• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Ang Moh Trump bite the NK Bait well, SCS war moving toKorean Peninsula

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
2,741
Points
38
Like I posted here before. South China Sea is not a good war theater for Beijing-Moscow Alliance, and Korean Peninsula is Ideal. Well within strategic advantage ranges for Russia & Chinese to bury huge amount of American Corpses.



http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2017-04-13/doc-ifyeimqy0971511.shtml


俄媒:若朝鲜半岛开战 中俄极有可能第二次抗美援朝


2017年04月13日 07:29 环球时报
//d1.sina.com.cn/201604/01/1414092.JPG
//d1.sina.com.cn/201604/01/1414092.JPG
新浪扶翼 行业专区

  原标题:俄媒:若半岛爆发全面战争 中俄不会坐视不管
资料图:朝鲜军队演习资料图:朝鲜军队演习

  [环球时报综合报道]北京时间12日,日本消息人士透露,海上自卫队计划派出数艘驱逐舰,与“卡尔·文森”号在东海进行联合演习,以显示力量。一名日本高官称,美国打算施加最大压力,迫使朝鲜通过和平和外交手段解决危机。《今日美国报》12日称,目前的局势非常具有戏剧性:美国航母正开赴朝鲜半岛,而朝鲜威胁一旦遭到攻击将核打击美国本土。不过,美国朝鲜问题专家洛佩兹认为,对朝全面制裁的目标是让平壤回到谈判桌。而美国外交关系协会高级研究员施耐德担心,是否有足够的时间制定全面制裁措施,阻止朝鲜导弹到达美国本土,“时间并非在美国这一边。这样,美国的选择往往是极端的,除了谈判,就是斩首或者动武”。

  韩国国内担忧战争的议论一片,“美国明确表示不会不同我们商量就采取新的政策或措施,”韩国外交部发言人赵俊赫周二被记者问及相关传言时说。

  《纽约时报》12日评论称,美韩联手,无论怎样都会打赢朝鲜,但人们担心韩国会遭到灾难性破坏。韩国前总统金泳三曾称,1994年朝鲜首次核危机爆发后不久,时任美国总统克林顿曾考虑对朝鲜宁边核设施发动袭击。一时间恐慌席卷韩国,民众纷纷囤积食品。最终克林顿放弃了袭击宁边的计划。

  《日本经济新闻》12日称,日本政府要求美国在对朝鲜采取军事行动时事先与日本进行协商,美国对此表示接受。但韩国外交部官员12日对韩联社表示,从目前掌握情况来看,很难说日本媒体所谓“美国通知日本政府有可能打朝鲜”的说法有何根据。

  这两天,有关半岛局势的缓和信号和冲突信号常常交错出现。《华尔街日报》12日称,特朗普已签署了应对朝鲜的政策,涉及进一步施加经济和政治压力,同时各种军事选项在较长期仍在考虑范围之内。而美国防长马蒂斯周二在五角大楼召开记者会时被问到美军派遣“卡尔·文森”号航母是否针对朝鲜时称,这艘航母“经常在那一海域航行,这次再前往那里并非有什么特别的作战要求”。

  韩国《东亚日报》12日的社论称,韩国必须准备好开战准备。当美国总统特朗普的冲动性决策遇上朝鲜最高领导人金正恩鲁莽的冒险主义时,出现军事冲突的可能性进一步加剧。同天的韩国《世界日报》则说,美国过去威胁对朝动武最终都没有落到行动上。当前特朗普虽摆出要武力教训朝鲜的架势,但若没有韩国同意,美国很难真正对朝动武。

  驻韩美军司令兼韩美联合司令部司令布鲁克斯12日表示,“考虑到朝鲜半岛安全状况”,他已经取消出席美国国会众议院军事委员会听证会的日程。韩联社称,这是由于最近可能出现朝鲜进行第六轮核试验等严峻形势,为防止出现指挥塔缺位的情况而做出的决定。

  俄罗斯《观点报》12日称,如果朝鲜半岛爆发全面战争,中俄不会对在自己边境地区发生战争坐视不管,会将美对朝的进攻视为对自己的直接威胁,“极有可能发起第二次抗美援朝”。“因此,特朗普不会冒发动世界大战的风险。”

  [环球时报赴朝鲜特派记者 王天迷 环球时报驻朝鲜特派记者 莽九晨 环球时报记者 白云怡 任重 王伟 柳玉鹏]

Vodka & Maotai on stand by!
 
Angmoh monkeys fighting at other countries soil.

Grow opium in India, but not in UK or Europe, and target at China door step. Keep their own land free from war WMD.

Now want to fight in North Asia again?

Come. The Chinese is waiting for this evil white monkies to stir shit.

The Yellow Peril will go to all British Empire occupied soils and make British Empire poor again that they were in 1700s.

This lazy white British Empire has nothing to sell and their WMD are far inferior quality than others.

The African States hate them. India hate them. Chinese hate them. Vietnam hate them. Philippine hate them. Pommies went round rhe world to pillage lòoting occupied lands for resources without share of commonwealth with the natives.

And this evil monkey still think they hv dominance over other races.
 
Last edited:
Like I posted here before. South China Sea is not a good war theater for Beijing-Moscow Alliance, and Korean Peninsula is Ideal. Well within strategic advantage ranges for Russia & Chinese to bury huge amount of American Corpses.



http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2017-04-13/doc-ifyeimqy0971511.shtml


俄媒:若朝鲜半岛开战 中俄极有可能第二次抗美援朝


2017年04月13日 07:29 环球时报



环球时报= CCP party news. Quoting Russian sources for this indication, basically, consensus reached, and in line with original general mutual interest to jointly fight USA, when war is within the Korean Peninsula.

The entire mechanism and identical parties and rules with the Previous Korean Wars, during 1950~1953. Part II and conclusion part from the previously unfinished episode.
 
SCS is the wrong place because it is far and vast, and fighting there will not destroy US foundations within Korea & Japan which are prime focus for Moscow & Beijing. However it will most likely destroy SG52 as the southern US base for SCS.

Missiles from Asian Continent to SCS are expensive long range missiles which are limited stock. Fights from continental airbases waste time and fuel and when reached SCS will not sustain very long fighting time.

Unless China already had liberated Taiwan, which would give an effective interception of US & Japanese ships and war planes coming towards SCS, otherwise, even Russians suffers the long painful route to come to SCS for fight.

SCS eventually worked to Chinese sovereignty only, not so interesting for Putin. Only Korean Peninsula will interest Putin directly, as he have direct territorial dispute with Japs.

NK is excellent bait, Ang Moh Turmp will bite. Once he is in, Russian & Chinese can at least take one US by their limbs, lose their foot-hold, from west coast of Pacific, and officially give up superpower title.
 
Before the war starts, embassy will start to evacuate their citizens and impose travel restrictions. I see none of these happening now. Hence US actions in Korean is nothing more than political posturing to intimidate NK.

Chances are there will be no millitary action.
 
NO need before, my pal fatty kim has been practising for the past 3 decades, donald duck is gg to send his navy to their deathbed in sea of japan.

the korean submarines will take down the entire fleet in middle of night n the last F14 will flee to taiwan, cowboy become cowdung.


dead men tell no tales

 
Before the war starts, embassy will start to evacuate their citizens and impose travel restrictions. I see none of these happening now. Hence US actions in Korean is nothing more than political posturing to intimidate NK.

Chances are there will be no millitary action.



Unlike Ang Mohs, in Asia there should not be so much care for preventing losses to civilians. Wasting civilians is good effects of wars.
 
Back
Top