72% Serangoon Gdn Against PAPee Now!

72% having a difference of opinion with the PAP does not represent 72% opposing the PAP. That would be a hyperbole. People in daily life have differences of opinion with one another but vitriolic hate is usually rare, except perhaps in this forum. But this forum perhaps serves the purpose of relieving pent up stress and some monikers seek mental reempowerment from the powerlessness to manage their own life in the real world. This is alright, so long as seditious and social damaging acts are not enacted in the real physical domain.

Whatever....juz glad that residents of SG are welcoming the FTs :D
 
so what if the new road to SGT is by AMK 1.

the bangalas will still go to the park near the church, hang around at chomp homp, and crowd the NTUC, and scare away customers at night.
The pubs opposite the bus-stop will kaput.

How? Climb over the fence ah? Or take a cab from AMK Ave 1?

Stop behavling like the MONGREL who bit his masters' hands LOUDHAILER chee soon juan.
 
How? Climb over the fence ah? Or take a cab from AMK Ave 1?

Stop behavling like the MONGREL who bit his masters' hands LOUDHAILER chee soon juan.

Cannot cut a hole through the fence meh? Why are running dogs so uncreative one?
 
suction-hose-A-big.jpg
To please both Serangoon Gardens and AMK residents, Mabroky can install a huge suction pump that will suck up all the 1000 blanglas and spit them out in Little India. No need to build a road out of the dormitories.
 
Life is too good here to have pent up stress right. :)

72% having a difference of opinion with the PAP does not represent 72% opposing the PAP. That would be a hyperbole. People in daily life have differences of opinion with one another but vitriolic hate is usually rare, except perhaps in this forum. But this forum perhaps serves the purpose of relieving pent up stress and some monikers seek mental reempowerment from the powerlessness to manage their own life in the real world. This is alright, so long as seditious and social damaging acts are not enacted in the real physical domain.
 
this is only an issue that affect their daily lifestyle,so they are against it.
but it does not equal to vote against PAP as bro DIVSION1 has pointed out.

do you think that they will risk reducing the value of their property by voting against the PAP in the next election. i do not think so.
 
Back
Top