• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Alien will give earth a Strike to prevent man from killing Earth. Proven by Videos

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal

http://ktla.com/2018/03/22/nasa-bra...hat-asteroid-could-strike-earth-in-117-years/

NASA Braces for Small Possibility That Asteroid Could Strike Earth in 117 Years
Posted 3:21 PM, March 22, 2018, by CNN Wire



There’s a possibility that an asteroid could hit Earth in 117 years.

NASA has announced that on September 22, 2135, there is a small chance an asteroid a third of a mile across (named Bennu) will slam into the Earth with an impact energy equivalent to the currently deployed arsenal of US nuclear ballistic missiles.


Deflecting the massive asteroid was the focus of recent research at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, which released this photo.

But NASA has a plan. In a theoretical exercise, a team of engineers devised a conceptual design of the Hypervelocity Asteroid Mitigation Mission for Emergency Response vehicle, or HAMMER. It is a hypothetical spacecraft that could either ram into Bennu or target it with a nuclear device, either of which it is hoped would deflect the asteroid away from Earth.

HAMMER is not an actual NASA program, but rather an investigation into the technical challenges that would arise in building such a device. The 1998 movies “Armageddon” and “Deep Impact” were dramatizations of broadly similar efforts.

While it is rather unlikely that Bennu will actually hit Earth, it is inevitable that eventually a similar one will. The probability of an impact is high for smaller rocks and decreases rapidly for larger asteroids.

In 2013, a meteor about 60 feet (20 meters) across hit the Earth near Chelyabinsk in Russia. This relatively small rock still did considerable damage. It released about 30 times as much energy as the nuclear explosion at Hiroshima, blowing out glass windows and causing 1,500 people to seek medical attention.

It was small enough that the energy was mostly dissipated in the atmosphere, although a few rocks hit Earth. At the other end of the spectrum was a meteor about 10 miles (16 kilometers) in diameter that hit the Yucatan Peninsula 65 million years ago with enough energy to wipe out the dinosaurs as a dominant form of life on Earth. This meteor left a crater about 100 miles (150 kilometers) across.

Meteors like the Chelyabinsk one are fairly common, hitting the Earth every few years, while those on the scale of the Yucatan one happen perhaps every 100 million years or so. In between are impacts comparable to the Bennu asteroid, which are also fairly rare, perhaps once every 100,000 years.

But even smaller meteors can cause considerable damage. And they are surprisingly common, although luckily most impacts occur over the oceans or uninhabited regions around the globe. An impact of even a modest-sized meteor could have catastrophic consequences if it were to occur over a large city. Humanity would have to intervene to avoid massive loss of life. Ideally, that intervention would be a mission like HAMMER to avoid the collision entirely.

In the asteroid-deflection business, warning is everything. A small amount of force applied to an asteroid many years before a predicted impact can easily alter the asteroid’s orbit, while a last minute intervention could require so much force that it might well be impossible to avoid the impact.

With that in mind, NASA set up a program whose chief executive has what could well be the coolest title of any position in any organization: Planetary Defense Officer. The Planetary Defense Coordination Office oversees studies of mitigation efforts (like HAMMER and others) but also the near Earth orbit, or NEO, observations program. The Center for NEO Studies is dedicated to watching the skies, looking for large space rocks in orbits that could intersect the Earth.

CNEOS has discovered approximately 18,000 near-Earth objects, with nearly 1,000 of them being over a kilometer in size. Those, of course, are the most dangerous ones. The NEO search program has existed in various forms since the 1970s.

In 1998, NASA was directed by the Congressional Committee on Science, Space and Technology to look for possible threats of asteroids larger than a kilometer. The program has become more sophisticated over the last two decades.

There are a bunch of NEOs out there and astronomers have found perhaps 90% of those larger than a kilometer and a lesser fraction of smaller ones. Of all NEOs found, NASA’s programs were responsible for 98% of the discoveries, with other astronomers finding the others. At a very modest fraction of NASA’s overall budget, this office is the sentinel, watching and waiting, warning us of potentially serious dangers. This is an important effort and one well worth our support.

Will Bennu hit Earth in 2135? Probably not.

But the Earth will definitely be hit again. It’s not a matter of if, but when.

We live in a cosmic shooting gallery and one day a bullet will head our way. And, when that fateful day comes, I very much hope that the good astronomers involved in NEO searches will have saved the day.

Trademark and Copyright 2018 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.


CLICK HERE FOR ALIEN VIDEO:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/935730/Atacama-alien-corpse-Chile-truth



Express. Home of the Daily and Sunday Express.
Apps Puzzles Horoscopes Shop Paper
7°C


REVEALED: Shock truth about 'Atacama alien' corpse that UFO hunters said 'changed history'
THE so called Atacama alien corpse has been hailed as possible proof of aliens visiting Earth ever since allegedly being discovered in a leather pouch behind an abandoned church in the Atacama Desert of Chile in 2003. Known as the Atacama Alien or Atacama Humanoid, the six-inch long mummified skeleton was put forward by UFO believers as a potential world-changing discovery that could be of alien origin.
By Jon Austin
PUBLISHED: 19:26, Thu, Mar 22, 2018 | UPDATED: 19:41, Thu, Mar 22, 2018

fb.png


tw.png


g-plus.png


m.png


sh.png

2

c.png


Mysterious miniature skeleton causes UFO investigation
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.

Share this video
Twitter Facebook Google+ Email
Direct LinkStart FromEmbed Code

Dr Steven Greer, a former emergency doctor who has become one of the world's leading so-called "alien disclosure" campaigners featured it in a number of documantaries as a possible history-changing find that had many anomalies meaning that it may not be human, including ten, instead of 12 ribs, a large cone-shaped head.

But scientists he commissioned to carry out further DNA tests have confirmed the corpse was a very unfortunate human being.

Test by experts at Stanford University and the University of California found the skeleton belonged to a human female baby, who suffered an array of genetic mutations.

She probably did not survive long after birth and it is believed the corpse could be no more than 40 years old.

Dr Garry Nolan, professor of microbiology and immunology at the Stanford University School of Medicine, began the scientific study after Dr Greer contacted him in 2012.

He said: “I had heard about this specimen through a friend of mine, there were some extraordinary claims put forward, and I managed to get a picture of it.

“You can't look at this specimen and not think it's interesting. It's quite dramatic. So I told my friend, 'Look, whatever it is, if it's got DNA, I can do the analysis."

Alien-Mummy-935730.jpg
Bhattacharya S Et Al

NOT ALIEN: The tiny skeleton was found to be human.
Related articles
I had heard about this specimen through a friend of mine, there were some extraordinary claims put forward, and I managed to get a picture of it.

Dr Garry Nolan

He took DNA from bone marrow in the ribs, comparing it to human and primate genomes.

These tests showed the mummy was human, and female.

The mix of Native American and European DNA was typical of the region of Chile.

The smallest baby ever born was recorded at 8.8 inches, so "Ata" as she is now called is history-making in that respect at nearly two inches shorter.

Genomic results found many mutations in seven genes that separately or in combinations contribute to various bone deformities, facial malformations or dwarfism.

Dr Nolan believes research into the fast bone aging could benefit medical science.

He said: "Maybe there's a way to accelerate bone growth in people who need it, people who have bad breaks.

The most incredible mummified remains found
Thu, June 29, 2017
A mummified captain was found in a mystery boat drifting 40 miles from the shore, still sat in the seat where he is believed to have died. Take a look through the most extraordinary mummified remains found.

twitter.png


facebook.png


google.png


pinterest.png

Related articles
“The symptoms and size of this girl were extremely unusual. Nothing like this had been seen before. Certainly, nobody had looked into the genetics of it."

Dr Atul Butte, director of the Institute for Computational Health Sciences at the University of California-San Francisco, added: “For me, what really came of this study was the idea that we shouldn't stop investigating when we find one gene that might explain a symptom.

“It could be multiple things going wrong, and it's worth getting a full explanation, especially as we head closer and closer to gene therapy.

"We could presumably one day fix some of these disorders, and we're going to want to make sure that if there's one mutation, we know that - but if there's more than one, we know that too."

Dr Nolan said the corpse may be no more than 40 years old and should receive a proper burial now.

Steven Greer reveals reason behind governments UFO secrecy

Related articles
He said: "We now know that it's a child, and probably either a pre or post-term birth and death.

"I think it should be returned to the country of origin and buried according to the customs of the local people."
The research was published in the journal Genome Research.

Dr Greer has yet to comment on the findings.

Express.co.uk has tried to contact him through his US-based website.

Related articles



UFO INVASION: What is this mysterious alien DEATH CLOUD choking out the sky?



Is this PROOF of End of world? How Asteroid Bennu was discovered on THIS terrifying date




GOOD VIDOE HERE PSE CLICK:

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-garbage-patch-plastic-20180322-story.html


sters b
The Great Pacific Garbage Patch counts 1.8 trillion pieces of trash, mostly plastic




By Amina Khan
Mar 22, 2018 | 10:25 AM


More than 87,000 tons of ocean plastic are floating inside The Great Pacific Garbage Patch, a figure up to 16 times higher than previously estimated. This is 1.8 trillion pieces of trash, and plastic makes up 99.9% of this debris. (The Ocean Cleanup)


The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is getting greater. Twice the size of Texas, the floating mass of about 79,000 metric tons of plastic is up to 16 times larger than previously thought, according to scientists who performed an aerial survey.

The results, published Thursday in the journal Scientific Reports, reveal that this plastic blight in the Pacific Ocean is still growing at what the researchers called an "exponential" pace.

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch, or GPGP for short, is an accumulation of junk that has collected in the waters between California and Hawaii. The concentration of floating plastic in the patch ranges from tens to hundreds of kilograms per square kilometer. But much of it is hidden from the naked eye, partly because some of the plastic has been broken down into smaller and smaller bits over time. (It is not, as its name may suggest, an island.)

"It's quite frightening," said lead author Laurent Lebreton, an oceanographer with the Ocean Cleanup Foundation based in the Netherlands. Out in the stretch of these blue seas, we're so far from any human activity, there's nothing out there, and we still leave traces as a society."



SAVPM3BF7FH23P7QOCZAXVJ4U4.jpg

Researchers modeled the mass concentration of plastic in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, which has grown to twice the size of Texas. (Ocean Cleanup)
The GPGP is just one of many large garbage patches in the world's oceans, seeded and fed by humans who manufacture and then discard plastic products.

Plastics are meant to last, and that's great for carrying your groceries in thin bags or holding a six-pack. It's not so great when those plastics end up in the guts of sea turtles or strangle birds.

Large or small, plastics of all sizes can harm ocean life. Recent studies show that biofouled plastic can attract fish and seabirds and end up in the food chain. While the full effects of this aren't yet known, scientists worry that this can lead to malnutrition and other problems.

Researchers have tried to get a handle on the GPGP by dragging nets through parts of the patch and sampling the plastic they find. But this only gives them a partial view. For one thing, a team of boats can only see so much. For another, the mouths of the samplers they use are often too small to catch larger pieces of debris.

XDHPFMNL7BFHVJZAUKCVYXFDEY.jpg

A piece of floating debris snagged during an ocean sampling operation. (Ocean Cleanup)
Lebreton and his colleagues decided a bird's-eye view would help. The scientist recalled how it felt to fly low over this expanse of ocean, so far from human civilization, and still see its mark.

"It is a deep blue ocean, the water is super clear, and you just see all those things just floating around," he said. "It just feels so random."

In addition to their aerial surveys, the team also dispatched boats to sample the debris and bring it back to shore for analysis.

The researchers split the plastic they collected into four size categories: microplastic (0.05 to 0.5 centimeters), mesoplastic (0.5 to 5 cm), macroplastic (5 to 50 cm) and megaplastic (bigger than 50 cm).

Previous accounts of the debris have focused on the amount of microplastics in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. In this analysis, microplastics did make up 94% of the estimated 1.8 trillion pieces in the patch, but they only accounted for 8% of the total mass.

More than three-quarters of the junk actually came from larger fragments: mesoplastic and macroplastic.

SGQTT4OA5NCNHHI35T33TXMPMU.jpg

Plastic samples collected during a 2015 expedition by the Ocean Cleanup. (Ocean Cleanup)
Part of the reason that larger plastics outweighed the other categories was the preponderance of fishing nets, which accounted for 46% of the garbage patch's mass. Fishing nets are made to be durable, and when they float through the ocean, they entangle and kill animals in their path.

Fifty plastic items had readable production dates: One from 1977, seven from the 1980s, 17 from the 1990s, 24 from the 2000s and one from 2010. (It's not clear how long these items were actually in the water, Lebreton pointed out.) Some 386 pieces had words from nine different languages — a third were in Japanese and a third were in Chinese.


Plastic trash could top 13 billion tons by 2050. And recycling doesn't help much

Jul 21, 2017 | 5:00 AM

The researchers think some of the patch's recent growth may have been fueled by the 2011 Tohoku tsunami, which reportedly washed 4.5 million metric tons of debris into the sea. Scientists estimate that more than 30% of it could have been moved across the ocean surface.

The plastic that lived in the patch also shared certain characteristics, such as a small surface-to-volume ratio. Plastics with high surface-to-volume ratios, such as sheets and films, were probably biofouled or broken down into smaller fragments that did make it into the patch.

None of this, of course, counts all the plastics that may have sunk to the bottom of the ocean.

"Levels of plastic pollution in deep water layers and seafloor below the GPGP remain unknown," the study authors wrote.

That's the next step, Lebreton said — to measure how much plastic lies far below the surface.

To read this article in Spanish click here

[email protected]

Follow @aminawrite on Twitter for more science news and "like" Los Angeles Times Science & Health on Facebook.

MORE IN SCIENCE

Oceans on ancient Mars may have got an assist from volcanoes

Modified Pap tests can show early warning signs of other gynecological cancers

To avoid germs on an airplane, consider booking a window seat

UPDATES:

10:25 a.m.: This story has been updated with additional details and comment from Laurent Lebreton.
 
Last edited:

Tony Tan

Alfrescian
Loyal
Leave just some bits of rural areas to keep man kind for future.

Cities are the big SINNERS who caused destruction to earth and squandered most resources and produced most wastes. No use to rid garbage alone. Must rid man first. Cure from the source.
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://wtkr.com/2018/03/23/great-pacific-garbage-patch-now-three-times-the-size-of-france/

Great Pacific Garbage Patch now three times the size of France
Posted 8:10 am, March 23, 2018, by CNN Wire


A huge, swirling pile of trash in the Pacific Ocean is growing faster than expected and is now three times the size of France.

According to a three-year study published in Scientific Reports Friday, the mass known as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is about 1.6 million square kilometers in size — up to 16 times bigger than previous estimates.

Ghost nets, or discarded fishing nets, make up almost half the 80,000 metric tons of garbage floating at sea, and researchers believe that around 20% of the total volume of trash is debris from the 2011 Japanese tsunami.

s091517698.jpg

Plastic samples collected during the study by The Ocean Cleanup in the Pacific Ocean.

The study — conducted by an international team of scientists with The Ocean Cleanup Foundation, six universities and an aerial sensor company — utilized two aircraft surveys and 30 vessels to cross the debris field.

Along with nets to survey and collect trash, researchers used two six-meter-wide devices to measure medium to large-sized objects. An aircraft was also fitted with advanced sensors to collect 3D scans of the ocean garbage. They ended up collecting a total of 1.2 million plastic samples and scanned more than 300 square kilometers of ocean surface.

The bulk of the pile is made up of larger objects while only 8% of the mass is microplastics, or pieces smaller than 5 millimeters in size.

“We were surprised by the amount of large plastic objects we encountered,” Chief Scientist Julia Reisser said in a statement.

“We used to think most of the debris consists of small fragments, but this new analysis shines a new light on the scope of the debris.

‘The Trash Isles’
The patch is so big that last fall environmentalists called on the United Nations to declare the Great Pacific Garbage Patch a country, called “The Trash Isles,” complete with its own passport and currency, called debris.

They even solicited 200,000 people to become citizens, including celebrities Sir David Attenborough, Chris Hemsworth and Gal Gadot. Their first citizen was “former US vice president and environmentalist Al Gore.

Research scientist Britta Denise Hardesty, who wasn’t involved in this study, said while discarded nets may make up almost half of the findings, the problem may be more nuanced.

Hardesty was part of an earlier study published in Marine Policy in October that also found that discarded fishing gear make up a significant amount of global marine plastic pollution. It’s estimated 640,000 tons of fishing gear is lost to the marine environment each year.

“lt’s not fair to just blame it on the fishermen or the top 20 countries for mismanaging waste,” said Hardesty, principal research scientist for the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) in Australia. “Instead we need to look at the true value and cost of plastics, and factor in the costs of livelihood and tourism.”

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch was first discovered in 1997 by oceanographer Charles Moore when he sailed home to Southern California after finishing the Transpacific Yacht Race, from California to Hawaii.

“I was confronted, as far as the eye could see, with the sight of plastic,” wrote Moore about his discovery in Natural History.

“In the week it took to cross the subtropical high, no matter what time of day I looked, plastic debris was floating everywhere: bottles, bottle caps, wrappers, fragments.”

As for slowing down the onslaught of ocean garbage, Hardesty says we all can help.

“Plastic pollution in the ocean is visible and trackable,” said Hardesty. “We can definitely make a difference in how we vote with our pocketbook and think about each decision we make, whether we take our own bags to the supermarkets, refuse straws, bring our own coffee cups, accept single-use items or think about mindful alternatives.”

Trademark and Copyright 2018 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.


Filed in: News

Topics: Environment, Great Pacific Garbage Patch
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/science/2018/03/22/great-pacific-garbage-patch-grows/446405002/

World's largest collection of ocean garbage is now twice the size of Texas
Doyle Rice, USA TODAY Published 10:10 a.m. ET March 22, 2018 | Updated 2:36 p.m. ET March 22, 2018


TWEETLINKEDIN 53 COMMENTEMAILMORE
The world's largest collection of ocean garbage is growing.

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch, a collection of plastic, floating trash located halfway between Hawaii and California, has grown to more than 600,000 square miles, a study published Thursday finds. That's twice the size of Texas.

Winds and converging ocean currents funnel the garbage into a central location, said study lead author Laurent Lebreton of the Ocean Cleanup Foundation, a non-profit organization that spearheaded the research.

First discovered in the early 1990s, Lebreton said the trash in the patch comes from countries around the Pacific Rim, including nations in Asia as well as North and South America.

The patch is not a solid mass of plastic. It includes some 1.8 trillion pieces of plastic and weighs 88,000 tons — the equivalent of 500 jumbo jets. The new figures are as much as 16 times higher than previous estimates.

636572386247113311-032118-great-garbage-patch-Online.png

The research — the most complete study ever undertaken of the garbage patch — was published Thursday in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Scientific Reports.

Much of the garbage is rather large. "We were surprised by the amount of large plastic objects we encountered,” said Julia Reisser, also of the foundation. “We used to think most of the debris consists of small fragments, but this new analysis shines a new light on the scope of the debris."

The study was based on a three-year mapping effort conducted by an international team of scientists affiliated with the Ocean Cleanup Foundation, six universities and an aerial sensor company.

More: Our trash is harming the deepest fish in the ocean

More: Humans have produced 18.2 trillion pounds of plastic since the 50s. That's equal in size to 1 billion elephants.

Sadly, the Pacific patch isn't alone. The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is the largest of five known such trash collections in the ocean, Lebreton said.

This video shows the devastating plastic waste that is overtaking the waters near Bali. Buzz60

Scientists are working with the European Space Agency to take photos of the various garbage patches from space.

With no governments stepping up to clean up the trash in the world's oceans, which are in international waters, it's up to privately funded groups like the Ocean Cleanup Foundation to take the lead on getting rid of the garbage.

And there's a sense of urgency, said Joost Dubois, a spokesman with the foundation. It will be far easier to collect the trash while most of it is rather large before it breaks down into smaller pieces, he said.

"It's a ticking time bomb of larger material," Dubois said. "We've got to get it before it breaks down into a size that's too small to collect and also dangerous for marine life."

Since plastic has only been around since the 1950s, there's no way of knowing exactly how long it will last in the ocean. If left alone, the plastic could remain there for decades, centuries or even longer.

"How long plastic may remain in the ocean is a big unknown, but unless we begin to remove it, some would say it may remain there forever," Lebreton said.

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 53 COMMENTEMAILMORE
 

TemaseX

Alfrescian
Loyal
Want to sky in RED SNOW? It is snowing red in Sochi today! What had man done?

0
Posted on March 23, 2018 by tim






Today, March 23 unusual photos being posted across the social networks from Sochi ski resort. The snow in the mountains became covered with red sand. People think it has reached Russian from the Sahara desert. Here are some photos.















sochi_06.jpg






Advertisement
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eeling-scientists-say/?utm_term=.1b492743d6a0

An alien star sideswiped our solar system and sent comets reeling, scientists say


by Sarah Kaplan March 23 at 12:48 PM Email the author
HANMSV4EFI6RPH6VXU6NSBWZUM.jpg

An artist's conception of Scholz's star and its brown dwarf companion during its flyby of the solar system 70,000 years ago. The Sun, the small white light in the background, would have appeared as a brilliant star. (Michael Osadciw/University of Rochester)

Some 70,000 years ago, when humans and Neanderthals shared the planet, an alien star streaked through the outer edges of our solar system and jostled its contents, astronomers say. In a study of hundreds of solar system objects with unusual orbits, the scientists also noted eight comets that may have interstellar origins.

This idea that a star recently sideswiped our solar system was first raised three years ago by University of Rochester astronomer Eric Mamajek. He and his colleagues had noticed something strange while studying a binary stellar system named Scholz's star, which comprises two small, dim stars orbiting each other. Even though Scholz's star is just 20 light-years from Earth — a near neighbor, by astronomical standards — it appeared to move incredibly slowly across the night sky. The best explanation was that Scholz's star was cruising away from us. Which means at some point, it must have been quite close by.

Of 10,000 simulations of the star's potential orbits, 98 percent showed it passing through the inner Oort cloud — a region of scattered tiny icy bodies encircling the edge of the solar system. Even at its closest approach, within 0.8 of a light-year of the sun, the dim star would have been 50 times too faint to be seen by the naked eye. It probably flew through the solar system unnoticed by anyone living in it.

Speaking of Science newsletter

The latest and greatest in science news.



There is a very, very small chance that prehistoric hominins did look up to see a new red light in the sky: Mamajek and his colleagues point out that magnetic activity may have caused Scholz's star to flare, producing a brief burst of visible light.

VAWFSQGVCMZAFCW42R4QHYVOJA.jpg

At a time when modern humans and Neanderthals shared the planet, Scholz's star approached our solar system. But it is unlikely that ancient hominins would have seen the interstellar visitor. (José A. Peñas/SINC)
But Scholz's star did leave other evidence of its passing, scientists say. The new study, published in the May edition of the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, bolsters Mamajek's original theory by looking at the paths of more than 300 small bodies in our solar system with hyperbolic orbits.

Unlike most planets, asteroids and the like, which journey around the sun on elliptical paths, bodies with hyperbolic orbits track a V-shaped path through the solar system. The study authors found three dozen of these bodies seemed to originate in the direction of the constellation Gemini, rather than being distributed evenly across the sky. This pattern squares nicely with the trajectory of Scholz's star, said lead author Carlos de la Fuente Marcos, an astronomer at the Complutense University of Madrid, in Spain.

The researchers also point out eight comets with high radial velocities that warrant follow-up observations. These fast-moving balls of ice and dust may also have interstellar origins, the researchers say.

Mamajek, the lead author of the 2015 study, told Gizmodo the new paper was solid, adding that Scholz's star is probably just the most recent example of a stellar visitation. But other researchers questioned the study's methods and the reliability of its conclusions, given that it's based on a mishmash of comet data by biased human observers.

De la Fuente Marcos responded to that criticism in an email to The Post, pointing out that 22 percent of the observed objects with the highest inbound speeds were coming from the same part of the sky. Even if the comet database is biased to include only objects spotted by humans, he said, it wouldn't explain why so many fast-moving objects originated in the direction of Gemini.

Scientists have seen one interstellar voyager — the cigar-shaped asteroid 'Oumuamua, named for the Hawaiian word for “scout,” which passed through the solar system last year.

'Oumuamua would have been too far away to be affected by Scholz's star 70,000 years ago, de la Fuente Marcos says. But a separate study, also published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, reports that the recent visitor was probably flung from a binary star system like Scholz's star. According to the analysis, systems of two stars orbiting one another are more likely to eject rocky bodies as well as icy ones.

Read more:
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.valuewalk.com/2018/03/scholzs-star-flyby-may-still-be-affecting-our-solar-system/

Scholz’s Star Flyby May Still Be Affecting Our Solar System
March 23, 2018 5:20 pm by Michelle Jones


Astronomers believe an alien star that flew by Earth thousands of years ago is still impacting the way objects in our solar system move. A new study on Scholz’s star builds on another team’s work from a few years ago, and astronomers say it offers further evidence about what they believe was the closest flyby of an interstellar object to our sun ever.


skeeze / Pixabay
New data pertaining to Scholz’s star

Researcher Carlos de la Fuente Marcos and his team from the Complutense University of Madrid and the University of Cambridge published their study in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters (available free here, hat tip to Space.com). The analyzed the movement of 339 different asteroids, comets and other bodies in our solar system which have orbits that are hyperbolic in shape rather than elliptical or circular, tracking their current positions back through time.

Based on their simulations, they believe that these objects’ orbits were shifted off their natural course by a visitor from outside our solar system: an alien star now called Scholz’s star, in honor of the astronomer who discovered it. The alien star is actually a binary star system made up of a red dwarf star orbited by a smaller brown dwarf star, they explained, and when it passed by our solar system, they say it probably had a reddish tint to it.

In a statement, the researchers explained that theoretically, we would expect the positions of these solar system bodies to be distributed evenly across the sky, especially those that came from the Oort Cloud. Instead, they observed what de la Fuente Marcos describes as “a statistically significant accumulation of radiants.” He also said the pattern projects towards the constellation known as Gemini, following the trajectory they believe Scholz’s star took as it flew through our solar system.

Scholz’s star believed to have graced our solar system

Before this latest study, astronomers already believed that Scholz’s star passed within one light-year of our sun about 70,000 years ago. While a light-year isn’t exactly a short distance, it certainly is relative to the current position of our sun’s closest neighbor that’s outside our solar system, which is more than 4 light-years away. As another point of reference, Scholz’s star is now about 20 light-years away, according to astronomers.

According to de la Fuente Marcos, the alien star only affected the orbits of the smaller bodies that were closest to it when it buzzed by our solar system. He believes the close encounter exerted a gravitational pull on these objects, pulling them off their previous course and into a hyperbolic orbit rather than the usual round or elliptical orbits seen throughout space.

Astronomers say some of the space objects that follow a hyperbolic orbit could be from other star systems, like Oumuamua, the strange needle-shaped object that astronomers believe to be the first foreigner to visit our solar system. However, de la Fuente Marcos’ team now believes that some of these objects are native to our solar system but were pulled off their previous course by the visit of the alien star system.
 
Top