- Joined
- Sep 6, 2010
- Messages
- 3,985
- Points
- 0
why are you comparing past and present???
can Pele or Eusebio or George Best generate the kind of revenue and cable viewership that beckham?
not just beckham but mario ballotelli, messi and cristiano ronaldo also can ???
technological changes allow the best performers in a given field to serve a bigger market and thus reap a greater share of its revenue. ....
go read this paper "The Economics of Superstars” http://www.jstor.org/pss/1803469
and this book saving "capitalism from the capitalists" http://www.amazon.com/Saving-Capitalism-Capitalists-Unleashing-Opportunity/dp/0609610708
this is also a good book ... Tim Harford's The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor--and Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!
http://www.amazon.com/Undercover-Economist-Exposing-Poor-Decent/dp/0195189779
You believe that reading those books will reveal and give answers to solve the current problems of the runaway effects of capitalism? Why?
Comparing the past to the present is because from there we can understand, without reading tons of books that will take a lifetime to go through, and still cannot get a clue as to what are the problems that beset the world. Like the extinct deer specie that has antlers that grew and grew, one day the antlers grew too large that the head cannot support it leading to the demise of that species. And so with capitalism and the greed that will unbalanced the world economy, not only the politics of envy that you so fondly like to quote. Why do you think there are so many nations now in deep shit and you still believe that what you expound is the best model, i.e. to repress the poor until they revolt?