AirAsia Suspense Flights To Europe

Windsor

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Messages
3,985
Points
0
<cite>January 13, 2012 - 11:57AM</cite>

AirAsia X axes flights and the real loser is the traveller
Friday Reflections - By B.K. Sidhu

LONDON, Paris, New Delhi and Mumbai are off limits to low fares after March.

AirAsia X (AAX) finally dropped a bombshell yesterday saying it was axing those routes. Mumbai will be off its radar screen by end-January and the rest in March.
This has come after the airline's denial on cuts.

I first broke the news on Dec 10 that AAX was “looking at giving up some routes, such as Mumbai and Europe, in exchange for Sydney and some China routes.''
Many of us can still remember the excitement when AirAsia head honco Tan Sri Tony Fernandes announced that AAX would fly people to London for as low as RM9.90 one way in 2007. Then AAX brought smiles to so many faces. However, yesterday it only brought sadness.

Students studying in Britain had been happy and so were their relatives and friends. It was like a dream come true because at premium airfares, not many can afford to fly to London.
The same was for the Delhi route and there were many happy travellers going to India every two months at one-way fares of only RM74 before tax.
But all these are going away.

After the announcement, Fernandes was busy defending the route cut on Twitter, saying “AirAsia is separate from AAX'' and warned that “AAX pulls out of India due to high airport charges. Malaysia heading that way if cost not brought under control.''

The reasons AAX gave for the cuts were high jet fuel prices, weakening demand for air travel from Europe led by the current economic situation together with exorbitant government taxes.

“All these have placed cost pressures on operating long-haul low-cost flights between Asia and Europe, compromising our ability to offer the low fares AAX is known for,'' it said.
To some that is a lame excuse as all that costs (airport and fuel charges) can be passed on to the traveller. Every airline faces that challenge so it is nothing unique. They should just say the routes are bleeding and they can't go on.

It is a major let-down for the travellers after all the hype about low cost and low fares, though any business has the right to make viable commercial decisions. All these axing and sharing appear to be part of the share swap and collaboration agreement inked in August last year. Under the arrangement both AirAsia/AAX and MAS will work together and not fight so the element of competition will be blurred.

So AAX gives up some slots to MAS in return for Sydney (AAX flying there on April 1 and ticket sales begin next week), Beijing and eventually Jeddah. It's a trade-off. Some are also quick to conclude that it is another long-haul low-cost model failure after two failures seen with Skytrain by Sir Freddie Laker and Hong Kong's Oasis airline. It may not be, because AAX says it intends to focus on core markets such as Australasia, China, Taiwan, Japan and South Korea and Fernandes twits that “... AAX is learning. It's now got the magic formula and will soar. One aircraft type and the right range.''

In all this the loser is the traveller as you can forget about zero fares, RM10 or other cheap fares. Brace up for higher fares and premium services or else hope and pray the Middle Eastern airlines will offer promotional fares throughout the year. As a last resort, take a bus to Singapore and explore the options there is Jetstar, Indigo and, coming soon, Scoot.
The question is, are we heading to a monopoly state again in the sector for some routes? I wonder what the Competition Commission is up to these days.

http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/1/13/business/10254798&sec=business

 
hi i think they are not just suspending. They are saying its finito. I think the industry already got a whiff of this a while ago. The fuel costs and the drop in traffic on these sectors hit them really hard just like everyone else .
They now want to shift their operations elsewhere.
 
hi i think they are not just suspending. They are saying its finito. I think the industry already got a whiff of this a while ago. The fuel costs and the drop in traffic on these sectors hit them really hard just like everyone else .
They now want to shift their operations elsewhere.

Yes, that is true, the business model of low-cost budget travel selling tickets at $9.90 simply cannot be done, unlike short air travel-time. This business model of AirAsiaX that has been axed will also not work in those other routes they are attempting to switch to.
 
long distance low cost operations is very tricky. The highest cost component for these guys would be the fuel prices which they have no control over.

So they spend a fortune on fuel. To mitigate against further price increases they would probably do some hedging.

This could work against them as much as help them, so if they did indeed lose, then their costs for that period would be even more.

You couple this with falling revenue as the economic conditions keep travellers away and you can see why its really difficult.

Yes, that is true, the business model of low-cost budget travel selling tickets at $9.90 simply cannot be done, unlike short air travel-time. This business model of AirAsiaX that has been axed will also not work in those other routes they are attempting to switch to.
 
Global economy is also very bad. When people are worrying about their jobs, the last thing on their minds is a holiday
 
Europe charging carbon emission tax...heavy burden

Europe in crisis, not many want to travel out. One way traffic is killer.
 
Global economy is also very bad. When people are worrying about their jobs, the last thing on their minds is a holiday

The trouble with this screwed up planet is that only a few people are making decisions for the masses. These few, eg., Singapore has about 100, and USA about 500+ make all decisions for the rest of us that is suppose to improve our lives. Yet these policy makers are not doing a good job, enriching themselves at our expense.

The ills besetting everyone on this planet, if you narrow it down, are due to these clowns, the wars, the devastation of the forests, the global warming and etc. The masses voted them to do what is best for all, and what had they done so far? The entire planet is in a big bloody mess and we all are suffering.
 
The trouble with this screwed up planet is that only a few people are making decisions for the masses. These few, eg., Singapore has about 100, and USA about 500+ make all decisions for the rest of us that is suppose to improve our lives. Yet these policy makers are not doing a good job, enriching themselves at our expense.
.....

Some believe that events in the world are being manipulated by some enitity e.g. Rothschilds, jews, illuminati,.... :confused:
 
Suspense flights. For those who love Hitchcock in a cockpit
 
The trouble with this screwed up planet is that only a few people are making decisions for the masses...... The entire planet is in a big bloody mess and we all are suffering.

Speak for yourself. You are likely to be warded at IMH soon - see a doctor. The world is coming to an end - for you. Pray to God. Carry a kavadi. Or whip yourself. Burn more kim or hell money. Yo may feel better.
 
The trouble with this screwed up planet is that only a few people are making decisions for the masses. These few, eg., Singapore has about 100, and USA about 500+ make all decisions for the rest of us that is suppose to improve our lives. Yet these policy makers are not doing a good job, enriching themselves at our expense.

The ills besetting everyone on this planet, if you narrow it down, are due to these clowns, the wars, the devastation of the forests, the global warming and etc. The masses voted them to do what is best for all, and what had they done so far? The entire planet is in a big bloody mess and we all are suffering.

So what is your solution? 3million people making decisions? You either lead, follow or get out of the way.
 
Good move. The money is in Asia now. Lots of idiots in asia willing to splurge.
 
tony's tune group has a 20% share of MAS. so MAS-Airasia now operating like a monopoly.
 
Yes, that is true, the business model of low-cost budget travel selling tickets at $9.90 simply cannot be done, unlike short air travel-time. This business model of AirAsiaX that has been axed will also not work in those other routes they are attempting to switch to.

Hi..the problem with the Budget airline model as I see it,,is it is not cheap for long haul of certain international flights.. Like that way its made out to be. Maybe for domestic routes like KL to Singapore, or KL to Kuching and short haul flights etc it will be cheaper. But the budget airline model is u buy it when its on special so go that 9.99 fare etc. The rest of the time, the normal air ticket price is comparable to full service airlines. However as a normal traveller,,each time i i go into their website,,,I find there is limited value in the fairs, like its only 20% cheaper. and u have to suffer through budget airports, no food, no entertainment it does not justify the savings.

Further more, I do not take budget airlines when there is transfer or stops as it does not justify the price and too much risk involve. U have to buy air tickets separately, check out than check in again, have to ensure there is 4 hours in between flights due to the check out and in again.. all this for a 20% DISCOUNT, where got worth ah?
and yr 1st flight get delayed and u miss your interconnecting flight,,good luck man,,than to avoid it,,buy insurance,,in the end the price does not justify it..

Also for this long haul flight, if there is no discount and buy it on the web as per normal,,the price will not be much different from full service airlines.,..so what is the point? and for Full service airlines,,they do have many specials when it is off peak season,, its the same as budget.

Dont get me wrong, budget still has its place,..but their modelling need to change,,they are just and sometimes even more expensive than full service airlines..when there are no specials..
 
Hi..the problem with the Budget airline model as I see it,,is it is not cheap for long haul of certain international flights.. Like that way its made out to be. normal air ticket price is comparable to full service airlines. However as a normal traveller,,each time i i go into their website,,,I find there is limited value in the fairs, like its only 20% cheaper. and u have to suffer through budget airports, no food, no entertainment it does not justify the savings.

Also for this long haul flight, if there is no discount and buy it on the web as per normal,,the price will not be much different from full service airlines.,..so what is the point? and for Full service airlines,,they do have many specials when it is off peak season,, its the same as budget.

I cannot fully reply to your post as there is insufficient details. Unless you are willing to tell us the countries you traveled to, the frequency and purpose of your travel. As someone who frequently flies to Asean countries, SIN/JKT about S$30/= budget against S$300/= normal international flight or SIN/MLA about S$85/= budget against S$350/= normal international flight. Of course this is not always the case but more often than not, as seats being booked are filling up, the airfare will increase. Last passenger normally will pay the most and will do so because it is a must for him/her to take that particular flight. It happens all the time, that there are people booking at the last minute.

It depends mainly also whether you travel alone or as a family for then there is a massive amount you save. It depends on the person and how he views the advantage whether it is worth the effort. By planning your trips well in advance, you can actually get away by paying as little as S$10/= for return. For a short 3 hour flight, you don't really need a meal or the other frills. If you still find it necessary to enjoy your flight, then budget flights will not be suitable for you.
 
Back
Top