• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Aging Singapore – a business issue

SNAblog

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://csr-asia.com/weekly_detail.php?id=11912

Aging Singapore – a business issue
by Marie Morice, 13 Jan 2010

In my two years living in Singapore, I’ve had many opportunities to exchange with local taxi drivers. One of my first questions is always to find out how long they’ve been a cabbie for. It’s by no means statistical but I’ve noted that most of them are male, in their sixties (and sometimes seventies) who started in the taxi trade after being retrenched from their last job, as a result of the past or current economic downturns. For a lot of them, it seemed the best option as they were finding it hard to get new employment because of their age. Most of them are working to earn an income as they feel their existing personal savings, assets and Central Provident Fund (Singapore social security savings plan) are not sufficient to cover their financial needs.

This is an interesting anecdote, which reflects to some extent the emerging issue of an aging population in Singapore. A recent report from UBS (UBS’s Q-Series® reports on Asian Structural Themes, www.ubs.com) found that Singapore is set to be the world's third- fastest ageing nation, as the proportion of those aged 65 and above will double to 20 per cent in 2020. Singapore may suffer the most among Asian economies from an ageing population, with the average growth in economic output falling more than 40 per cent over the next 25 years.

This has major implications for Singapore as a country and for its businesses, especially in terms of impacts on overall economic output, investments, social welfare benefits for the elderly and human resources management policies.

v6wk2_mm_1.jpg


Overall population in Singapore has been steadily growing over the last few decades. Singapore’s total population as at end June 2009 was 4.99 million (Compared with a total of 227,592 persons as recorded in the 1901 Census). 3.73 million Singapore residents and 1.25 million non-residents. (www.singstat.gov.sg) were recorded.

v6wk2_mm_2.jpg


However, the annual growth rate of the population is dropping, as shown by the blue line (fertility rate) in the above graph. Factors such as a relatively low birth rate and high-quality health care, which helps people live longer, contribute to the ageing population.

In 1966, the government established the Family Planning and Population Board, which was responsible for providing clinical services and public education on family planning, along with policies and incentives intended to further reduce the birth rate. Fertility declined throughout the 1970s, reaching the replacement level of 1.006 in 1975, and thereafter declining below that level. By 1977, Singapore’s total fertility rate had dropped below replacement level, and has continued to stay below replacement level despite recent government efforts to increase fertility. (www.country-studies.com)

v6wk2_mm_3.jpg


As illustrated in the above graph, the overall decline in the proportion of people who are economically productive is becoming an increasing problem, in terms of economic growth. The UBS report estimated that this demographic change would slice 3 percentage points from long-term economic growth. In Singapore, the sharp reduction in labour growth could cause average GDP expansion to slow to 3.9 per cent between 2006 and 2030, down from 6.9 per cent from 1981 to 2005.

It might also become more difficult for Singapore to continue attracting investments as foreign investors might favour countries where more youthful and growing populations can support long-term growth, including India, Pakistan, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines.

Beyond economic growth and investment, the ageing of Singapore’s population is also likely to impact public finances, as the UBS report estimates that potential government support for the elderly through mandatory public pension plans cost the country more than 7 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP). This could have a direct impact in raising corporate and individual income tax, in to accommodate additional public spending for elderly support.

A recent publication by the Asian Meta Centre called “The Relationship between Formal and Familial Support of the Elderly in Singapore and Taiwan” (www.populationasia.org), examines the impact of aging on old age dependency ratio: “As a result of this rapid aging of Singapore’s population there will be a parallel increase in the old age dependency ratio. In 2000, approximately ten working age adults supported one older person. By 2030, only three working age adults will support one older person “

The paper concludes that the majority of older Singaporeans rely on private support (81% in 1999) and that the availability a CPF account (Singapore’s Central Provident Fund (CPF) was instituted in 1955 as a mechanism to provide Singaporeans with financial security in old age, a mandatory savings scheme for all employees and employers in Singapore) does not significantly affect older individual’s probability of switching away from family support.

An increase in the old age dependency ratio will create a “double burden” for working adults who will not only have to contribute to their own CPF but also support their aging family members – this increasing financial constraint could have a major influence on individuals when looking for a job.

Beyond mitigating recruitment and staff retention problems due to a shrinking labour force, businesses will also need to evolve as their workforces continue to age. Human resource management practices will need to be adapted to ensure the skill levels of older workers are continually updated and that discrimination is not condoned.

In 1999, the retirement age in Singapore was raised to 62 to encourage senior people to stay in the labour market longer. Wage systems were restructured to separate salary and tenure so that long tenure (and thus being older) was no longer closely associated. Re-education was encouraged, funded largely by government subsidy, and employers were encouraged to introduce flexible work arrangements and partial retirement options. (www.usq.edu.au)

The recent National Survey of Senior Citizens (MCDYS, 2005, www.mcys.gov.sg) found that 28.2% of senior citizens aged 55 and above are working, out of which 74% are employed, 24% self-employed and 2% work in a family business. So is this a trend that is here to stay? As yet, it is still too soon to evaluate the effectiveness of these initiatives. Taxi drivers are now allowed to drive until they’re 73 years old. What should be the limit to retiring age? Will limits eventually be replaced by simply an ‘ability to work’ criteria?

The greying of the population will most probably create new opportunities for business to meet the needs of this growing elderly community. The healthcare industry, special housing, trained professionals like nurses and social workers as well as life insurance and asset management firms should also get a boost from a growing need for wealth management for retirement.

Companies are increasingly investing in research on ageing issues so they can understand the new population dynamics and adapt accordingly. Yesterday, I was invited at an event organised by the Mistui Sumitomo Insurance Group (MSIG) in Singapore who was awarding research grants through their Foundation (The Mistui Sumitomo Insurance Welfare Foundation) on senior citizen welfare and traffic safety, topics of great relevance to MSIG’s core business in insurance. Reflecting on the event, partnerships between businesses and academics seemed like a good way forward to provide research leadership in ageing subjects, which is key to business preparedness.

Singapore’s National Research Foundation has issued a scenario-planning paper for Singapore in 2020 looking at some examples of technologies for an ageing society, ranging from robotics technology to bioengineering tools, highlighting a new potential market for Singapore as a “a world-class originator of innovative, aged-friendly technology, products and devices” (rita.nrf.gov.sg)

Since the city’s founding in 1819, the size and composition of Singapore's population has been determined by the interaction of migration and natural increase. Singapore’s population is the fastest aging in Southeast Asia. The proportion of the population aged 65 and above is expected to increase from the current 7% as of 2000 to 19% by 2030. This dramatic increase in the proportion of the aged in the population is a result of an extremely effective family planning policy introduced in the 1970s. With fertility below the replacement level, the population would after some fifty years begin to decline unless supplemented by immigration.

In 2007, the Singapore government announced that it was gearing up for 40 percent surge in population to 6.5 million from the current 4.5 million with urban redevelopment plans to accommodate its new population projection. (National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan – Straits Times). How the government will achieve this has generated many heated debates around immigration issues in the past few months which are not for discussion here but this seems to be unavoidable if Singapore wants to address this emerging challenge in the long term.
 

holyman

Alfrescian
Loyal
i prefer to see the cup as half full instead: "Aging Singapore-More business opportunities..." Why do you think maid agencies are doing so well? Cos its more humane and cheaper than putting one's age parents in a nursing home (or worse JB)...
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Thanks for the article.

Why is it that foreign journalists can put together a comprehensive report that has quality. The local version from the Toa Payoh brothel will start with a Minister opening a PAP kindergarden, a few lines of words of "wisdom", then disclosing a new initiative on the need to address the problem but never bothering to provide a comprehensive report of the problem.

Truly a nanny state where citizens are assumed to be kids and therefore should not be given the full picture.

When some academic decides to provide his views by publishing a full report with data, he will accused of using the wrong data, not having the full picture and the air will turn to one of treason and treachery. Latest being the report on jobs going to foreigners where Lim Chong Yah first announced the findings on behalf of his staff presumably to grab glory and disappearing when the first howizter broadside landed. After few days, the 2 authors surrendered at a press conference with no Lim Chong Yah in sight. Lesson in leadership, resolve, strength of character, and anatomy session in spine and its limitations.
 

littlefish

Alfrescian
Loyal
Thanks for the article.

Why is it that foreign journalists can put together a comprehensive report that has quality. The local version from the Toa Payoh brothel will start with a Minister opening a PAP kindergarden, a few lines of words of "wisdom", then disclosing a new initiative on the need to address the problem but never bothering to provide a comprehensive report of the problem.

Truly a nanny state where citizens are assumed to be kids and therefore should not be given the full picture.

When some academic decides to provide his views by publishing a full report with data, he will accused of using the wrong data, not having the full picture and the air will turn to one of treason and treachery. Latest being the report on jobs going to foreigners where Lim Chong Yah first announced the findings on behalf of his staff presumably to grab glory and disappearing when the first howizter broadside landed. After few days, the 2 authors surrendered at a press conference with no Lim Chong Yah in sight. Lesson in leadership, resolve, strength of character, and anatomy session in spine and its limitations.

That is because people will start asking questions about why we have such a rapidly aging population.

No thanks to the PAP policy of trying to get as many people as possible into the workforce and reducing the number of births. They set up policies to degrade the work done by housewives by allowing cheap foreign maids to take their place and put up disincentives for people having more than 2 children in the past.

The government has been fully focused on achieving economic growth to the exclusion of all other concerns. The people certainly got the government they wanted. If the people do not want other issues taking a backseat to economic growth, they will need to ensure that they have got the government's listening ear.
 

newyorker88

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is no wonder that many choose to retire else where. PAP knows that, so they plan ahead to bring in more FTs to replace singkees who migrate away, bring their CPF along. That is why they force people to sign up for some shitty CPF life crap.

For many who are too tired after a long day work, they will not have the time to sit down to think properly the future they going to have. And that is the plan of PAP.

THese people got all the time to sit down, collect fat pay and think of more ways to sqeeze more money from others.
 

Glaringly

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
This is a typical rubbish article that try to paint us into a corner and condition us to accept the need to increase our current population base to support an aging population. BS. ( Although it does not comes from our rubbish time )

First and foremost, it is a poorly constructed article with half truth facts all over the place to confuse the reader. It started off to insinuate that problems will start to show up as early as year 2020 due to the doubling of our aging population? Is she aware that our baby boomer's started from around year 1955 to 1965?

Taking a close look at the 2 graphs on population growth and fertility rate, does it really adds up? There is a 2.5 million increase from 1990 to 2008 ( majority are due to increase in PR ) and where is the fertility rate from this period cooked from? Does it include these 2.5 aliens?

It went on the highlight that we have 10 working adults supporting 1 age person?? And we have a acute problem if it drops to 3 adults supporting 1? If you sit down and think about it, this is not a Singapore problem, it very much affects almost all developed countries. Why 10 to 1, that is because of the war and the post war baby boom. And in today's replacing rate across much of the developed world, the ratio would most likely be 3 or 4 to 1.

May I remind you, the baby boomer enjoy the best period of our country progress. We are the one...

1. Purchase HDB at relatively low cost, 60,000 for 4 rm, 80,000 for 5 rm. etc...
2. Enjoy 40% CPF contribution
3. Enjoy the most successfully run of the country economy 1970 - 2000

Unless this government is going to side line us, the baby boomer and force us into early retirement, I think the line that said in year 2030 there will be 3 working adults supporting 1 age person is totally and categorically untruth.

Because us, the baby boomer will be relatively self sufficient not only to see us through our retirement, many of us are capable of further supporting our children and grand children!
 

bryanlim1972

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is no wonder that many choose to retire else where. PAP knows that, so they plan ahead to bring in more FTs to replace singkees who migrate away, bring their CPF along. That is why they force people to sign up for some shitty CPF life crap.

For many who are too tired after a long day work, they will not have the time to sit down to think properly the future they going to have. And that is the plan of PAP.

THese people got all the time to sit down, collect fat pay and think of more ways to sqeeze more money from others.

getting singaporeans to retire overseas is an effective solution to the problem of an aging population
 

annexa

Alfrescian
Loyal
Factors such as a relatively low birth rate and high-quality health care, which helps people live longer, contribute to the ageing population.

So which part of this statement you want our gahmen, ministars, scholars to lead us into? :biggrin:
 

kiwibird7

Alfrescian
Loyal
The problem is SINGAPORE LAND is finite and too small to sustain any population growth indefinitely for the sole purpose of having say 10 young people to support 1 old folk.

Eventually the 10 young people themselves will grow old requiring even a GREATER number of eg 100 younger people to support the 10 old folks; the cycle soon repeats very quickly.

Worse yet, with improved nutrition, healthcare etc life expectancy is increased leading to more old people not dying anytime soon.

Singapore should rightfully keep their population small to remain self sufficient and to keep infrastructure development & maintenance costs low with regards to water, power, schools, hospitals transportation etc

Make it simple, cheap and stress free. Everyone grows their own food (farms) to be self sufficient, there is need to spend money on expensive education like University etc, buy cars, build more houses as grown up children stay at the farm to take over the farm when their parents grow old.
 

Dmode101

Alfrescian
Loyal
The problem is SINGAPORE LAND is finite and too small to sustain any population growth indefinitely for the sole purpose of having say 10 young people to support 1 old folk.

Eventually the 10 young people themselves will grow old requiring even a GREATER number of eg 100 younger people to support the 10 old folks; the cycle soon repeats very quickly.

Worse yet, with improved nutrition, healthcare etc life expectancy is increased leading to more old people not dying anytime soon.

Singapore should rightfully keep their population small to remain self sufficient and to keep infrastructure development & maintenance costs low with regards to water, power, schools, hospitals transportation etc

Make it simple, cheap and stress free. Everyone grows their own food (farms) to be self sufficient, there is need to spend money on expensive education like University etc, buy cars, build more houses as grown up children stay at the farm to take over the farm when their parents grow old.

best solution there is. Ive thought hard about it and it has always been the same. agriculture has always been the most important part of living. the ruling ppl has pulled the wool over our eyes with land scarcity shit reason.

common the vast lands at lim chu kang used for military and some crap cemetary. who are we kidding. and farming is rewarding.with machinery technology. its not anywhere near back breaking. At least we run our own lives and the rich pppl can fuck off our lives and site.

Taking away our land was the biggest evil the govt has done and I will avenge it one day - My kampung was burnt down and the land forced to sell.
 
Top