• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Alex Au AIMs Blow Back Part Four

When people want to throw allegations without basis, the only way to deal with them is to sue them.

Alex Au chickened out, by the way.

By the way, Chiam also sued the MONGREL who bit his masters' hands LOUDHAILER chee soon juan - and won.

Typical PAP bullies. Can't handle the truth, resort to suing.
 
Last edited:
Your grammar is absolutely poor. Please do yourself and everyone else a favour by doing your utmost to improve your command of the language with which you choose to post here. You are at this moment a shoddy, fly-by-night, incompetent fool that insists on putting yourself and those that you support in a very poor light.

You just can't give up isn't it? The whole world out there is saying that the PAP side of story is riddled with so many holes that only the very idiotic can't smell it's fishy like hell. At all the year-end gatherings I attended, this was the hot topic of the party. Not one, and I repeat, not one person believe what the PAP had said, and these include civil servants mind you. To them, PAP's integrity is at its very lowest level now, if not absolutely zero.
 
When people want to throw allegations without basis, the only way to deal with them is to sue them.

Alex Au chickened out, by the way.

By the way, Chiam also sued the MONGREL who bit his masters' hands LOUDHAILER chee soon juan - and won.

PAP can use whatever legal means it wants to try to get Alex Au to retract this. But it would only be a hollow victory because hell alot of people out there had already read it and most importantly believed it. So PAP had lost again, because it is the mind of the people that's most crucial and right now, in the minds of the people, PAP's integrity had dropped yet another notch, a big drop at that, and to many, PAP has zero integrity now.
 
That is why I do hope that Alex starts to raise funds to fight against PAP,,in open court PAP will be even more discredited,,PAP is scare mongering to get AA to back down as these holes have embarrass PAP...now the PAPPIE dogs here are saying AA cant defend himself,,when the bloody PAP machinery will just eat anyone,,,

PAP is using force, fear and intimidation to silence its critics as it has always has. And its sad that with alternative media, there are PAP dogs now attacking the person who wrote a proper article,,,

well they devil will always have its supporters

You just can't give up isn't it? The whole world out there is saying that the PAP side of story is riddled with so many holes that only the very idiotic can't smell it's fishy like hell. At all the year-end gatherings I attended, this was the hot topic of the party. Not one, and I repeat, not one person believe what the PAP had said, and these include civil servants mind you. To them, PAP's integrity is at its very lowest level now, if not absolutely zero.
 
You all want to do damage, send this matter to Havard, Yale, Brown, Standford, Purdue and to Freedom House, see what happens lor. This event has happened, what do you think?
 
Last edited:
To those that are urging Alex to fight etc:
It is not the PAP who is taking action. It is the PM. Try winning against the PM in Court.
I would have thought the proper thing would have been the TCs and AIM together or separately to take action. However that seems to have been judged unwise.The funny thing is that Alex is not damaged by this. In politics it is the court of public opinion that matters. Who do you think is winning there ? People are discussing this not based on rumors and innuendo. They are referring to published documents , statements and timelines of events. Interesting Times.
 
Asking the PM to take action via CPIB was always playing with fire.

There are more valid ways to attack the PAPzis, THP and AIM in this saga. The aim should have been to show how the PAPzis have hurt the pockets of its citizens through this scheme that THP cooked up. The way in which IP from citizens was transferred to a private entity which would cost citizens more in the future is the main issue. Everything else is not necessarily wrong. From their own mouths they have shown themselves to be incompetent in managing the property of its citizens and this is where the barrage should be aimed at.

Firstly, any government should be interested in lowering costs for its citizens. To achieve economies of scale the ownership of the software should already have been centralised from the onset and not prior to its lifespan coming to an expiry. Then why should citizens, owners of the software living in opposition wards have to forfeit their ownership of the software while citizens living in PAP wards can continue with the ownership.

Were the shares of the citizens from the opposition wards sold off and how did they benefit?

THP's explanation on how AIM ended up owning the software is even more ridiculous. Not only did he look into the matter too close to the expiry of the original contract but he spent valuable money to hire a consultant to advise on basic matters. Not only was the advise provided simple, ie. achieve economies of scale and upgrade the laden operating system but the discharge based on the advice seems contrary at best.

Rather than centralise the ownership the ownership was sold off at what looks to be less than market value and allowed the new owner the right to terminate individual town councils at one month's notice. Such a termination policy was never in the original contract and that it was established in the new contract goes totally against a central, single ownership as prescribed by D & T and which according to THP was what he was trying to establish.

The end result of a savings of $8000 will go into a net loss as time passes by. It is foolish to even have brought it up. As time passes by, the town councils will have forked out much more than they were paid by AIM. The time where AIM begins to earn more than it paid to the town councils is only days away if one calculates the payable fees that THP himself has announced.

Therefore the issue of having central ownership was never established in the renewed contract with the new owners. We should also not forget that citizens living in opposition wards have lost their ownership rights without any recourse and without any benefit in kind. Given these two reasons, we can safely say that THP has managed the renewal of the contract poorly and this of course reflects badly on the PAPzis.

Please concentrate on these two issues as they are salient and clear cut. Stay away from barking up the wrong tree by asking for CPIB intervention. You should have sufficient ammunition to show that the PAPzis have put the interest of the citizens as a lower priority and their management standards are ridiculously poor as epitomised by THPs actions and his eventual explanation.
 
I disagree with Alex Au. Teo's statements made perfect sense to me.
Note that Alex Au throwed questions and suspicions that he could not prove and convince anyone to believe one way or another,
At the same time, he sidestepped the glaringly misleading statements made by Sylvia Lim concerning the termination of service by AIM.

Given the above, how can Alex be a honest broker in his commentary? All this don't add to his credibility as a political commentator.

I don't care whether you agreed with Alex or not. Teo's statement about our perfect match makes sense to me. I noted that you always throw out after swallowing my cum and I am convince you could not take more than what is enough. I don't need to prove it in any way, whether you do it squatting or lying down.
At the same time while sucking my dick you always think of my ex Sylvia and make misleading statement about her even though I have told you about our aimless relationship have been terminated
From the above you can see how honest I am in my commentary about your capabilities and this could add to your abilities as a professional cum taker.
 
Last edited:
But it would only be a hollow victory because hell alot of people out there had already read it and most importantly believed it.

More importantly, lots of people have backed up Alex Au's material. I am reminded of how Christopher Balding's previous blog had been mysteriously taken down by the host. Now he is up and running on a new blog and his older material is still intact.

Hey Loong, thank you for the legal action and controversy. Now more people will hear of this AIM scandal.
 
My eyes are open. It's a simple case of outsourcing computer services that backfired on WP because they were clearly incompetent.
To cover up their incompetence, Sylvia went on attack mode thru lies

I know your eyes are always open because of the sight of my....eh..you know what. It not a simple one you know... I can do front fire and back fire and it is clearly incomparable even if you outsource it. Shut your mouth about our relationship and Sylvia will not attack you.
 
Back
Top