Alex Au - How about zero tolerance of bad employers, huh?

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
SMRT Corp is 54-percent owned by Temasek Holdings, the government’s investment vehicle.

The government has also said, repeatedly, that workers should have “discussed” their issues with management. Knowing Chinese workers, I am sure they have, many times and loudly. It’s in their nature. The problem is that the system is stacked against them. It’s a very Singaporean system: where lower-rank people don’t have rights to justice, but can only plead for better treatment. It’s a microcosm of the political system this government has created. Citizens have no substantive rights; they can only plead for their wishes to be taken into account. There’s a term for this: The petitionary state.

Wage bargaining everywhere else is conducted between unions and employers. Employers hold the nuclear option of termination. Unions hold the nuclear option of calling a mass walk-out. The bargaining that results may be robust, but is, at least, meaningful.

As some commentators have already pointed out, this SMRT incident is forcing Singapore to address the issue of unionising foreign workers. Left unsaid is whether the government-linked union NTUC is the right vehicle. Of course it is not. For half a century, it has served as a whip helping the government keep Singaporean workers in line; it would be even more useless for foreign workers.

All workers, foreign and local, need independent unions. Far from what the mainstream rhetoric will no doubt try to convince us, they will be good for Singapore. It is a truism that systems must have safety valves. There must be ways to negotiate and rebalance rather than try to keep the screws on so tight till the whole shebang blows apart. Especially in times of rising income inequality, the stresses are growing.

To keep insisting that the old ways of command and control must continue, that the law and media must serve the supremacy of executive government and its related companies, and workers must work and behave, is a sure recipe for a day when things really blow apart.

- http://yawningbread.wordpress.com/2...ike-government-messaging-goes-into-overdrive/
 
Independent unions? How do we oppress aliens then? As usual, nothing new from this bapok troublemaker.
 
Nothing wrong with being bapok if his views are good for us. I believe in independent unions too, both for locals and foreigners. It's all about contractual agreements, and at the end of the day, that's what it boils down to at the bargaining table. FTs have diff set of agreements so I have no trouble with accepting that there can be indep unions for FTs. Local unions can demand that such contractual agreements must be different for the citizenship to be meaningful. No such thing as FTs and locals have same terms. No way.
 
Nothing wrong with being bapok if his views are good for us.

It may be just me but I find it very difficult to take the views of a homosexual seriously.

As for contractual agreements these chinamen drivers signed one. They then decided to dishonor what they had previously agreed to. For that, they should be caned and jailed.
 
I don't know. I take a different view here about the nature of who is considered a credible commentator. If someone whose views and lifestyle have for many years been known to be very liberal, then anything he writes or says would automatically be dismissed by others as an irrelevance. They would simply say, "What do you expect from that guy!" Who, but those of the same social and political persuasion, would take him seriously? It is akin to watching Fox News. You watch it knowing full well that you will be bombarded endlessly by conservative points of view. As such, you take anything in it with a grain of salt.

So, that is the paradox. Those on either extremes of the political spectrum will never be able to command majority support for their point of view.
 
It is akin to watching Fox News. You watch it knowing full well that you will be bombarded endlessly by conservative points of view. As such, you take anything in it with a grain of salt.

I love Fox news. I agree with most of the commentators. If "conservative" means being responsible for your own actions instead of blaming all your problems on someone else, then I'm full fledged supporter.
 
I love Fox news. I agree with most of the commentators. If "conservative" means being responsible for your own actions instead of blaming all your problems on someone else, then I'm full fledged supporter.

I watch it everyday... for laughs! Their election night meltdown was the best!
 
I watch it everyday... for laughs! Their election night meltdown was the best!

The reason why Obama won was pretty obvious. He won almost 80% of the non white vote and we all know what sort of scum this segment of society consists of. They're the ones who benefit most from the handouts.

The hardworking white folk, the ones who made America what it is today, are being rewarded with tax hikes.
 
The reason why Obama won was pretty obvious. He won almost 80% of the non white vote and we all know what sort of scum this segment of society consists of. They're the ones who benefit most from the handouts.

The hardworking white folk, the ones who made America what it is today, are being rewarded with tax hikes.

It's more than that. Obama won because:

1) Nobody wants a Mormon president.
2) The better Republicans have stayed away and are aiming for 2016. 2012's Republican candidates (including primary candidates) are freaks, psychos and flip-floppers. Romney is one of them.
 
The issue here is how to relook at Singapore's productivity and labor employment situation, first from a military logistics perspective(ex-our general input), then reprice the entire industry and subsidize (whatever wealth redistribution technique) the essential industries as well social infrastructure to balance the growth and development equation again. Problem is it will affect property prices downwards. But are the dogs in the Leegime for Singapore or for their own pockets?
 
It's more than that. Obama won because:

1) Nobody wants a Mormon president.
2) The better Republicans have stayed away and are aiming for 2016. 2012's Republican candidates (including primary candidates) are freaks, psychos and flip-floppers. Romney is one of them.

Any of them would have been better for America than that black guy. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top