AGO: Nparks had no system to track assets. WTF? More PAP meritocracy?

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
24,043
Points
113
No System to Track Assets

During the audit of the project for the development of the Gardens by the Bay,
AGO observed that NParks did not have a system to monitor and recover money due
from its consultants and contractors for the procurement of information management
services. NParks also did not have a system to track the location of its high value
landscaping materials and plants located at the Gardens by the Bay. For proper
management and accountability of public funds, it is important for NParks to put in
place a system to track its assets.


No System to Monitor and Recover Money Due from Consultants and
Contractors

NParks did not have a system to monitor and recover money due from its
consultants and contractors for the procurement of information management services.
The costs of the services were to be shared among NParks, its consultants and
contractors. NParks was not able to ascertain whether a total of $199,800, which
NParks had paid on behalf of its consultants and contractors three to five and a half years
earlier (as at June 2014), had been recovered from the relevant parties.

For proper management and accountability of public funds, it is important
for NParks to put in place a system to monitor and recover money due from its
consultants and contractors.

Part II: Audit of Statutory Boards
.
NParks informed AGO that it would put in place a system to track and recover
money due. It had also sought clarification from its consultants and contractors on
the outstanding amounts. All outstanding amounts have since been recovered.
 
no means no need to monitor lah... just like temashake. no system to track losses.
 
no means no need to monitor lah... just like temashake. no system to track losses.

People steal all their expensive plans and koala bears and they wouldn't know its gone.
 
Last year's report listed serious lapses.
They said they will do something about it.
This year, caught again.
They will do something about it again.
Promise?
 
These 'problems' is just a small potato because the well being of Singaporeans is primarily measured by the level of our minister's salary.

"If the annual salary of the Minister of Information, Communication and Arts is only $500,000, it may pose some problems when he discuss policies with media CEOs who earn millions of dollars because they need not listen to the minister's ideas and proposals. Hence, a reasonable payout will help to maintain a bit of dignity."
- MP Lim Wee Kiak apologises for comments on pay
YqUYU.jpg
[IMG URL]

ST23Mar2007-%2BWhy%2Bpay%2Bmust%2Bgo%2Bup.JPG
 
Well I guess, we need to increase pay of civil servants to make the cuntry a smart, lapses-proof one.
 
Back
Top