• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Americans Killed by Syrian Fire Directly - perfectly legal on Syrian Soil. More corpse pse! MAGA!

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.sohu.com/a/237142608_626685



武器先生
1617文章 1.3亿总阅读
查看TA的文章>


2246

  • 分享到


叙政府军首次向美军地面部队开火,十多人阵亡

2018-06-22 09:32 叙利亚 /美国 /美军

bcd4840a845c408eaac5d4f77c878316.jpeg


美国领导的国际联军自2014年8月在未经叙利亚政府允许下,以开展名为“坚定决心”的国际反恐军事行动擅自进入叙利亚。这四年来,美国联军在叙利亚狂轰乱炸。而且炸完你,再跟你说这是完全合法的!

叙利亚政府军对此是敢言也敢怒,就是不敢动手。甚至无奈之下去求联合国安理会谴责美国联军的侵略行为,但毛作用都没有。

然而,兔子急了也会咬人。6月22日,叙利亚政府军野战指挥官向卫星通讯社表示,叙政府军与美军首次发生地面冲突。

33421dbd9c904efcaf32d9b9517f0475.jpeg


叙野战军指挥官称,“美军3装甲运兵车沿着公路向叙利亚东部霍姆斯省的叙军阵地逼近,驻守在当地的叙利亚政府军对美军开火,美军在遭到攻击之后迅速掉头撤离,其伤亡情况并未公开。随后,美军出动了多架战机对当地叙政府军阵地进行了空袭报复,造成1名叙军人丧生。”

但是,叙反对派武装的消息源则表示,至少有十多名叙利亚政府军在突袭中被炸死。而且,美军还在计划发动更大规模的报复行动。

对此,美国五角大楼表示,对美军的任何蓄意攻击都是不可接受的挑衅,美军将采取措施对这种行为进行打击。

92c79c77362d44cbacba866a31c8d748.jpeg


俄罗斯军事专家萨姆索诺夫指出,美军和叙利亚政府军这几年来虽然互相敌对,但是双方的冲突都集中在代理人战争,比如说亲美反对派武装和叙利亚政府军交火,或者是美军战机对叙利亚军队空袭,并没有这种面对面的地面冲突,此次美叙报复地面交火,如果处理不慎的话将导致整个叙利亚的局势彻底失控,很可能将把美军和俄军都卷入正面的冲突中。

我们多少也要为叙利亚士兵的勇气点赞,加油!多消灭一些侵略者!返回搜狐,查看更多

声明:该文观点仅代表作者本人,搜狐号系信息发布平台,搜狐仅提供信息存储空间服务。


Mr. Weapons

1617 articles
1.3 billion total reading

View TA's Articles>

2246

share to

Syrian government forces opened fire on US ground troops for the first time and more than a dozen people were killed
2018-06-22 09:32
Syria
/
United States
/
US military

The U.S.-led international coalition entered Syria without permission from the Syrian government in August 2014, launching an international anti-terrorist military campaign called "Resolutely Determined." In the past four years, the U.S. coalition has been bombarded in Syria. And after you've bombed you, it's perfectly legal to tell you!

The Syrian government forces dare not to speak out and dare to fury. Even desperation went to the UN Security Council to condemn the aggression of the U.S. coalition forces, but Mao had no effect.

However, rabbits will bite people anxiously. On June 22, the Syrian government field field commander told the Satellite News Agency that the Syrian government forces had the first ground conflict with the US military.

The commander of the Syrian Field Army said: "The U.S. 3 armored personnel carriers approached Syrian positions in the eastern Syrian province of Homs, along the highway, and the local Syrian government forces opened fire on the U.S. troops. The U.S. forces quickly turned their heads after being attacked. The casualties were not disclosed. Subsequently, the U.S. military dispatched several fighter planes to carry out airstrikes and retaliate against local Syrian government positions, resulting in the death of a Syrian soldier."

However, sources of Syrian opposition armed forces stated that at least more than a dozen Syrian government forces were killed in the raid. Moreover, the U.S. military is still planning to launch a larger-scale retaliatory action.

In response, the Pentagon stated that any deliberate attacks on the US military are unacceptable provocations. The U.S. military will take measures to combat this behavior.

Russian military expert Samsonov pointed out that although the U.S. and Syrian government forces have been hostile to each other for several years, the conflicts between the two sides have been concentrated in agent wars, such as the pro-American opposition forces and the Syrian government forces fighting with each other, or the U.S. military fighter planes. There was no such face-to-face ground conflict with the Syrian army airstrikes. The U.S. and U.S. retaliation and revenge on the ground will cause the situation in Syria to completely get out of control if it is dealt with carelessly. It is very likely that both the U.S. and Russian forces will be involved in a positive conflict. in.

How much do we want to praise the courage of Syrian soldiers, come on! More to destroy some invaders! Back to Sohu, see more
Statement: This article only represents the author himself, Sohu is the information release platform, Sohu only provides information storage space services.
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.rt.com/news/430603-iran-us-syria-vietnam-war/


HomeWorld News

US will suffer ‘another Vietnam’ in Syria, Iranian leader’s top aide warns
Published time: 22 Jun, 2018 18:55
Get short URL
5b2d0975dda4c82e638b4587.jpg

FILE PHOTO: © Khalil Ashawi / Reuters
  • 463

  • 3



A senior adviser to Iran’s supreme leader has condemned the United States’ uninvited military presence in Syria, warning that the conflict in the country could become a second Vietnam War for Washington.
Ali Akbar Velayati, a top aide on international affairs for Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, blamed the United States for the creation of Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) and said that the US military’s continued presence in Syria would result in catastrophe.
Read more
US-led airstrike ‘kills 8 people’ in Syria’s Deir ez-Zor – state media
"The Americans themselves have created [IS] and Al-Nusra in Syria and now they have come onto the scene and occupied Eastern Euphrates," Velayati said in Tehran on Wednesday, as quoted by Fars. "They should know that Syria and Eastern Euphrates will be another Vietnam for the US," he added.
Several thousand US special forces are believed to be embedded with proxy forces in eastern Syria – although the United States military has not been invited to operate inside the country, and it has no international mandate to do so. With the war against Islamic State all but over, the US-backed forces – aided by US air support – currently occupy pockets of Syrian territory.
Although the conflict’s complexity makes it a logistical nightmare for the occupying forces, experts questioned whether the United States would ever commit enough ground forces to make its Syria operations as catastrophic as the war in Vietnam.

“Iraq after 2003 was more like a Second Vietnam because the US had so many thousands of troops occupying the country and vulnerable to attack by insurgents,” Mark Almond, director of the Crisis Research Institute in the UK, told RT. “In Syria, the Americans (British and French too) have far fewer troops on the ground – special forces – and rely on proxies to do the fighting so the capacity of local forces to inflict heavy or steady casualties on them is relatively low. The US air force is willing to attack on suspicion any forces on the ground which it considers ‘threatening’ – a vague and broad category – and there is little or nothing that Syrian forces or local militias can do against the US planes.”
Read more
US military advisers came under attack in Syria’s Al-Tanf – coalition
However, Almond noted that without more boots on the ground, the United States and its allies will not be able to control Syrian territory in the long-term. With Washington’s policy on Syria constantly changing – US President Donald Trump announced in April that he wanted to bring the troops home, but now they are apparently digging in, from Al-Tanf to Manbij – the question now becomes whether the Pentagon is considering a larger presence in Syria.

“The Iranian official speaks theoretically: If the US continues to grow its presence in Syria it could become another Vietnam for them,” said Vladimir Batyuk, head of the Political and Military Research Unit at the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute for USA and Canada Studies. “If the United States is going to grow its presence or not is a big question. There is no consensus in Washington on this matter. If US President Trump would be the only one to decide, then the US troops would leave Syria by tomorrow. But there are other powerful figures in Washington who are convinced that the US presence in Syria is necessary. At this point, the US is unlikely to grow its presence if the situation won’t change drastically.”

Batyuk said that since Syria’s stability is a top priority for Tehran, Velayati’s statement should be seen as a warning to Washington that “its ill-judged actions could have far-reaching consequences.” But for the time being, it’s unlikely that thousands of US soldiers in Syria will be going home in body bags – mostly because there’s only about 2,000 of them there to begin with.

“At this moment there are 2,000 US special forces in Syria. Of course, it isn’t enough for any military operations on the ground in Syria,” Batyuk said. “The US supports the Kurds and the so-called moderate rebels, who are actually Islamists in disguise. The US could use air support from the anti-ISIS coalition for some purposes but not much more. So, the concerns of Tehran officials are unlikely to materialize.”

Tehran’s warnings come after Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in April that US forces were “positioning” themselves in eastern Syria.

“The US pledged that their only aim was to repel terrorists from Syria, to defeat [IS], but, despite all their claims, despite President Trump's claims, the US is actually positioning itself on the Eastern bank of the Euphrates and have no intention of leaving,” Lavrov said.
Like this story? Share it with a friend!
 
Top