• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

3-year suspension for Susan Lim, rules SMC

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
28,603
Points
113
By K.C. Vijayan

THE Singapore Medical Council has ruled that renowned surgeon Susan Lim be suspended from practising for three years.

She is also to be fined $10,000 in a case involving overcharging a member of the Brunei royal family. She will also be censured in writing and must undertake not to overcharge again.

Dr Lim, 57, is appealing against the punishment, which was revealed in appeal papers she filed in the High Court last week.

The punishment is believed to be among the most severe meted out to an errant doctor, short of being struck off.

She will continue to practise pending the outcome of the appeal. The appeal before the Court of Three Judges is due to be heard in the week of Jan 14 next year.

The court papers, seen by The Straits Times yesterday, revealed that Dr Lim was found guilty last month of 94 charges of professional misconduct.

This included making false representations in some invoices she sent to other medical specialists she called in to treat the patient.

The dispute centres on the bill she charged for treating Pengiran Anak Hajah Damit, the sister of the Brunei queen, before the patient died of cancer in 2007.

:eek: The bills for her last seven months came up to about $25 million. But she has argued the figure was actually lower and included the cost of flying the patient between Singapore and Brunei.

The bill size shocked Singapore's Health Ministry, which filed charges of professional misconduct against her with the Singapore Medical Council (SMC) in 2010.

It led to a protracted battle between Dr Lim and the SMC from January 2010 to December last year, with disciplinary hearings as well as court judgments that upheld the medical tribunal's right to hold the hearings.

Among other things, it emerged in March last year that she tried to stop the disciplinary hearing against her by writing to the Foreign Minister, to alert him that it might expose information that could cause "unnecessary embarrassment" to Brunei and affect bilateral ties.

The case now before the Court of Three Judges is expected to shape up to be the final battle royale. It will give the medical profession the opportunity to clarify issues like what constitutes overcharging.

In her appeal, Dr Lim is not only asking for the penalties to be dismissed. She also wants the court to declare that she is not liable for the costs of the hearings before the disciplinary committees and the Court of Three Judges.

Her lawyer, Senior Counsel Lee Eng Beng, told The Straits Times yesterday she will argue that the SMC's disciplinary committee had made "errors in law and errors of fact" in reaching its decision.

One of her main arguments is that Singapore has no guidelines on the maximum fee that a doctor can charge a patient, and that fees charged are agreed on between a doctor and a patient.

She said in the court papers filed that her patients range from the man in the street to politicians and military leaders of various countries, as well as various members of royal families. She added that she has never been the subject of disciplinary proceedings aside from this conviction.

"I did my very best and went beyond the call of duty for the patient," she said referring to her Brunei patient.

Dr Lim, who is overseas, could not be contacted yesterday. The SMC said it was "not in a position to comment on the matter".
 
hi there


1. hahaha!
2. just like some slap on the wrist thing for such high-flyer thing.
3. sup sup sui!
 
Dr Lim, 57, is appealing against the punishment, which was revealed in appeal papers she filed in the High Court last week.

The punishment is believed to be among the most severe meted out to an errant doctor, short of being struck off.

Severe? 3 years suspension + 10k fine seems like a light slap to me. She has consistently misrepresented in her bills and the amount is no peanuts.

The loss of reputation is a bigger issue in my opinion. Yet she is appealing against this light sentence.
 
3 years suspension is like pat on the back and time for a holiday.

$25 million over 7 months. You guys know any doc making this kind of dough?
 
3 years suspension is like pat on the back and time for a holiday.

$25 million over 7 months. You guys know any doc making this kind of dough?


hi there


1. bro, some "cheating" doc will definitely make such monies in no time hoh!
 
Bloody shameless money-faced doctor....

class of 1973 RI/RJC.....
 
Bloody shameless money-faced doctor....

class of 1973 RI/RJC.....

cheapskate royal family. what's $25million to them? brunei royalty must be jealous they can't produce their own $25million doctors.

unless they are running out of oil, in which case, they are right to haggle over every single cent.
 
Last edited:
bloody cheapskates royal family. what's $25million to them? brunei royalty must be jealous they can produce their own $25million doctors.

unless they are running out of oil, in which case, they are right to haggle over every single cent.

I'm sure they wouldn't paying $25 million....if the patient didn't end up dead eventually.
 
cheapskate royal family. what's $25million to them? brunei royalty must be jealous they can't produce their own $25million doctors.

unless they are running out of oil, in which case, they are right to haggle over every single cent.

I'm sure they wouldn't paying $25 million....if the patient didn't end up dead eventually.

die already then refuse to pay? knn indeed is cheapskate........if not happy with the amount charge why earlier never kpkb?
 
this case different........none of the 'victims' complained.........its those kaypo 'outsiders' who kpkb

Ahh thats true.

Last i heard, the 'victims' are still looking for ways and means to hand over their $$ to the someone.

KNN, Im in the wrong line. :D
 
dbbed6970db4f647_1.jpg


"How can u left out my pic?"
 
That's the kind of medical "professionals" the Sinkies system have churned out... completely devoid of humanity.
Unrepentant.
 
SMC suspended renowned surgeon Susan Lim from practicing for 3 yrs

ST_20120823_SUSAN23_3266337e.jpg


The Singapore Medical Council has ruled that renowned surgeon Susan Lim be suspended from practising for three years.

She is also to be fined $10,000 in a case involving overcharging a member of the Brunei royal family. She will also be censured in writing and must undertake not to overcharge again.

Dr Lim, 57, is appealing against the punishment, which was revealed in appeal papers she filed in the High Court last week. The punishment is believed to be among the most severe meted out to an errant doctor, short of being struck off.

She will continue to practise pending the outcome of the appeal. The appeal before the Court of Three Judges is due to be heard in the week of Jan 14 next year.
 
That's the kind of medical "professionals" the Sinkies system have churned out... completely devoid of humanity.
Unrepentant.

as opposed to the doctors churned out by malaysia...completely devoid of medical knowledge.
 
THE Singapore Medical Council has ruled that renowned surgeon Susan Lim be suspended from practising for three years.

She is also to be fined $10,000 in a case involving overcharging a member of the Brunei royal family. She will also be censured in writing and must undertake not to overcharge again.

did she have to write 500 times on the black board _ "I will not overcharge again"?
 
If she did nothing wrong why did her husband and her fly to Brunei and offer to withdraw her bill if they were prepared to withdraw the complaint. A cheapskate will readyly agree the entire $25million bill be wiped out.

She not only cheated the patient but her professional colleagues and fellow doctors. Imagine putting an additional $200k on top of $12k bill from a colleague.

She is appealing not because she thinks that she can win but more to project the image that she did admit guilt and keep claiming innocence. Professionals facing serious charges will seldom plead guilty and pursue all avenues. The consequences would be crushing.
 
Back
Top