• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Activists hand over petition on Gopalan Nair to US embassy

NgEjay

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Written by Ng E-Jay
17 Sept 2008


Today, five activists handed a petition to the US embassy calling on the embassy to render Mr Gopalan Nair more assistance and work with the local authorities to expedite his request to return to the US to take care of his financial affairs and his law practice which has been adversely affected during his absence.

However, Mr Nair’s request to return to the US must now be put on hold, as will be explained later.

Local activists Seelan Palay, Chong Kai Xiong, Muhd Khalis, Rachel Zeng and Ng E-Jay were met by US embassy staff Mr Learned Dees and Mr Aruna Amirthanayagam near the front gate of the embassy at around 2.30pm. They handed the petition to the officials and took a group photo.
The petition had garnered a total of 89 signatures, including signatures from Malaysian, Burmese and American supporters.

The activists emphasized that the petition was meant as a show of solidarity from members of the public, to which Mr Dees replied, “We will accept it as such.”

Today at around 5pm, Judge Kan Ting Chiu passed a 3 month jail sentence on Mr Gopalan Nair for insulting Judge Belinda Ang in a blog posting. Mr Nair is slated to begin his jail sentence on Saturday, 20 Sept. He will be appealing this sentence.

The case of allegedly insulting Justice Lai Siu Chiu in an email sent in 2006 has been stood down.

Since Mr Nair has been sentenced to jail, the earliest possible date he can return to the US is after his jail sentence. We hope at that time, the US embassy can continue working with local authorities to expedite his return.

Mr Nair was previously been fined $3,000 for using abusive words towards police officers and disorderly behaviour at the junction of Bukit Timah Road and Race Course Road on July 4. He considered appealing against the conviction, but has since dropped his appeal.

The full text of the petition to the US embassy is as follows:
On 31 May 2008, Mr Gopalan Pallichadath Nair, a US citizen, was arrested at Broadway Hotel in Singapore while on vacation and charged with using insulting words towards High Court Judge Belinda Ang in an e-mail criticising her handling of a case. Justice Ang was presiding over a hearing to assess damages in a defamation suit that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew won against the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), its Secretary-General Chee Soon Juan and his sister Chee Siok Chin.

Mr Nair was remanded for one week at the Central Police Division to assist in investigations. His passport was also impounded.

On 5 June 2008, Mr Nair was released from custody, but his passport was not returned to him despite appeals from his lawyer. To this day, Mr Nair is unable to return to the US. His legal practice in Fremont California near San Francisco has been left in limbo and his finances have greatly suffered. Mr Nair’s home mortgage in the US is also in jeopardy and the possibility of his having to declare bankruptcy increases the longer he has to remain in Singapore.

Mr Nair vehemently denied sending any emails. His charge was subsequently amended to one of insulting Judge Belinda Ang in his blog post. In the days ahead, further charges were tendered against him: one of sending an insulting email to High Court Judge Lai Siu Chiu in 2006 while she was presiding over a contempt of court case involving SDP chief Chee Soon Juan, and one of disorderly behaviour in public and use of abusive language against police officers.

Mr Nair’s appeals to have his passport returned and for him to be allowed to go back to the US to attend to his personal finances and other matters have been repeatedly denied. This is despite the fact that he has posted a significant bail amount of several thousand dollars and has shown his willingness to cooperate with the authorities. Given that he is likely to have to remain in Singapore for a few more months to attend his various trials, granting Mr Nair’s request for a trip back home in the interim period is not only reasonable, but humane.

On behalf of Mr Nair, we appeal to the US embassy to work with the Singapore authorities to grant his request as soon as possible.
 
A

Alu862

Guest
Granted that he may not have insulted a judge, he writes even more ludicrous stuff such as PRCs in Singapore are spies and that Singapore has not economically progress./ is not an international city.
 

Areopagus

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think that many right thinking Singaporeans are shocked by the news. Thanks for standing up for Gopalan
 

zack123

Alfrescian
Loyal
1) If Nair is already a US citizen, why is he so hard up on further criticizing Singapore?

2) Shouldn't he be focussing more of his time on improving the problems back in his new hometown where I believe have their own share of problems?

3) Who elected him to represent the countries which do not adopt US style of democracy?

4) Or is he using US citizenship as a shield against possible backlash to his retorts?
 
A

Alu862

Guest
1) If Nair is already a US citizen, why is he so hard up on further criticizing Singapore?

2) Shouldn't he be focussing more of his time on improving the problems back in his new hometown where I believe have their own share of problems?

3) Who elected him to represent the countries which do not adopt US style of democracy?

4) Or is he using US citizenship as a shield against possible backlash to his retorts?

He has not done anything to prove himself American. He is just using the citizenship for a shield which failed. The US cared for Michael Fay, a true blue born American, while they don't give two hoots for this fake American who calls all PRCs spies and agents of communism. So he may not have insulted a judge. but he did ask to be arrested on his blog. He got his wish. Prison is a good change for him unless he calls all inamtes spies.
 

Avantas

Alfrescian
Loyal
Did any of those TOC chaps join you ?


Written by Ng E-Jay
17 Sept 2008


Today, five activists handed a petition to the US embassy calling on the embassy to render Mr Gopalan Nair more assistance and work with the local authorities to expedite his request to return to the US to take care of his financial affairs and his law practice which has been adversely affected during his absence.

However, Mr Nair’s request to return to the US must now be put on hold, as will be explained later.

Local activists Seelan Palay, Chong Kai Xiong, Muhd Khalis, Rachel Zeng and Ng E-Jay were met by US embassy staff Mr Learned Dees and Mr Aruna Amirthanayagam near the front gate of the embassy at around 2.30pm. They handed the petition to the officials and took a group photo.
The petition had garnered a total of 89 signatures, including signatures from Malaysian, Burmese and American supporters.

The activists emphasized that the petition was meant as a show of solidarity from members of the public, to which Mr Dees replied, “We will accept it as such.”

Today at around 5pm, Judge Kan Ting Chiu passed a 3 month jail sentence on Mr Gopalan Nair for insulting Judge Belinda Ang in a blog posting. Mr Nair is slated to begin his jail sentence on Saturday, 20 Sept. He will be appealing this sentence.

The case of allegedly insulting Justice Lai Siu Chiu in an email sent in 2006 has been stood down.

Since Mr Nair has been sentenced to jail, the earliest possible date he can return to the US is after his jail sentence. We hope at that time, the US embassy can continue working with local authorities to expedite his return.

Mr Nair was previously been fined $3,000 for using abusive words towards police officers and disorderly behaviour at the junction of Bukit Timah Road and Race Course Road on July 4. He considered appealing against the conviction, but has since dropped his appeal.

The full text of the petition to the US embassy is as follows:
On 31 May 2008, Mr Gopalan Pallichadath Nair, a US citizen, was arrested at Broadway Hotel in Singapore while on vacation and charged with using insulting words towards High Court Judge Belinda Ang in an e-mail criticising her handling of a case. Justice Ang was presiding over a hearing to assess damages in a defamation suit that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew won against the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), its Secretary-General Chee Soon Juan and his sister Chee Siok Chin.

Mr Nair was remanded for one week at the Central Police Division to assist in investigations. His passport was also impounded.

On 5 June 2008, Mr Nair was released from custody, but his passport was not returned to him despite appeals from his lawyer. To this day, Mr Nair is unable to return to the US. His legal practice in Fremont California near San Francisco has been left in limbo and his finances have greatly suffered. Mr Nair’s home mortgage in the US is also in jeopardy and the possibility of his having to declare bankruptcy increases the longer he has to remain in Singapore.

Mr Nair vehemently denied sending any emails. His charge was subsequently amended to one of insulting Judge Belinda Ang in his blog post. In the days ahead, further charges were tendered against him: one of sending an insulting email to High Court Judge Lai Siu Chiu in 2006 while she was presiding over a contempt of court case involving SDP chief Chee Soon Juan, and one of disorderly behaviour in public and use of abusive language against police officers.

Mr Nair’s appeals to have his passport returned and for him to be allowed to go back to the US to attend to his personal finances and other matters have been repeatedly denied. This is despite the fact that he has posted a significant bail amount of several thousand dollars and has shown his willingness to cooperate with the authorities. Given that he is likely to have to remain in Singapore for a few more months to attend his various trials, granting Mr Nair’s request for a trip back home in the interim period is not only reasonable, but humane.

On behalf of Mr Nair, we appeal to the US embassy to work with the Singapore authorities to grant his request as soon as possible.
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
incident happened in sgp, why didn't mention about the number of local signatures instead?

by the way, what and why do foreigners have a say in our own local matters? is it really a wise move to involved foreigners intrusion into our local domestic matters? what's the motive?
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
maybe we should intiate a petition that ILLEEGAL PARKING SUMMONS to be officially waived especially if vehicles belonging to sdp or their supporters.:wink:
 
A

Alu862

Guest
incident happened in sgp, why didn't mention about the number of local signatures instead?

by the way, what and why do foreigners have a say in our own local matters? is it really a wise move to involved foreigners intrusion into our local domestic matters? what's the motive?

It's not so much about foreigners having a say in our matters; it about supporting who the person is. Gopalan Nair is a lunatic radical with such claims that PRCs abroad especially in Singapore are spies and agents of communism, that Singapore in not an international city. Who is he? Is he an American? What loyalty does he have to his "country" or is he using it as merely a shield? If so, you can then understand why there was intervention for Michael Fay (a proper American who only broke the law in SG once) and no intervention for this so called American.
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
It's not so much about foreigners having a say in our matters; it about supporting who the person is. Gopalan Nair is a lunatic radical with such claims that PRCs abroad especially in Singapore are spies and agents of communism, that Singapore in not an international city. Who is he? Is he an American? What loyalty does he have to his "country" or is he using it as merely a shield? If so, you can then understand why there was intervention for Michael Fay (a proper American who only broke the law in SG once) and no intervention for this so called American.

to some, he's a heroic figure - one who dares go against the system, the gabramen and even the law of the land.

to me, he'a just a friendly bloke.

if he broke the law, he faced the law. does it mean that if he's acquitted and dropped of all the charges, those people would shower praises on our gabramen?

so who runs the law? ngejay or the sgp court?
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
i hate to use this example but couldn't find a better one.
just like his good pal, lamei. she parked illegally, was booked with summons issued. yet she protested to make it like "whatever illegal could be overturned into legal" for her part.

if everyone follows suit that any illegal actions could be frivolously made it to be legal, then why need the law in the first place? and if convicting the offender is deemed with intention to muffled up "opp voice", "human rights" or all the nonsense, then it's like bending the law to one's convenience.

if the person charged wasn't gopalan with links to SDP or their supporters, would they still be so excited to petition?

gopalan is a friendly bloke. he might have serious personal problems which resulted in his undesirable behaviour. very few will divulge their problems. instead they would camouflage it with another irrelevant problem.

but the law is the law. it's blind to all those whatever problems u can think of and use it as an excuse.

you break the law, then be prepared to suffer the consequence. it's that simple. why are these people complicating it? to camouflage their own secretive motive??
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
involving of foreigners into our local affairs is already questionable.

it's like getting my li'l brother LTS to be involved in their domestic affair. if they do not like that, why should they like this now?:confused:
 
A

Alu862

Guest
Gopalan abuses the right of freedom of speech with his "PRCs are spies" and other stupid comments. He thinks himself to be the leader of pro democracy for Singaporeans whne his site is only less sensational that even FHM's
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
the people who supported lawlessness or disrespect for the law using a fake forefront of "human rights" and "democracy" as a shield are the true dangerous shady fractions of a nation.

they can do a flash poll and gather random public opinions and see how many approve or agree with their warped thinking.
 

guavatree

Alfrescian
Loyal
the people who supported lawlessness or disrespect for the law using a fake forefront of "human rights" and "democracy" as a shield are the true dangerous shady fractions of a nation.


Gay indecent acts:

Penal Code Section 377A states, “Any male person who, in public or private, commits, or abets the commission of, or procures or attempts to procure the commission by any male person of, any act of gross indecency with another male person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years.”

Cheating:

Whoever, by deceiving any person, fraudulently or dishonestly induces the person so deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to consent that any person shall retain any property, or intentionally induces the person so deceived to do or omit to do anything which he or she would not do or omit if he or she were not so deceived, and which act or omission causes or is likely to cause damage or harm to that person in body, mind, reputation or property, is said to "cheat". For example, A cheats if he intentionally deceives Z into a belief that A means to repay any money that Z may lend to him when A does not intend to repay it, and thereby dishonestly induces Z to lend him money. Cheating is punished with imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine, or both.

Father bashing:

Voluntarily causing hurt – A person causes hurt when he or she causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person. Whoever does any act with the intention of causing hurt to any person, or with the knowledge that he is likely to cause hurt to any person, and does cause hurt to any person, voluntarily causes hurt. The penalty for voluntarily causing hurt is imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine of up to S$1,000, or both.

Theft of Temple Funds:

Theft is committed when a person, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property in order to effect the taking. The penalty for theft is imprisonment of up to three years, or a fine, or both. It is more common, however, for offenders to be charged with committing theft in a building, tent or vessel, which is used as a human dwelling, or for the custody of property. The penalty for this more serious offense is imprisonment of up to seven years, and also a fine.
 

guavatree

Alfrescian
Loyal
you break the law, then be prepared to suffer the consequence. it's that simple. why are these people complicating it? to camouflage their own secretive motive??



chao ah kwa father basher temple thief

handphone thief property con

even laukwayboos are not spared from your conning.

you cheapskate retard even con them for meals.

you lowlife unemployed moron hides your filthy deeds and hypocrisy behind Buddhism!
 

guavatree

Alfrescian
Loyal
maybe we should intiate a petition that ILLEEGAL PARKING SUMMONS to be officially waived especially if vehicles belonging to sdp or their supporters.:wink:

go get a job and stop wasting your time being a fucking kaypohji!

your appalling gay behavior is worse than a menopause woman!

did you had your menses lately chao ah kwa?

LOL
 

guavatree

Alfrescian
Loyal
involving of foreigners into our local affairs is already questionable. it's like getting my li'l brother LTS to be involved in their domestic affair. if they do not like that, why should they like this now?:confused:

you're always a fucking chao ah kwa kaypohji!

fucking hypocrite!
 

guavatree

Alfrescian
Loyal
to some, he's a heroic figure - one who dares go against the system, the gabramen and even the law of the land.

bo lumpar dared not pick up phone call

got to ask your old mama to do it for you

then ran and hide under your old mama's skirt and lau sai!

you got someone knock at your bedroom window you ran and hide

under your old mama's skirt also!

bo lumpar you ask your old mama to dial mata chu

choa ah kwa bo lumpar ... LOL
 
Top