• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ah Neh Swindler Run Road! 49 Fools and their money parted!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
36,768
Points
113
The 49 fools should form a group like Keanu Reeves and his 49 Ronin and get their money back.

Haresh%20Govindaraju%20The%20New%20Paper.jpg


49 people invested $4 million of their money into a company but they haven't been able to get their money back and the company's bosses have also disappeared.

The company in question is San Tee Credit which was registered in 2006 and the company's manager is Mr Murali Krishnan Naidu. Mr Murali's wife, Madam Santhi M. K, is listed as the owner.

For some of the people who have lost their money, some of them were childhood friends of Mr Murali.

But they can no longer contact the couple.

So, two police reports against Madam Santhi have been made, and three lawsuits have also been filed.

One of the police reports are made by 32 investors who said that they had invested $3.13 million but have not "not received the promised full investment and principal payouts" from San Tee Credit.

But of the people who now cannot take their money back, it was their life savings that they had used to invest.

Nine of these people poured their sorrows out to The New Paper last week.

"I went to school with the both of them," 44-year old Sam, who is a part-time taxi driver, said.

"They were then dating each other. I am hurt that they have disappeared."

Sam poured in $190,000 of all the money that he had since 2010. He was told that he would get back 2.5 to 3.5 percent in returns every month.

But the money is now all gone and Sam is living "hand to mouth" every day.

It wasn't always like this. Initially, the returns were given back to the investors.

Mr Raja had invested $130,000 in the company. He had also gave a personal loan to $40,000 to Mr Murali, he said.

He said that it was in 2012 that the money earned stopping coming in.

San Tee Credit's law firm, M. Nedumaran & Co, then sent a letter to the investors in 2013 to say that the company was "revamping the nature of business" and could thus not give the money back to the investors.

But in March last year, Mr M. Nedumaran then wrote again to some of the investors and said that San Tee Credit's money could still not be taken out of the Philippines.

It was said that San Tee Credit had invested 139 million Philippine pesos (S$4.1 million) in two moneylending businesses in the Philippines. The two moneylenders were giving loans to Filipino soldiers.

San Tee Credit later also engaged a lawyer in the Philippines to send letters of demand to the two companies and said that it would take legal action if they do not return the principal investment and returns earned.

The investors in Singapore also received the letter.

But they were shocked.

"It was the first time I learnt that my money was being invested overseas," Mr Raja said.

"All along, I thought I was investing in San Tee Credit's moneylending business here.

"Nowhere in our contract did it mention investments in the Philippines."

Now, some of the investors are even blaming Mr Raja. He had previously worked for Mr Murali in another company for five years.

"Many investors and family members called me to say 'I should have known better'. But the truth is, I'm equally disappointed because I trusted him," he said.

But even Mr Raja hasn't been able to contact. April last year was the last time he managed to speak to Mr Murali. Mr Murali said he needed time.

Then, just two months later, Mr Murali could not be contacted on his phone line.

Everyone remained in confusion until October last year when several investors bumped into Mr Murali as they were looking for him.

He was driving into a condominium at King Albert Park in Bukit Timah.

So Mr Haresh Govindaraju, 47, ran to the car to try to stop it. But Mr Murali would not stop.

He kept driving and driving until the car stopped at a police post in Bukit Batok, all this while with Mr Haresh holding on to it.

At the police post, Mr Murali left quickly and left his wife there.

Both she and Mr Haresh then made a police report. A video of the incident quickly went viral.

Mr Haresh had invested nearly $142,000.

"We were childhood friends," he said.

"All I wanted was to talk to him and ask him about our money."

He tried contacting Mr Murali three more times between October and December last year but Mr Nedumaran told him that Mr Murali was no longer in Singapore.

Mr Murali also could not be contacted via email and were neither at his office at Genting Lane or his Yishun home.

In total, the three lawsuits are asking for a total of $690,000 to be returned.

A Mr K. Premmananth is asking for $503,000.

The State Courts riled in favour of the plaintiffs because no defence was filed.

Still, they could not get their money back.

The couple have disappeared.
http://therealsingapore.com/content/couple-ran-away-after-taking-4-million-49-people-investments
 
Loanshark eat its shareholders...serve all these people rite! :)
 
San Tee Credit's law firm, M. Nedumaran & Co, then sent a letter to the investors in 2013 to say that the company was "revamping the nature of business" and could thus not give the money back to the investors.

But in March last year, Mr M. Nedumaran then wrote again to some of the investors and said that San Tee Credit's money could still not be taken out of the Philippines.

Would the lawyer get into trouble ? To a layman, the swindler is more believable when you have a law firm to write letters on his behalf.
 
黑吃黑。two indians will cancel each other out, te cobra slithers out alive...

Cactus%20Cobra%20Mascot_GIF.jpg
 
some parallel with CPF?!

cling2.jpg


Man explains why he had "no choice" but to cling onto moving car at Jalan Jurong Kechil
Posted on 24 October 2014
Zaihan Mohamed Yusof
The New Paper
Wednesday, 22 October, 2014

It may look like a scene from a movie, but what happened to Mr Haresh Govindaraju was no stunt.

It was the most terrifying ride of his life as he clung to a moving car, slumped against the windscreen and bonnet, for about 5km.

His arms were spread across the windscreen so his hands could grip the metal frames — each barely 3cm wide — at the edge of the windscreen.

Mr Haresh, a 47-year-old technician, told The New Paper yesterday: “I didn’t dare move as I clung to the front of the car. The lines on the road were a blur.

“I held on as tightly as I could. I was so terrified that I would end up being run over by the car if I lost my grip.”

His ride of terror last Saturday evening had started at King Albert Park in Bukit Timah and ended at a neighbourhood police post at Bukit Batok East Avenue 6, roughly 5km away.

It was captured on video and the clip was later posted on citizen journalism website Stomp.

Mr Haresh and two friends had staked out a condominium at King Albert Park that day for a man who allegedly owed them money over an investment deal that had turned sour.

The man is believed to be a manager in a credit company, who had become uncontactable more than six months ago.

TIP-OFF

Mr Haresh’s friend had received a tip-off that the manager and his family were living in the condo.

At around 6pm, the trio spotted the manager driving into the condo.

They went to intercept the driver but when he saw them, he tried to drive out of the condo.

Mr Haresh said he stood in front of the moving car to block it from leaving.

“I was confident he would stop. After all, we were childhood friends,” he said.

“The next thing I knew, I was hit and I found myself lying face-down on the car’s bonnet.”

Mr Haresh showed this reporter bruises on both his shins during the interview in his Hougang flat. He said the bruises were the result of him being hit by the car’s front bumper.

He added that the car kept moving while he was on the bonnet, so he had no choice but to hang on for dear life.

As the car drove away, it barely missed a white car that was entering the condo, he said.

Mr Haresh also claimed that the driver tried to dislodge him from the car by swerving, braking and even turning on the windscreen wipers.

“I could feel the windscreen blades rubbing against my body,” he said.

He started panicking when the car went onto the busy Upper Bukit Timah Road and then turned left to Jalan Jurong Kechil.

Though he had no idea of the car’s speed, it felt fast to him as the wind buffeted his body.

Couldn’t he have got off the car when the car slowed down?

“I saw the female passenger gesturing to me to get off the bonnet but I didn’t dare move because I couldn’t gamble that he would stop safely. What if he had accelerated when I tried to get off?” said Mr Haresh.

Somewhere along Jalan Jurong Kechil, the drama was captured on video by someone in a passing car. Mr Haresh said he had no idea he was being filmed.

“I had no time to look at the surroundings or figure out where he was taking me to,” he said.

“I only noticed the things happening to me. Every time he jammed on the brakes, I started to slide down the bonnet. When that happened, I desperately held on to the windscreen wipers.

“When he accelerated, I was pushed up against the windscreen.”

The video clip on Stomp showed the car’s brake lights coming on and off abruptly.

Mr Haresh said he shouted at the driver in Tamil, asking if he really wanted to kill him. But he was unsure if he could be heard from inside the car as it was windy outside.

At one point, when the car slowed down to a crawl, a man went to him and said in Malay: “Mati, mati, abang. Turun, abang.” (“You’ll die, brother. Get down, brother.”)

Mr Haresh said that particular encounter was hazy. All he remembers saying to the man was, “Write down the car’s licence plate number.”

When the car stopped, Mr Haresh found himself at the front of the neighbourhood police post in Bukit Batok East Avenue 6.

ATTENTION

The driver honked to get the attention of the police as Mr Haresh stubbornly clung on to the car, as he did not want the driver to flee.

When an officer asked him to get off the bonnet, he did so only after the female passenger agreed to alight and enter the police post with him to give her statement.

The driver drove off after that, said Mr Haresh.

The police said they had “established a case of rash act had occurred”.

A police spokesman told TNP that two men had been arrested and were later offered police bail.

TNP understands that the driver is being investigated for the rash act.

Mr Haresh said: “Netizens are saying that I’m crazy or a joker to jump on the bonnet.

“The truth is, I’m no hero. Nobody in his right mind would want to be in my situation. I had no choice.”
 
Back
Top