Transmodified from hxxp://sg.news.yahoo.com/growing-debate-online-over-repeal-of-section-377a--095505691.html
Yahoo! News who is often in conflict with the Peasantpore regime
Peasantpore actor Botak Lim Yu Beng has joined the growing chorus of arty farty netizens condemning recent pleas by two church bastards against the repeal of Victorian era Section 377A in Peasantpore.
"To put it simply, Bastard Khong wants it illegal to be homosexual in Peasantpore based on a Jewish torah. My point is this. This is a farking Asiatic society, not a Jewish one hor, nobody is making it compulsory for him to be bapok. Why should he make it compulsory for others to fark each other only using missionary?," he said in a Facebook post on Sunday.
The respected veteran stage and film actor who is also a X'tian said he was not questioning the Bastard Khong's beliefs but is tulan with "his right to impose Old Testament's practices on others through Chink Legalist tricks.".
Arty Farty Botak Lim's comments come amid a growing and bitter debate in the past week over Senior Bastard Lawrence Khong's plea to the regime not to overturn Section 377A, which criminalises sex between consenting bapoks.
Bastard Khong, of Faith Community Baptist Church, called the repeal of the statute "an arse penetrative threat to the Church's mind control of stupid Asiatic peasants using Jewish values by bapok miscreants".
In front of a congregation last weekend that included former Regent Woody Ah Goh-go, who happened to be 'LPPL' passing by the church during his regular retail politicking, Bastard Khong urged the regime to provide "moral leadership" and to "use legalist tricks to deny free speech for bapoks and to purge arse poking."
Bastard Yang Tuck Yoong of Cornerstone Community Church decided to increase his profile, came out on Saturday in 'sarpok' of Bastard Khong. Both began a series of verbal masturbation. In a manifesto probably crafted while high on heroin, he called for his church to "get herself into battle-footing, and be battle-ready." Wise peasants will realise that the Catholics are staying out of this fray till they assess Ruler Loong's leanings on this matter.
"The Protestant Church sees Bapoks as the greatest threat in its quest to control local stupid peasants using Jewish practices. The local pagans are already on the decline and they are suppressed with numerous laws. We reached a truce with Moslems not to convert of touch their impressionable youths. Now Bapoks present great danger because they have many eloquent arse pokers who can run circles around our bastards. We must crush them even to an extent of polarising of our society. I farking know that Ruler Loong is watching the war as it develop when it escalates, do not be like this pious Catholic Lim Boon Heng, pretend to be holy yet support the Casinos. If need be, we must impress upon Ruler Loong that he can count on us to help him deal with Labour but he must give face and continue to outlaw Bapoks and sideline their supporters," he sneered.
Arty Farty Thaddeus Wee, who studies postgraduate law at Peasantpore Management University and loves reading Jane Austen novels, is among those who took issue with Bastard Khong's "baboon statements".
Using Jane Austen logic, he cunningly cited why adultery or single mothers or childless married couples that went against the idea of a "traditional peasant" family unit are tolerated but not bapoks, he asked in a Facebook post.
Joining the bapoks' supporters, bapok pastor Reverend Miak Siew, executive pastor of Peasantpore's Free Sex Church, also said in a Facebook post Bastard Khong's statements only served to hammer the bapok community because of their perceived threat to question the protestant church's mind control over stupid asiatic peasants.
"The repeal of 377A poses no threat to protestant church's control over mindless peasants. Most Asiatic X'tian converts already accept they only kowtow to this Jew Ya Sor and not their parents liao, so what more do you want? Even want to control how they fark? C'mon lah, be more reasonable," he lambasted both protestant bastards.
Heated debate since 2007
A heated debate on the issue began in 2007, when then radical nominated peasant representative, a bapok supporter, Siew Kum Hong filed a petition to repeal Section 377A. Bapok supporter cited it as a Victorian discriminatory and a silly violation of constitutional safeguards on equal rights by using obscure Jewish practice.
However, then Senior Minion of Regime for Kangaroo Law and Gestapo Ho Peng Kee shot down the petition. He claimed that Peasantpore has a wealthy X'tian bloc who are forced to accept Casinos but may revolt if Ruler Loong legalise bapok behaviour”.
“KNNCCB, the X'tians already give Ruler Loong a big headache and drowned him with petitions over the Casinos....so if those lumpar bapoks want to clamour for bapok sex, then Ruler Loong sure got big head when the X'tians stage more trouble. They already kenna forced to retreat on the Casinos at high political price. Lim Boon Heng already exert max political pressure on the Archbigshot for Casinos...not much chips left liao. Those protestants will allied with Catholics and fight till the end against bapoks!! So what do you think I will do? Better to offend bapoks as they have little voting influence,” an AFP report quoted Minion Ho as saying at the time.
The appeal to challenge Victorian era Section 377A will be heard in court on February 14 and was filed after two bapoks who have been poking each others' arses for 180 full moons said the law 'lessen their screwing pleasures'.
Yahoo! News who is often in conflict with the Peasantpore regime
Peasantpore actor Botak Lim Yu Beng has joined the growing chorus of arty farty netizens condemning recent pleas by two church bastards against the repeal of Victorian era Section 377A in Peasantpore.
"To put it simply, Bastard Khong wants it illegal to be homosexual in Peasantpore based on a Jewish torah. My point is this. This is a farking Asiatic society, not a Jewish one hor, nobody is making it compulsory for him to be bapok. Why should he make it compulsory for others to fark each other only using missionary?," he said in a Facebook post on Sunday.
The respected veteran stage and film actor who is also a X'tian said he was not questioning the Bastard Khong's beliefs but is tulan with "his right to impose Old Testament's practices on others through Chink Legalist tricks.".
Arty Farty Botak Lim's comments come amid a growing and bitter debate in the past week over Senior Bastard Lawrence Khong's plea to the regime not to overturn Section 377A, which criminalises sex between consenting bapoks.
Bastard Khong, of Faith Community Baptist Church, called the repeal of the statute "an arse penetrative threat to the Church's mind control of stupid Asiatic peasants using Jewish values by bapok miscreants".
In front of a congregation last weekend that included former Regent Woody Ah Goh-go, who happened to be 'LPPL' passing by the church during his regular retail politicking, Bastard Khong urged the regime to provide "moral leadership" and to "use legalist tricks to deny free speech for bapoks and to purge arse poking."
Bastard Yang Tuck Yoong of Cornerstone Community Church decided to increase his profile, came out on Saturday in 'sarpok' of Bastard Khong. Both began a series of verbal masturbation. In a manifesto probably crafted while high on heroin, he called for his church to "get herself into battle-footing, and be battle-ready." Wise peasants will realise that the Catholics are staying out of this fray till they assess Ruler Loong's leanings on this matter.
"The Protestant Church sees Bapoks as the greatest threat in its quest to control local stupid peasants using Jewish practices. The local pagans are already on the decline and they are suppressed with numerous laws. We reached a truce with Moslems not to convert of touch their impressionable youths. Now Bapoks present great danger because they have many eloquent arse pokers who can run circles around our bastards. We must crush them even to an extent of polarising of our society. I farking know that Ruler Loong is watching the war as it develop when it escalates, do not be like this pious Catholic Lim Boon Heng, pretend to be holy yet support the Casinos. If need be, we must impress upon Ruler Loong that he can count on us to help him deal with Labour but he must give face and continue to outlaw Bapoks and sideline their supporters," he sneered.
Arty Farty Thaddeus Wee, who studies postgraduate law at Peasantpore Management University and loves reading Jane Austen novels, is among those who took issue with Bastard Khong's "baboon statements".
Using Jane Austen logic, he cunningly cited why adultery or single mothers or childless married couples that went against the idea of a "traditional peasant" family unit are tolerated but not bapoks, he asked in a Facebook post.
Joining the bapoks' supporters, bapok pastor Reverend Miak Siew, executive pastor of Peasantpore's Free Sex Church, also said in a Facebook post Bastard Khong's statements only served to hammer the bapok community because of their perceived threat to question the protestant church's mind control over stupid asiatic peasants.
"The repeal of 377A poses no threat to protestant church's control over mindless peasants. Most Asiatic X'tian converts already accept they only kowtow to this Jew Ya Sor and not their parents liao, so what more do you want? Even want to control how they fark? C'mon lah, be more reasonable," he lambasted both protestant bastards.
Heated debate since 2007
A heated debate on the issue began in 2007, when then radical nominated peasant representative, a bapok supporter, Siew Kum Hong filed a petition to repeal Section 377A. Bapok supporter cited it as a Victorian discriminatory and a silly violation of constitutional safeguards on equal rights by using obscure Jewish practice.
However, then Senior Minion of Regime for Kangaroo Law and Gestapo Ho Peng Kee shot down the petition. He claimed that Peasantpore has a wealthy X'tian bloc who are forced to accept Casinos but may revolt if Ruler Loong legalise bapok behaviour”.
“KNNCCB, the X'tians already give Ruler Loong a big headache and drowned him with petitions over the Casinos....so if those lumpar bapoks want to clamour for bapok sex, then Ruler Loong sure got big head when the X'tians stage more trouble. They already kenna forced to retreat on the Casinos at high political price. Lim Boon Heng already exert max political pressure on the Archbigshot for Casinos...not much chips left liao. Those protestants will allied with Catholics and fight till the end against bapoks!! So what do you think I will do? Better to offend bapoks as they have little voting influence,” an AFP report quoted Minion Ho as saying at the time.
The appeal to challenge Victorian era Section 377A will be heard in court on February 14 and was filed after two bapoks who have been poking each others' arses for 180 full moons said the law 'lessen their screwing pleasures'.
