Facebook representative shouldn't waste their time on this wayang shit created by PAP. The new law has been crafted on stone already, no need to argue until turn pale. Go for a good steak and wine and sit back relax and watch how parliament of White Shits shout "AYE" to the new law.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
ANG MOH vs LAW MINISTAR GO 1 ON 1 NO GLOVES. FIGHT TILL THE END...MUST WATCH MUST WATCH
- Thread starter ahleebabasingaporethief
- Start date
You said it, bro.
Perhaps WP can watch this video and learn a few tricks from the AMDK.
Ah Neh has this habit of changing a word or two in your statement while pretending to quote you. The words tend to change the context of the meaning of what you said, and if you are not careful, and proceed to answer his question without correcting those words, then your original statement (and the meaning therein) will be lost in a series of exchanges.
AMDK was very sharp, always correcting those words that he did not use before answering his questions.
boss, since we are on this internet topic, how cock sure are you that your server will not get hacked and IP addresses harvested?
No use. WP is a chink party. And educated chinks are bookworm types. No match in wits against even a second rate Ang Moh. Such thing cannot knowledge transfer. It’s in you, or not.
Not true, the Ang Mo is very tua kee, which is why Sham dare not use much force on him unlike our minority opposition party. If Singaporeans have enough guts to vote in more oppposition, LHL will literally pee in his pants and carry out of parliament to clean up.No use. WP is a chink party. And educated chinks are bookworm types. No match in wits against even a second rate Ang Moh. Such thing cannot knowledge transfer. It’s in you, or not.
it really sounded more like an interrogation.. as if fb would really be bothered by the pappies.
On the other hand, I wonder how will the bui bui kirsten and hhh be grilled...
On the other hand, I wonder how will the bui bui kirsten and hhh be grilled...
It is absolutely clear for all to see and it has been so for a while now, that the "mighty" pap is only a frog in a well. This thing about "punching above our weight" only exists in their deluded minds.
Why on earth would anyone want to harvest IP addresses? They are of no value to whatsoever. In fact the IP range of all the SG ISPs is public knowledge. It's available on numerous websites.
Now why on earth did I use harvest when I meant stolen? But good to know IP addresses are not logged. You have made that quite clear.
70% of Singaporeans might be blind and deaf but let the whole world see and listen to this so called feedback session and they can decide.
Wait...this might be considered as fake news!
WAS DAT HOW HE BECAME SC???????????? sad
At 8:40 min,
FB:"There is no policy that everything posted has to be true, verified and accurate. "
Shanmugam : "... and therefore even if it is false, you will not take it down"
This statement by Shanmugam is dumb!
I just click on the video (not really interested). Just these short exchanges show our law minister is not as smart and clever as a lawyer and minister should be. Facebook would have to cease operation it were legally obligated to ensure and verify truth; how do you monitor every post made on Facebook? It is just a nonsensical allegation that Facebook will not act "even if it is false". Even if Obama himself openly stated he is not a Muslim, we could even assume he was lying for the sake of his political career. So reporting that Obama is actually a Muslim cannot be said to be fake news. Who in the world knows when a person is lying or when he is not lying. Of course, it is a serious allegation that Hilary Clinton runs a pedophile ring. But how can Facebook be expected to know it is not a fact. It is the people who should be smart to know what to trust and what not to trust.
It is OK to have legislation on fake news when the manner of determination of truth is a simple matter of fact. It is fake news if, in a particular speech, Obama said he is not a Muslim but it is reported that "Obama himself said at the speech he is a Muslim" - there is no controversy here at all about a fact.
OK. The whole world says Einstein is one of the greatest genius ever. His theory of relativity is taught in all top universities in the world including the Chinese universities like Tsinghua, Peking and Fudan. Many thousands of articles on relativity theory have been published in top peer review physics journal in the world. So, is it a "fact" that "Einstein is a genius"? Is it a "fact" that Einstein's relativity theory is one of the best tested and verified theory? I beg to differ. My homepage has seven of my papers that explain why Einstein's relativity, including his famous equation E=mc², to be wrong.
So what is fact and none-fact in many things is a matter of personal judgment and opinion.
Chan Rasjid,
http://www.emc2fails.com
FB:"There is no policy that everything posted has to be true, verified and accurate. "
Shanmugam : "... and therefore even if it is false, you will not take it down"
This statement by Shanmugam is dumb!
I just click on the video (not really interested). Just these short exchanges show our law minister is not as smart and clever as a lawyer and minister should be. Facebook would have to cease operation it were legally obligated to ensure and verify truth; how do you monitor every post made on Facebook? It is just a nonsensical allegation that Facebook will not act "even if it is false". Even if Obama himself openly stated he is not a Muslim, we could even assume he was lying for the sake of his political career. So reporting that Obama is actually a Muslim cannot be said to be fake news. Who in the world knows when a person is lying or when he is not lying. Of course, it is a serious allegation that Hilary Clinton runs a pedophile ring. But how can Facebook be expected to know it is not a fact. It is the people who should be smart to know what to trust and what not to trust.
It is OK to have legislation on fake news when the manner of determination of truth is a simple matter of fact. It is fake news if, in a particular speech, Obama said he is not a Muslim but it is reported that "Obama himself said at the speech he is a Muslim" - there is no controversy here at all about a fact.
OK. The whole world says Einstein is one of the greatest genius ever. His theory of relativity is taught in all top universities in the world including the Chinese universities like Tsinghua, Peking and Fudan. Many thousands of articles on relativity theory have been published in top peer review physics journal in the world. So, is it a "fact" that "Einstein is a genius"? Is it a "fact" that Einstein's relativity theory is one of the best tested and verified theory? I beg to differ. My homepage has seven of my papers that explain why Einstein's relativity, including his famous equation E=mc², to be wrong.
So what is fact and none-fact in many things is a matter of personal judgment and opinion.
Chan Rasjid,
http://www.emc2fails.com
Shanmugam (8:35): "...And the reverse of that is even if it is untrue, and even if it is false, therefore you will not take it down. The logical conclusions of those two statement is that because something is false (pause)... doesn't mean you will take it down."
Shanmugam has exposed himself to be not clear (at all times) in his thinking. He uses the "therefore" meaninglessly. "therefore" introduces a reason for an action(verb). So he was just muddled in his thinking in the above statement. His assertion above interprets to :"Facebook will not take down a statement because the statement was found to be false"! What an assertion!
... the "...reverse of that" would be: "Facebook will take down a statement because the statement is true"!
Shanmugam has exposed himself to be not clear (at all times) in his thinking. He uses the "therefore" meaninglessly. "therefore" introduces a reason for an action(verb). So he was just muddled in his thinking in the above statement. His assertion above interprets to :"Facebook will not take down a statement because the statement was found to be false"! What an assertion!
... the "...reverse of that" would be: "Facebook will take down a statement because the statement is true"!
The Select committee is supposed to invite and receive public feedback and therefore the approach should be cordial consultative and non-confrontational. However as one can see by now it is yet another PAP staged wayang. Charles Chong is a speechless ceremonial wooden-head chairman as Shan is the one who does all the interrogation or rather cross examination. He thinks he is a judge sitting high up looking down on the minions who are supposed to give him the answers he wants to hear. He basically sounded like a bully and it was just poetic justice that he was bested by a non lawyer.
Wat about presenting evidence of pap being the purveyors of fake news? For example the Marxist conspiracy? Or Swiss Standard of living? Or Operation Cold Store? Or Old Fart rising from the grave?
We dare him to invite previous detainees of the Operation Cold Store to debate about PAP having been feeding the populace fake news.
Similar threads
