- Joined
- Mar 12, 2009
- Messages
- 13,160
- Points
- 0
CONVICTED (From left, leaving court after proceedings earlier last month)
Central executive committee member Chee Siok Chin
Assistant secretary-general John Tan
Supporter Chong Kai Xiong
Chairman Gandhi Ambalam
-- ST PHOTO: KEVIN LIM
View more photos
A HIGH Court judge on Thursday overturned a district judge's acquittal of five opposition figures for taking part in an illegal street procession in 2007.
Justice Choo Han Teck ordered District Judge John Ng, who acquitted the five leaders and supporters of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) last October, to record the conviction and to hear their mitigation for sentencing at a later date.
The Government appealed against the acquittal of the five, who had been charged with taking part in an illegal procession.
They had walked without a valid permit from Hong Lim Park to the Queenstown Remand Prison on Sept 16, 2007.
In his October judgment, Judge Ng, referring to dictionary definitions of the word, argued that he did not consider what they had done a 'procession'.
He noted that the SDP five had walked mainly on pedestrian pathways, made ad hoc stops for toilet breaks, and walked 'casually', sometimes singly or in pairs.
Central executive committee member Chee Siok Chin
Assistant secretary-general John Tan
Supporter Chong Kai Xiong
Chairman Gandhi Ambalam

-- ST PHOTO: KEVIN LIM
View more photos
A HIGH Court judge on Thursday overturned a district judge's acquittal of five opposition figures for taking part in an illegal street procession in 2007.
Justice Choo Han Teck ordered District Judge John Ng, who acquitted the five leaders and supporters of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) last October, to record the conviction and to hear their mitigation for sentencing at a later date.
The Government appealed against the acquittal of the five, who had been charged with taking part in an illegal procession.
They had walked without a valid permit from Hong Lim Park to the Queenstown Remand Prison on Sept 16, 2007.
In his October judgment, Judge Ng, referring to dictionary definitions of the word, argued that he did not consider what they had done a 'procession'.
He noted that the SDP five had walked mainly on pedestrian pathways, made ad hoc stops for toilet breaks, and walked 'casually', sometimes singly or in pairs.