• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ang Mo FT gleefully gloats at TRE

aurvandil

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
3,017
Points
48
I know many in here are not fans of TRE. On thing which TRE and its predecessor sites very well was to give a voice to the huge unhappiness many Singaporeans feel toward the PAP's FT policies. As a result of this, you can see the sense of pure joy FT's have over the latest developments involving TRE.

http://www.aussiepete.com/2012/02/stupidity-taxi-or-police-and-my-two.html

I always love a good 'stupidity' story... and this guy from Florida takes the cake.

But before I share with you the antics of this either very drunk or very stupid Florida man, I want to step up on to my more serious soap box for a moment and offer my two cents worth on the whole Temasek Review Emeritus legal letter and apology saga that's been making headlines here in Singapore this week.

For those readers outside of Singapore, you probably have no inkling as to what this is all about, so in short, a local website known as Temasek Review Emeritus (TRE) has had to remove an article from their site and publish an apology to Singapore's Prime Minister, Lee Hsien Loong for making false allegations about Madam Ho Ching's appointment as head of Temasek Holdings. Madam Ho Ching is the PM's wife... the apology comes after Mr Richard Wan (pictured), was served with a lawyer's letter requesting this course of action, due to the post that alleged cronyism in Madam Ho Ching's appointment.

So why do I care so much? Well, actually I don't... you see, over time, I've learned to ignore the inuendo, rumour-mongering and hurtful half-truths that Richard Wan (aka KojakBT) spews forth under the guise of 'for the people'. All I can say, is that it's a crying shame that such a 'softly, softly' approach was taken against Mr Wan. I would have much rather have seen him sued.

I was the subject of one of his personal attacks on the TRE website not too long ago, and the article in itself did not cause me too much concern, given that anybody that knows me and knows what I stand for, could clearly see through the (out of context) quotes and dubious conclusions he drew based on his narrow scope of research into my life. The article (as is common practice for the site) seemed to me to be clear bait to draw anti-foreigner sentiment among the TRE readers.

What did hurt me, however, was the way in which the article then 'propogated' itself across many forums, quoting KojakBT as the article author. The forummers were even more harsh than Mr Wan - based completely on the inuendo - and carried different and very concerning titles which accused me of all manner of things. The comments that this led to were so personal in nature (even up to, and including very nasty attacks on my wife and family), that I was compelled to write this article - WE LOVE SINGAPORE... FOR THE RECORD

The outpouring of support on email, facebook and twitter from locals and foreigners alike, quickly restored my faith in human nature and allowed me to almost forget the incident. That is, until I saw Mr Richard Wan in the news regarding the apology saga, which has made me think again about his sometimes almost libellous style of penman-ship.

Now that I've had my say, it's time to once again forget KojakBT and his style of article writing that has the potential to be very damaging to this beautiful country of Singapore - my home!

Back to the stupidity post - oh wait, did we ever digress? :)
 
good. don't know who is worse. pete the ang moh. richard wan the now docile man once identity outed like gay coming out of closet. wait, there is the third choice. the ones who wanted to intimidate richard wan with a lawyer letter.
 
The detractors of TRE are delirious over its recent setbacks.
 
Now that I've had my say, it's time to once again forget KojakBT and his style of article writing that has the potential to be very damaging to this beautiful country of Singapore - my home!

Hey, Aussie Pete do you know the meaning of LAN CHEOW? Don't just say Singapore is your home. Covert to a Singapore citizen first before you open your big LC mouth. Otherwise, you just kong jiao wey and shouldn't mess around with Singapore politics.
 
The detractors of TRE are delirious over its recent setbacks.
Do they include the WP people that so recently were still promoting the idea that TRE is pappy-run because of its sexpose of YSL? Wonder if these same people are the ones who continue to post the defamatory comments on TRE in the hope of getting Richard into trouble....;)
 
Back
Top