• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Analysis of some questionable points in Budget 2014, for further analysis

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
Analysis of some questionable points in Budget 2014
February 22nd, 2014

I refer to the Budget statement that has just been delivered in Parliament.

CPF contribution rate increase by 1.5% for aged above 50 to 55?

“We will raise CPF contribution rates for those aged above 50 to 55 by 1.5 percentage points – 1 percentage point from the employer and 0.5 percentage points from the employee.”

Take-home pay to decrease by 0.5%?

- This means that the take-home pay of this group of workers will be reduced by 0.5%.

With the statistics indicating widespread age discrimination in that as workers age, their real pay increase decreases, particularly for lower-income workers – this may contribute further to their financial stress.

“We will also raise the employer contribution rate for those aged above 55 to 65 by 0.5 percentage points.”

Medisave contribution rate increase by 1% for all workers?

Medisave contribution rate will increase by 1% for all workers, to be borne by the employer.

The above CPF contribution rate increases may add further wage pressures to employers and may translate into lower real wage increase.

Govt still need not spend a single cent on healthcare?

With the 1% increase in the Medisave contribution rate, the Government may continue to, from a cashflow perspective – not need to spend a single cent on healthcare, as the total annual Medisave contributions and interest credited on the the Medisave accounts’ balance of $60 billion (FY2012), is estimated to be about $10 billion.

0.52 ratio of annual CPF withdrawals to contributions?

The total CPF contributions to all accounts (Ordinary, Special and Medisave) was $28.6 billion in 2013 against total withdrawals of $14.9 billion.

Combined annual healthcare cash outflows still less than inflows?

Against this the combined total of Government operating and development expenditure ($5.2 billion), Medisave Scheme ($798.5 million), Private Medical Scheme ($484.1 million); Medifund payouts ($102 million) and the just announced annual increase in Government healthcare spending on the ”Pioneer Generation Package” subsidies for MediShield Life, expanded subsidies at Specialist Outpatient Clinics (SOCs), additional bills at polyclinics, Community Health Assist Scheme (CHAS) benefits, Disability Assistance and Medisave top-ups of $200 to $800; Medisave top-ups of $100 to $200 annually to those not eligible for the Pioneer Generation, etc

- may all still add up to less than the estimated $10 billion annual Medisave inflow.

What happens if pioneer generation still can’t pay?

The question is even with the enhanced subsidies (more for the older ones) for MediShield Life, SOC, etc for the pioneer generation - what happens if one is still unable to pay? Apply under Medifund Silver like what is currently happening, and have the entire family being subjected to vigorous means testing?

$1.16 Budget deficit or $6.84b Budget surplus?

Singapore is expected to have an overall surplus of S$3.9 billion, or 1.1% of GDP, for FY2013.

“Overall Budget balance is a deficit of $1.2 billion for FY2014, or about 0.3% of GDP” with a $8 billion one-time transfer to the newly created Pioneer Fund.

Does this mean that if not for this new transfer, the overall Budget balance in FY2014 is actually projected to be a whopping $6.84 billion? Yet another year of “under-reporting” of the Budget surplus through transfers to endowment funds being treated as an expenditure item?

Median wages increased 9% last 5 years?

“Median wages for citizens increased by about 9% in real terms in the last 5 years”

- As this is I believe based on wages including employer CPF contribution for full-time workers – what are the statistics for full-time and all workers (full-time and part-time) excluding employer CPF contribution?

After spending billions on PIC?

“The Productivity and Innovation Credit (PIC) scheme is due to expire in Year of Assessment (YA) 2015. There have been many calls for its extension. We have decided to extend the PIC scheme for another three years until YA2018. This extension will cost the Government a total of $3.6 billion.

While productivity has increased by 11% since we began the restructuring journey four years ago.”

- According to the Department of Statistics (DOS) Yearbook of Statistics 2013 – labour productivity grew by (0 (zero growth), -2.6, 1.3, 11.1 and -3.4 for 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 respectively. So, how did we get “productivity has increased by 11% since we began the restructuring journey four years ago”? Isn’t it 9.8 and 6.4 for the last 4 and 5 years, respectively?

Also, since PIC was introduced in Budget 2010, productivity growth following its introduction was a miserable 1.3, -2.6 and 0, in 2011, 2012 and 2013 respectively!

65% of companies losing money?

In this connection, according to former NTUC Income CEO, Mr Tan Kin Lian who spoke at the Pre-Budget 2014 Public Forum on 15 February – “In year of assessment 2011, a total of 57,000 companies reported a total profit of $90.4 billion, while 106,000 companies reported a total loss of $63.8 billion.

The number of loss making companies increased from 104,000 in 2003 to 165,000 in 2011. The average loss per company increased from $210,000 to $600,000″.

Workfare really helps a lot?

With regard to “Second, we are mitigating wage disparities, by using tax revenues to top up the wages in the lowest 20% through Workfare.”

- Workfare only helps lower-income workers age 35 and above. Moreover, the bulk of it goes to CPF and is not paid in cash. For example, when I used the Workfare calculator for a 61 year old worker earning $1,800 – what I got was only $177 in cash for the whole year of 2013, and $261 to CPF.

Leong Sze Hian

Leong Sze Hian is the Past President of the Society of Financial Service Professionals, an alumnus of Harvard University, Wharton Fellow, SEACeM Fellow and an author of 4 books. He is frequently quoted in the media. He has also been invited to speak more than 100 times in 25 countries on 5 continents. He has served as Honorary Consul of Jamaica, Chairman of the Institute of Administrative Management, and founding advisor to the Financial Planning Associations of Brunei and Indonesia. He has 3 Masters, 2 Bachelors degrees and 13 professional qualifications. He blogs at www.leongszehian.com.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Nobody should work beyond 50 in the first place so it's a moot point.
 

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
The adjustments r peanuts compared to the rising cost of living index. Inflation will easily outpace any contribution the budget provides and we will be where we started or worse. The gahment needs to shut the FT floodgate further to reduce demand and bring prices down. This will also make Singapore less alien to Singaporeans!!
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I have mentally tuned out anything that's related to CPF. Even if you have announced a 100% increase in CPF contribution rate I just shrug my shoulders and move on with my life.

If you want to impress me, give me cash. Non-liquid, locked up 'fake money' is irrelevant to me. I regard the CPF as hidden taxation that eats into my disposable income.

Furthermore, a sum of money that's locked up for so long should be yielding much more returns - it's called the time value of money. Unfortunately, too many daft and undiscerning Sinkie dogs salivate whenever the govt throws them crumbs under the pretext of generosity. :rolleyes:
 

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually the gahment already indirectly admitted the CPF scheme is a failure. It has failed in its original objective as a retirement fund. Just wish the Opp will attack more on this. The more they tinker with it, the more convoluted it becomes and in future it will become a monstrous mess!!
 
Top