Serves the brat right. He got off too lightly in my opinion. Decapitation would have been a far better outcome.
![]()
Waiting for the parent of the boy to sue Westgate off..
lianbeng replies: the management can sue the boy's parents for letting the boy spoil the door ah!who sue who now?
The management should sue the parent and claim for damage because there is nothing wrong with the glass door. In fact it has proven that the safety feature of the laminated tempered glass door averted serious injury to the boy,
Such swing doors are hinged to the top and bottom of the door frame by 2 pivots. The boy bashed the door against the wall causing the glass to shatter. The laminations held the shattered glass pieces together but it is no longer a rigid panel. Instead it becomes like a flexible rubber sheet, causing the pivots to dislodge from the frame. The flexibility causes the centre of gravity to change as the door bend, preventing the full weight of the glass from landing on the boy or he would be crushed as that door can weigh more than 100 kg.
Yes, in the past, such doors came with a metal frame which would prevent such a mishap as the frame will remain rigid even when the glass shattered. Architects don't like it as the frame was considered to be not aesthetic. So, with improved material design, all glass doors become frameless and it has been so for easily 20 over years. If we look at the rate of door shattering, it is really quite rare. Hence, it is fair to say that frameless glass door can actually take reasonable abuse under normal circumstances. If I am not wrong, there is also a damping mechanism at the pivots, preventing the door from "over swinging". Once being swing pass a certain angle, the door will be locked in the open position. This is what workers do when they need to transport goods. In this incident, the abuse is really extreme as the boy capitalized on the momentum of the swinging door by running with the moving door and slamming it against the wall. It is not a "normal abuse" which is why I strongly felt that the parent should be made to pay for the damage.?....Nevertheless public doors must be able to take some abuse. Poor construction standards unfortunately.
Wow! the door cannot stand the weight of 4-years old boy and the swing force.A Westgate Mall spokesperson later told the media that the door had broken becuase the young boy had swung it open too far causing the door to hit against the frame and shatter.
Yes, in the past, such doors came with a metal frame which would prevent such a mishap as the frame will remain rigid even when the glass shattered. Architects don't like it as the frame was considered to be not aesthetic. So, with improved material design, all glass doors become frameless and it has been so for easily 20 over years. If we look at the rate of door shattering, it is really quite rare. Hence, it is fair to say that frameless glass door can actually take reasonable abuse under normal circumstances. If I am not wrong, there is also a damping mechanism at the pivots, preventing the door from "over swinging". Once being swing pass a certain angle, the door will be locked in the open position. This is what workers do when they need to transport goods. In this incident, the abuse is really extreme as the boy capitalized on the momentum of the swinging door by running with the moving door and slamming it against the wall. It is not a "normal abuse" which is why I strongly felt that the parent should be made to pay for the damage.
The management should sue the parent and claim for damage because there is nothing wrong with the glass door. In fact it has proven that the safety feature of the laminated tempered glass door averted serious injury to the boy,
Such swing doors are hinged to the top and bottom of the door frame by 2 pivots. The boy bashed the door against the wall causing the glass to shatter. The laminations held the shattered glass pieces together but it is no longer a rigid panel. Instead it becomes like a flexible rubber sheet, causing the pivots to dislodge from the frame. The flexibility causes the centre of gravity to change as the door bend, preventing the full weight of the glass from landing on the boy or he would be crushed as that door can weigh more than 100 kg.
Glass is brittle. It will shatter easily if a "point" force hit it. So a door stopper will cause a "point force" when a swinging glass door hit it and the chance of shattering is great.If the door hinge/ floor hinge and the frame cannot stand for the weight of 4-years old boy and the wing force, I could say it material and built method were not up to the acceptable standards.
To prevent the over-swing or beyond the allowable angle of the floor hinge, the builder should fit the door stopper at appropriate point.
Must be prc kid