their own sweet time “for policy changes to take effect on the ground”?
Again, Comical Ah-Khiang has pah Comical Ah-Khiang with his very own words from his very own mouth…
....
Low hits out at PAP 'missteps' in final WP rally
http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big...hits-out-pap-missteps-final-wp-rally-20130124
The Workers' Party saved its fiercest attack for its final rally last night, with party chief Low Thia Khiang accusing the ruling People's Action Party of losing its way.
In fact, Low Tidak Khiang actually has already rebutted himself just a few days ago:
http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big...y/wp-will-keep-close-watch-over-govt-20130119
WP 'will keep close watch over Govt'
…it is also my personal belief that the Government should be given time to rectify the shortcomings…..
Doing so would serve the public interest better than continuing to agitate and raise political tension to gain maximum political mileage for WP as it takes time for policy changes to take effect on the ground.
According to Low Tak Khiang, shouldn’t PAP be given time to rectify their shortcoming and finding back their way? “Doing so would serve the public interest better than continuing to agitate and raise political tension to gain maximum political mileage for WP as it takes time for policy changes to take effect on the ground?”
Or is it that PAP’s so many missteps were the inevitable results of Vichy WP for giving them so much time to rectify their shortcomings? Does Vichy WP’s fear, reluctance and impotence to challenge the PAP in parliament the very reason for their utter failure in “agitating and raising” the political awareness and awakening of the people? Does Vichy WP’ total silence in parliament allows the PAP regime “to gain maximum political mileage” for all their unpopular policies? Does Low Tak Khiang “serve the public interest better” by continuing to allow the PAP regime to take their own sweet time “for policy changes to take effect on the ground”?
Again, Comical Ah-Khiang has pah Comical Ah-Khiang with his very own words from his very own mouth…
....