A friend of mine told me that the bookie odds seems to be a plot.

hbk75

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
2,363
Points
113
By showing the odds that oppositions are going to win too many seats. Causing a massive swing towards the pap. I would say that it is a smart strategy if it's true.
 
By showing the odds that oppositions are going to win too many seats. Causing a massive swing towards the pap.
Or it could be the other way round, i.e. the bookies were confident PAP would win, so they tried to TRICK as many OVERCONFIDENT opposition supporters as possible into betting on East Coast, Fengshan, etc.
 
maybe there are no bookies taking the bets at all. all these are self created odds from you know who?
 
maybe there are no bookies taking the bets at all. all these are self created odds from you know who?

Let me ask you...have you ever seen bookies giving predictions up to two decimal points?
 
Let me ask you...have you ever seen bookies giving predictions up to two decimal points?

If your bookie is Marjo, he even gives u margin of error. But this cheebyes predictions are way off. His margin of error should be +- 30
 
yep. there were some pro-pap chaps here that suddenly switch side and i was wondering why. now i know.
 
By showing the odds that oppositions are going to win too many seats. Causing a massive swing towards the pap. I would say that it is a smart strategy if it's true.


You could be right. But then again, if Sinkies are so dumbfuck as to VOTE OUT OF FEAR simply because of some odds touted by anonymous bookies online, then they deserve to the govt they voted for.

Voting out of stupidity is the mark of an imbecile.
 
Back
Top